Bayesian Selection of Relaxed-clock Models: Distinguishing Between Independent and Autocorrelated Rates.

IF 6.1 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Systematic Biology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syae066
Muthukumaran Panchaksaram, Lucas Freitas, Mario Dos Reis
{"title":"Bayesian Selection of Relaxed-clock Models: Distinguishing Between Independent and Autocorrelated Rates.","authors":"Muthukumaran Panchaksaram, Lucas Freitas, Mario Dos Reis","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syae066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Bayesian molecular-clock dating of species divergences, rate models are used to construct the prior on the molecular evolutionary rates for branches in the phylogeny, with independent and autocorrelated rate models being commonly used. The two classes of models, however, can result in markedly different divergence time estimates for the same dataset, and thus selecting the best rate model appears important for obtaining reliable in- ferences of divergence times. However, the properties of Bayesian rate model selection are not well understood, in particular when the number of sequence partitions analysed increases and when age calibrations (such as fossil calibrations) are misspecified. Further- more, Bayesian rate model selection is computationally expensive as it requires calculation of marginal likelihoods by MCMC sampling, and therefore methods that can speed up the model selection procedure without compromising its accuracy are desirable. In this study, we use a combination of computer simulations and real data analysis to investigate the sta- tistical behaviour of Bayesian rate model selection and we also explore approximations of the likelihood to improve computational efficiency in large phylogenomic datasets. Our simulations demonstrate that the posterior probability for the correct rate model converges to one as more molecular sequence partitions are analysed and when no calibrations are used, as expected due to asymptotic Bayesian model selection theory. Furthermore, we also show the model selection procedure is robust to slight misspecification of calibrations, and reliable inference of the correct rate model is possible in this case. However, we show that when calibrations are seriously misspecified, calculated model probabilities are com- pletely wrong and may converge to one for the wrong rate model. Finally, we demonstrate that approximating the phylogenetic likelihood under an arcsine branch-length transform can dramatically reduce the computational cost of rate model selection without compro- mising accuracy. We test the approximate procedure on two large phylogenies of primates (372 species) and flowering plants (644 species), replicating results obtained on smaller datasets using exact likelihood. Our findings and methodology can assist users in selecting the optimal rate model for estimating times and rates along the Tree of Life.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae066","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Bayesian molecular-clock dating of species divergences, rate models are used to construct the prior on the molecular evolutionary rates for branches in the phylogeny, with independent and autocorrelated rate models being commonly used. The two classes of models, however, can result in markedly different divergence time estimates for the same dataset, and thus selecting the best rate model appears important for obtaining reliable in- ferences of divergence times. However, the properties of Bayesian rate model selection are not well understood, in particular when the number of sequence partitions analysed increases and when age calibrations (such as fossil calibrations) are misspecified. Further- more, Bayesian rate model selection is computationally expensive as it requires calculation of marginal likelihoods by MCMC sampling, and therefore methods that can speed up the model selection procedure without compromising its accuracy are desirable. In this study, we use a combination of computer simulations and real data analysis to investigate the sta- tistical behaviour of Bayesian rate model selection and we also explore approximations of the likelihood to improve computational efficiency in large phylogenomic datasets. Our simulations demonstrate that the posterior probability for the correct rate model converges to one as more molecular sequence partitions are analysed and when no calibrations are used, as expected due to asymptotic Bayesian model selection theory. Furthermore, we also show the model selection procedure is robust to slight misspecification of calibrations, and reliable inference of the correct rate model is possible in this case. However, we show that when calibrations are seriously misspecified, calculated model probabilities are com- pletely wrong and may converge to one for the wrong rate model. Finally, we demonstrate that approximating the phylogenetic likelihood under an arcsine branch-length transform can dramatically reduce the computational cost of rate model selection without compro- mising accuracy. We test the approximate procedure on two large phylogenies of primates (372 species) and flowering plants (644 species), replicating results obtained on smaller datasets using exact likelihood. Our findings and methodology can assist users in selecting the optimal rate model for estimating times and rates along the Tree of Life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
松弛时钟模型的贝叶斯选择:区分独立速率和自相关速率。
在物种分化的贝叶斯分子钟测年法中,速率模型用于构建系统发育分支的分子进化速率先验,常用的有独立速率模型和自相关速率模型。然而,这两类模型对同一数据集可得出明显不同的分歧时间估计值,因此,选择最佳速率模型对于获得可靠的分歧时间差异似乎非常重要。然而,人们对贝叶斯速率模型选择的特性并不十分了解,特别是当分析的序列分区数量增加和年龄校准(如化石校准)被错误指定时。此外,贝叶斯速率模型选择需要通过 MCMC 采样计算边际似然,因此计算成本很高,因此我们希望采用既能加快模型选择过程又不影响其准确性的方法。在本研究中,我们采用计算机模拟和实际数据分析相结合的方法来研究贝叶斯速率模型选择的统计行为,同时我们还探索了似然的近似值,以提高大型系统发生组数据集的计算效率。我们的模拟结果表明,当分析的分子序列分区越多,在不使用校准的情况下,正确速率模型的后验概率会趋近于 1,这是贝叶斯模型选择理论的渐进性所预期的。此外,我们还证明了模型选择程序对校准的轻微错误规范具有鲁棒性,在这种情况下可以可靠地推断出正确的速率模型。然而,我们证明,当定标严重失当时,计算出的模型概率是完全错误的,可能会收敛为错误速率模型的概率。最后,我们证明了在 arcsine 分支长度变换下对系统发育似然进行近似,可以显著降低速率模型选择的计算成本,而不会影响准确性。我们在灵长类动物(372 个物种)和开花植物(644 个物种)的两个大型系统发生上测试了近似程序,复制了使用精确似然法在较小数据集上获得的结果。我们的发现和方法可以帮助用户选择最佳的速率模型,以估算生命树的时间和速率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
期刊最新文献
A phylogenetic approach to delimitate species in a probabilistic way Dating the bacterial tree of life based on ancient symbiosis. Inference of multiple mergers while dating a pathogen phylogeny Integrating Deep Learning Derived Morphological Traits and Molecular Data for Total-Evidence Phylogenetics: Lessons from Digitized Collections. Punctuated versus gradual shifts in the multivariate evolutionary process: a test with paired radiations of scincid lizards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1