Influence of exposure duration on human pressure-induced inflammatory responses: Comparison between tunnel workers and underwater divers.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Physiological Reports Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.14814/phy2.70130
Zuha Imtiyaz, Owen J O'Neill, Douglas Sward, Phi-Nga Jeannie Le, Awadhesh K Arya, Veena M Bhopale, Abid R Bhat, Stephen R Thom
{"title":"Influence of exposure duration on human pressure-induced inflammatory responses: Comparison between tunnel workers and underwater divers.","authors":"Zuha Imtiyaz, Owen J O'Neill, Douglas Sward, Phi-Nga Jeannie Le, Awadhesh K Arya, Veena M Bhopale, Abid R Bhat, Stephen R Thom","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Information is scarce on human responses to high pressure exposures out of water, such as related to tunnel construction workers. We hypothesized that differences in the longer durations of exposures for tunnel workers versus underwater divers results in greater inflammatory responses linked to the pathophysiology of decompression sickness (DCS). Blood was analyzed from 15 tunnel workers (36.1 ± 10.5 (SD) years old, 6 women) exposed to 142-156 kPa pressure for 4.1-4.9 h compared to 8 SCUBA divers (39.3 ± 13.3 (SD) years old, 6 women) exposed to 149 kPa for 0.61 hours. Despite differences in pressure duration between groups, elevations were the same for blood microparticles (MPs) (128 ± 28% MPs/μl) and intra-MPs interleukin (IL-1β) (376 ± 212% pg/million MPs), and for decreases of plasma gelsolin (pGSN, 31 ± 27% μg/mL). The number of circulating CD66b + neutrophils and evidence of cell activation, insignificant for divers, increased in tunnel workers. Across 3 exposures, the mean neutrophil count increased 150 ± 11%. Neutrophil activation increased by 1 to 2% of cells expressing cell surface CD18, myeloperoxidase, platelet-specific CD41, and decrease of cell bound pGSN. We conclude that MPs elevations occur rapidly in humans and reach steady state in minutes with pressure exposures and neutrophil activation requires significantly longer exposure times.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"12 22","pages":"e70130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information is scarce on human responses to high pressure exposures out of water, such as related to tunnel construction workers. We hypothesized that differences in the longer durations of exposures for tunnel workers versus underwater divers results in greater inflammatory responses linked to the pathophysiology of decompression sickness (DCS). Blood was analyzed from 15 tunnel workers (36.1 ± 10.5 (SD) years old, 6 women) exposed to 142-156 kPa pressure for 4.1-4.9 h compared to 8 SCUBA divers (39.3 ± 13.3 (SD) years old, 6 women) exposed to 149 kPa for 0.61 hours. Despite differences in pressure duration between groups, elevations were the same for blood microparticles (MPs) (128 ± 28% MPs/μl) and intra-MPs interleukin (IL-1β) (376 ± 212% pg/million MPs), and for decreases of plasma gelsolin (pGSN, 31 ± 27% μg/mL). The number of circulating CD66b + neutrophils and evidence of cell activation, insignificant for divers, increased in tunnel workers. Across 3 exposures, the mean neutrophil count increased 150 ± 11%. Neutrophil activation increased by 1 to 2% of cells expressing cell surface CD18, myeloperoxidase, platelet-specific CD41, and decrease of cell bound pGSN. We conclude that MPs elevations occur rapidly in humans and reach steady state in minutes with pressure exposures and neutrophil activation requires significantly longer exposure times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
暴露时间对人体压力引起的炎症反应的影响:隧道工人与水下潜水员的比较。
有关人类在水外高压暴露下的反应的信息很少,例如与隧道施工人员有关的信息。我们假设,隧道工人与水下潜水员暴露时间较长的差异会导致与减压病(DCS)病理生理有关的炎症反应加剧。对 15 名隧道工人(36.1 ± 10.5 (SD) 岁,6 名女性)暴露在 142-156 kPa 压力下 4.1-4.9 小时的血液进行了分析,相比之下,8 名 SCUBA 潜水员(39.3 ± 13.3 (SD) 岁,6 名女性)暴露在 149 kPa 压力下 0.61 小时。尽管各组的压力持续时间不同,但血液微颗粒(MPs)(128 ± 28% MPs/μl)和微颗粒内白细胞介素(IL-1β)(376 ± 212% pg/million MPs)的升高以及血浆凝胶蛋白(pGSN,31 ± 27% μg/mL)的降低是相同的。循环 CD66b + 中性粒细胞的数量和细胞活化的证据在潜水员中并不明显,但在隧道工人中却有所增加。在 3 次暴露中,中性粒细胞的平均数量增加了 150 ± 11%。表达细胞表面 CD18、髓过氧化物酶、血小板特异性 CD41 的中性粒细胞活化增加了 1 到 2%,细胞结合 pGSN 减少。我们的结论是,人体内的 MPs 升高很快,暴露于压力下几分钟就能达到稳定状态,而中性粒细胞活化则需要更长的暴露时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of occupational exposure: A study on cardiovascular autonomic functions of male gas station attendants in Sri Lanka. Physiologists as medical scientists: An early warning from the German academic system. Examining the effect of salbutamol use in ozone air pollution by people with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Reverse epidemiology of obesity paradox: Fact or fiction? Spinal pain prevalence and associated determinants: A population-based study using the National Survey for Wales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1