Hospital readmissions reduction program penalizes safety net hospital clinicians.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000161
Sarah Kirsch, Yousra Elsir, Katie Shelford, Janessa Vail, Anne Wildermuth
{"title":"Hospital readmissions reduction program penalizes safety net hospital clinicians.","authors":"Sarah Kirsch, Yousra Elsir, Katie Shelford, Janessa Vail, Anne Wildermuth","doi":"10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), started under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was created with the intention to improve healthcare quality and costs. However, research on disparities in healthcare demonstrates the HRRP's protocolized risk-adjustment calculations neglect social factors, which consequently harms disadvantaged patient populations and unfairly contributes to clinician and hospital penalties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA literature review was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library to explore the inclusion of social factors such as socioeconomic status on risk-adjustment calculations, and their relation to healthcare disparities, penalties, and outcomes. Fifteen articles published in the past 10 years were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven (73%) of the 15 articles in this systematic review indicated that the HRRP potentiated healthcare disparities based on risk-adjustment calculation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review strongly suggests modifying the HRRP risk-adjustment calculations to include social risk factors has the potential to equalize reimbursement for hospitals that serve the most vulnerable patients and reduce negative unintended consequences of the HRRP. Future studies are needed to produce more conclusive, consistent evidence on the effect of social risk factors in risk-adjustment calculations and associated outcomes and to determine how HRRP's risk-adjustment calculations can be modified to reduce disparities in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":48728,"journal":{"name":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","volume":"37 12","pages":"44-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaapa-Journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAA.0000000000000161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), started under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was created with the intention to improve healthcare quality and costs. However, research on disparities in healthcare demonstrates the HRRP's protocolized risk-adjustment calculations neglect social factors, which consequently harms disadvantaged patient populations and unfairly contributes to clinician and hospital penalties.

Methods: A PRISMA literature review was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library to explore the inclusion of social factors such as socioeconomic status on risk-adjustment calculations, and their relation to healthcare disparities, penalties, and outcomes. Fifteen articles published in the past 10 years were reviewed.

Results: Eleven (73%) of the 15 articles in this systematic review indicated that the HRRP potentiated healthcare disparities based on risk-adjustment calculation.

Conclusions: This review strongly suggests modifying the HRRP risk-adjustment calculations to include social risk factors has the potential to equalize reimbursement for hospitals that serve the most vulnerable patients and reduce negative unintended consequences of the HRRP. Future studies are needed to produce more conclusive, consistent evidence on the effect of social risk factors in risk-adjustment calculations and associated outcomes and to determine how HRRP's risk-adjustment calculations can be modified to reduce disparities in healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降低再入院率计划惩罚了安全网医院的临床医生。
目的:根据《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)启动、由医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)管理的 "降低再住院率计划"(Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program,HRRP)旨在改善医疗质量和成本。然而,有关医疗差距的研究表明,HRRP 的规程化风险调整计算忽略了社会因素,从而损害了弱势患者群体的利益,并不公平地造成了对临床医生和医院的处罚:方法: 我们使用 PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了 PRISMA 文献综述,以探讨将社会经济地位等社会因素纳入风险调整计算的情况,以及这些因素与医疗差异、处罚和结果之间的关系。对过去 10 年中发表的 15 篇文章进行了审查:在这 15 篇系统性综述文章中,有 11 篇(73%)文章指出,基于风险调整计算,HRRP 加剧了医疗差距:本综述有力地表明,修改 HRRP 风险调整计算方法以纳入社会风险因素,有可能使为最弱势患者提供服务的医院获得平等的补偿,并减少 HRRP 意外带来的负面影响。未来的研究需要就风险调整计算中社会风险因素的影响及相关结果提供更多确凿、一致的证据,并确定如何修改 HRRP 的风险调整计算以减少医疗保健中的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
310
期刊介绍: ​​​JAAPA is the peer-reviewed clinical journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants (AAPA). Published for more than 25 years, its mission is to support the ongoing education and advancement of physician assistants (PAs) by publishing current information and research on clinical, health policy, and professional issues. Published monthly, JAAPA''s award-winning editorial includes: -Clinical review articles (with AAPA-approved Category I CME in each issue)- Case reports- Clinical departments- Original health services research- Articles on issues of professional interest to PAs
期刊最新文献
A qualitative analysis of PA leaders in Kentucky. A review of Prader-Willi syndrome. Chimeric antigen receptor therapy in hematologic malignancies. CME POST-TEST. Mistaken for migraine: Coccidioidal meningitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1