Riccardo Sacconi, Paolo Forte, Giulia Corradetti, Eliana Costanzo, Vittorio Capuano, Elodie Bousquet, Federico Beretta, Serena Iannuzzi, Maria Sole Polito, Massimo Nicolo', Mariacristina Parravano, Eric Souied, David Sarraf, SriniVas Sadda, Francesco Bandello, Giuseppe Querques
{"title":"Type 3 MNV in AMD: baseline predictors of 3-year macular atrophy development.","authors":"Riccardo Sacconi, Paolo Forte, Giulia Corradetti, Eliana Costanzo, Vittorio Capuano, Elodie Bousquet, Federico Beretta, Serena Iannuzzi, Maria Sole Polito, Massimo Nicolo', Mariacristina Parravano, Eric Souied, David Sarraf, SriniVas Sadda, Francesco Bandello, Giuseppe Querques","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) predictors of the 3-year macular atrophy (MA) development for type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated by anti-VEGF therapy.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We included patients with treatment-naïve type 3 MNV secondary to nAMD at baseline, treated with anti-VEGF during a 3-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified from six retinal referral institutions: 1) San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy 2) University of Genova, Genova, Italy; 3) Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, USA; 4) Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, USA; 5) University of Paris Est, Creteil, France; 6) IRCCS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy. Several baseline predictors of 3-year MA area were analyzed based on structural OCT and demographics.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Multivariate analysis in order to identify baseline independent predictors of the 3-year MA development for type 3 MNV secondary to nAMD treated by anti-VEGF therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 131 eyes of 131 patients (mean age 80±6-year-old, 81% females). Best-corrected visual acuity was 0.49±0.40 LogMAR at the baseline and significantly decreased to 0.59±0.43 LogMAR at the end of 3-year follow-up (p<0.001). Patients were treated with 11±6 anti-VEGF injections and developed atrophy in 75% of cases (from 18% at the baseline). Eyes that developed 3-year MA were treated with a significantly lower number of injections compared to eyes without MA (9.9±5.5 vs 14.7±7.2 injections, p<0.001). The most relevant independent predictors at baseline of MA area at 3-year follow-up were: area of MA at baseline (p<0.001), AMD phenotype (presence of reticular pseudodrusen) (p=0.017), baseline presence of nascent geographic atrophy (p=0.008), and the baseline presence of subretinal hyper-reflective material (p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Macular atrophy development is a frequent complication of type 3 MNV treated with anti-VEGF injections. Several factors could be considered as baseline predictors of atrophy development during the anti-VEGF treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2024.11.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To identify baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) predictors of the 3-year macular atrophy (MA) development for type 3 macular neovascularization (MNV) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated by anti-VEGF therapy.
Participants: We included patients with treatment-naïve type 3 MNV secondary to nAMD at baseline, treated with anti-VEGF during a 3-year follow-up.
Methods: Patients were identified from six retinal referral institutions: 1) San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy 2) University of Genova, Genova, Italy; 3) Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, USA; 4) Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, USA; 5) University of Paris Est, Creteil, France; 6) IRCCS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy. Several baseline predictors of 3-year MA area were analyzed based on structural OCT and demographics.
Main outcome measures: Multivariate analysis in order to identify baseline independent predictors of the 3-year MA development for type 3 MNV secondary to nAMD treated by anti-VEGF therapy.
Results: We included 131 eyes of 131 patients (mean age 80±6-year-old, 81% females). Best-corrected visual acuity was 0.49±0.40 LogMAR at the baseline and significantly decreased to 0.59±0.43 LogMAR at the end of 3-year follow-up (p<0.001). Patients were treated with 11±6 anti-VEGF injections and developed atrophy in 75% of cases (from 18% at the baseline). Eyes that developed 3-year MA were treated with a significantly lower number of injections compared to eyes without MA (9.9±5.5 vs 14.7±7.2 injections, p<0.001). The most relevant independent predictors at baseline of MA area at 3-year follow-up were: area of MA at baseline (p<0.001), AMD phenotype (presence of reticular pseudodrusen) (p=0.017), baseline presence of nascent geographic atrophy (p=0.008), and the baseline presence of subretinal hyper-reflective material (p=0.002).
Conclusions: Macular atrophy development is a frequent complication of type 3 MNV treated with anti-VEGF injections. Several factors could be considered as baseline predictors of atrophy development during the anti-VEGF treatment.