Nurse educators' satisfaction with online Objective Structured Clinical Examination scoring system.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.6816.4344
Fahni Haris, Ferika Indarwati, Yanuar Primanda, Resti Yulianti Sutrisno, Kellyana Irawati, Yin-Hwa Shih
{"title":"Nurse educators' satisfaction with online Objective Structured Clinical Examination scoring system.","authors":"Fahni Haris, Ferika Indarwati, Yanuar Primanda, Resti Yulianti Sutrisno, Kellyana Irawati, Yin-Hwa Shih","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.6816.4344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>the paper-based OSCE (Pa-OSCE) scoring system has several drawbacks, including significant paper waste and being time-consuming. This study aims to assess examiner satisfaction with the On-OSCE scoring management system, identify and weigh the potential benefits of the innovation, and promote its use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>using a cross-sectional study design, we developed satisfaction inventory consisting of four domains: time-saving, user-friendliness, prospective application, and objectivity. This inventory was used to compare satisfaction scores between two examiner groups (a total of 67 subjects).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the 20-item satisfaction inventory demonstrated high validity and reliability (0.98 and 0.97, respectively). The average scoring time was significantly shorter in the online scoring management system group (p<0.001). Both the total satisfaction score and the scores for each domain were significantly higher in the online scoring management system group compared to the paper-based scoring management system group (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>a high proportion of the examiners provided positive feedback on the online scoring management system. The online scoring management system saves the time to score, and is more objective, easier to use, and is recommended for implementation. Online scoring management systems can be implemented in nursing education institutions globally to improve scoring efficiency. Additionally, the 20-item satisfaction inventory can serve as a benchmarking tool to assess educators worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":48692,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","volume":"32 ","pages":"e4344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6816.4344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: the paper-based OSCE (Pa-OSCE) scoring system has several drawbacks, including significant paper waste and being time-consuming. This study aims to assess examiner satisfaction with the On-OSCE scoring management system, identify and weigh the potential benefits of the innovation, and promote its use.

Methods: using a cross-sectional study design, we developed satisfaction inventory consisting of four domains: time-saving, user-friendliness, prospective application, and objectivity. This inventory was used to compare satisfaction scores between two examiner groups (a total of 67 subjects).

Results: the 20-item satisfaction inventory demonstrated high validity and reliability (0.98 and 0.97, respectively). The average scoring time was significantly shorter in the online scoring management system group (p<0.001). Both the total satisfaction score and the scores for each domain were significantly higher in the online scoring management system group compared to the paper-based scoring management system group (p<0.001).

Conclusions: a high proportion of the examiners provided positive feedback on the online scoring management system. The online scoring management system saves the time to score, and is more objective, easier to use, and is recommended for implementation. Online scoring management systems can be implemented in nursing education institutions globally to improve scoring efficiency. Additionally, the 20-item satisfaction inventory can serve as a benchmarking tool to assess educators worldwide.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士教育工作者对在线客观结构化临床考试评分系统的满意度。
目的:基于纸张的OSCE(Pa-OSCE)评分系统有几个缺点,包括大量浪费纸张和耗费时间。本研究旨在评估考官对On-OSCE评分管理系统的满意度,识别和权衡创新的潜在益处,并推广其使用。方法:采用横断面研究设计,我们编制了满意度调查表,包括四个方面:节省时间、用户友好性、前瞻性应用和客观性。结果:20 个项目的满意度量表显示出较高的有效性和可靠性(分别为 0.98 和 0.97)。在线评分管理系统组的平均评分时间明显更短(p结论:大部分考官对在线评分管理系统给予了积极反馈。在线评分管理系统节省了评分时间,而且更客观、更易于使用,建议实施。在线评分管理系统可在全球护理教育机构实施,以提高评分效率。此外,20 项满意度调查表可作为评估全球教育工作者的基准工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem constitui-se no órgão oficial de divulgação científica da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo e do Centro Colaborador da OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem. Foi criada em abril de 1992 sendo sua primeira edição publicada em janeiro de 1993. No período de 1993 a 1997 tinha periodicidade semestral, de 1997 a 2000 trimestral e, a partir de janeiro de 2001, tem periodicidade bimestral. Caracteriza-se como periódico de circulação internacional, abrangendo predominantemente os países da América Latina e Caribe, embora seja também divulgado para assinantes dos Estados Unidos, Portugal e Espanha.
期刊最新文献
Community of Practice for Nursing: connecting nurses in the Region of the Americas. Nurse educators' satisfaction with online Objective Structured Clinical Examination scoring system. Digital health: contributions from Nursing. International Nursing doctoral education: quality matters. Investing in the future of Nursing: the urgent need for sustainable and innovative work environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1