Exploring Facets of Trust and Religiosity in Organ Donation for Black and White Americans.

IF 2.2 1区 哲学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Religion & Health Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1007/s10943-024-02173-7
Amber Marie Reinhart
{"title":"Exploring Facets of Trust and Religiosity in Organ Donation for Black and White Americans.","authors":"Amber Marie Reinhart","doi":"10.1007/s10943-024-02173-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines how Black and White Americans perceive two facets of trust (trust in medical doctor and trust in medical care for racial group) and two facets of religiosity (religious service attendance and religious norms regarding organ donation) in relation to the topic of organ donation. Two hundred and one participants (N = 201) were surveyed across the United States using the Qualtrics survey company. Bivariate analyses found donor status was not related to religious service attendance (r = - .001, p > .05) or religious norms (r = .09, p > .05). Donor status was significantly related to trust in doctors, (r = - .25, p < .001) and trust in medical care for racial group, r = - .239, p < .001). Independent samples t-tests revealed Black Americans had significantly lower levels of trust in medical care for racial group than White Americans (t = - 5.14, p < .001) but did not differ in levels of trust in doctor (t = - 1.73, p > .05). The implications of these findings for future research and campaigns are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-024-02173-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how Black and White Americans perceive two facets of trust (trust in medical doctor and trust in medical care for racial group) and two facets of religiosity (religious service attendance and religious norms regarding organ donation) in relation to the topic of organ donation. Two hundred and one participants (N = 201) were surveyed across the United States using the Qualtrics survey company. Bivariate analyses found donor status was not related to religious service attendance (r = - .001, p > .05) or religious norms (r = .09, p > .05). Donor status was significantly related to trust in doctors, (r = - .25, p < .001) and trust in medical care for racial group, r = - .239, p < .001). Independent samples t-tests revealed Black Americans had significantly lower levels of trust in medical care for racial group than White Americans (t = - 5.14, p < .001) but did not differ in levels of trust in doctor (t = - 1.73, p > .05). The implications of these findings for future research and campaigns are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索美国黑人和白人在器官捐赠中的信任和宗教信仰。
本研究探讨了美国黑人和白人如何看待与器官捐献主题相关的两个方面的信任(对医生的信任和对种族群体医疗护理的信任)和两个方面的宗教信仰(参加宗教仪式和有关器官捐献的宗教规范)。我们使用 Qualtrics 调查公司在全美范围内对 210 名参与者(N = 201)进行了调查。双变量分析发现,捐赠者身份与宗教仪式出席率(r = - .001,p > .05)或宗教规范(r = .09,p > .05)无关。捐赠者身份与对医生的信任有明显关系(r = - .25,p .05)。本文讨论了这些发现对未来研究和活动的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: Journal of Religion and Health is an international publication concerned with the creative partnership of psychology and religion/sprituality and the relationship between religion/spirituality and both mental and physical health. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal publishes peer-reviewed original contributions from scholars and professionals of all religious faiths. Articles may be clinical, statistical, theoretical, impressionistic, or anecdotal. Founded in 1961 by the Blanton-Peale Institute, which joins the perspectives of psychology and religion, Journal of Religion and Health explores the most contemporary modes of religious thought with particular emphasis on their relevance to current medical and psychological research.
期刊最新文献
Human Dignity and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Basis for a Catholic Ethics on AI. Religion, Religiosity, and Smoking Among Older Adults: Results from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil), 2019-2021. Spirituality and Factors Relevant to Spiritual Nursing-Care Needs Among Chinese Patients with Cancer. Spirituality in Managing Perceived Stress and Promoting Self-Care: A Descriptive Study on Nursing Students in Spain. A systematic Review of Spirituality Tools Based on Psychometric Qualities and Recommendations for Future Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1