Health-related quality of life and symptom concordance between patients and physicians in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States, Europe, and Japan

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107869
R. James White , Dario Vizza , Rogier Klok , Julia Harley , Mark Small , Dominik Lautsch
{"title":"Health-related quality of life and symptom concordance between patients and physicians in pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States, Europe, and Japan","authors":"R. James White ,&nbsp;Dario Vizza ,&nbsp;Rogier Klok ,&nbsp;Julia Harley ,&nbsp;Mark Small ,&nbsp;Dominik Lautsch","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study involved analyses of a real world, cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Physician and patient symptom concordance was assessed, and patients self-reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Data were drawn from the Adelphi PAH Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™ in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, and Japan, between March and August 2022. EQ-5D 5L utility, EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and emPHasis-10 (e10) HRQoL scores were reported by patients. Physician-patient symptom concordance was analyzed with Cohen's Weighted Kappa (κ) analysis. Of 628 PAH patients, the mean (SD) EQ-5D VAS and e10 scores were 66 (17) and 23 (11). Data was stratified by World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO-FC). As WHO-FC increased, EQ-5D utility and VAS scores decreased and e10 scores increased, indicating poorer patient-reported HRQoL. Symptom concordance varied, ranging from κ = 0.11–0.57 (slight-moderate agreement), and physicians frequently underestimated the presence and severity of patient-reported symptoms. Future research should aim to bridge this gap between patient and physician understanding of HRQoL and the symptom burden associated with PAH.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 107869"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611124003445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study involved analyses of a real world, cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Physician and patient symptom concordance was assessed, and patients self-reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). Data were drawn from the Adelphi PAH Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™ in the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, and Japan, between March and August 2022. EQ-5D 5L utility, EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and emPHasis-10 (e10) HRQoL scores were reported by patients. Physician-patient symptom concordance was analyzed with Cohen's Weighted Kappa (κ) analysis. Of 628 PAH patients, the mean (SD) EQ-5D VAS and e10 scores were 66 (17) and 23 (11). Data was stratified by World Health Organization Functional Class (WHO-FC). As WHO-FC increased, EQ-5D utility and VAS scores decreased and e10 scores increased, indicating poorer patient-reported HRQoL. Symptom concordance varied, ranging from κ = 0.11–0.57 (slight-moderate agreement), and physicians frequently underestimated the presence and severity of patient-reported symptoms. Future research should aim to bridge this gap between patient and physician understanding of HRQoL and the symptom burden associated with PAH.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国、欧洲和日本肺动脉高压患者与医生之间的健康相关生活质量和症状一致性。
本研究分析了一项针对医生及其肺动脉高压 (PAH) 患者的真实横断面调查。对医生和患者的症状一致性进行了评估,并由患者自我报告与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)。数据来自 2022 年 3 月至 8 月期间在美国、法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、英国和日本开展的 Adelphi PAH 疾病专项计划 (DSP)™。患者报告了 EQ-5D 5L 实用性、EQ-5D 视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评分和 emPHasis-10 (e10) HRQoL 评分,并通过 Cohen's Weighted Kappa (κ)分析评估了医患症状一致性。在 628 名 PAH 患者中,EQ-5D VAS 和 e10 评分的平均值(标清)分别为 66(17)和 23(11)。数据按世界卫生组织功能分级(WHO-FC)进行分层。随着 WHO-FC 的增加,EQ-5D 实用性和 VAS 分数下降,e10 分数上升,表明患者报告的 HRQoL 较差。症状一致性不尽相同,从 κ = 0.11 到 0.57(轻度-中度一致性)不等,医生经常低估患者报告症状的存在和严重程度。未来的研究应致力于缩小患者和医生对 HRQoL 以及 PAH 相关症状负担的理解差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory medicine
Respiratory medicine 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
199
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants. Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.
期刊最新文献
Home noninvasive ventilation in pediatric patients: Does one size fit all? Diagnostic and prognostic implications of a deep suprasternal notch in idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis Local and systemic adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroids - Does ciclesonide differ from other inhaled corticosteroids? Investigating the risk factors for the coexistence of insomnia and its exacerbation in AECOPD Exploring the Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation and its Determinants in Lung Transplant Candidates with Cystic Fibrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1