Clinical leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Organization and Management Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1108/JHOM-05-2024-0205
Homa Chuku, Sharon J Williams, Stephanie Best
{"title":"Clinical leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review.","authors":"Homa Chuku, Sharon J Williams, Stephanie Best","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-05-2024-0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Leadership was a critical component in managing the Covid-19 pandemic. A scoping review of clinical leadership investigates the leadership styles employed by clinicians during times of unprecedented crisis, with the Covid-19 pandemic as a focus.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>The scoping review was designed based on a five-stage approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005). Three key databases were searched: Scopus, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and ProQuest Healthcare Administration between 2020 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 23 papers included in the review, the majority were based on developed countries. Seven leadership approaches were found to be useful in times of crises, with compassionate leadership being particularly effective. Seven key themes relating to the pandemic were also identified.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>This review is limited by the search strategy employed and the possibility some publications could have been missed. However, it is clear from the results that there is limited research on healthcare leadership outside of the acute setting and in developing countries. These are important areas of further research that need to be pursued to inform our learning for other times of unprecedented crisis.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Various leadership styles were employed during the pandemic, but compassionate leadership, which fosters a collaborative, caring and kind environment, becomes a necessity when faced with uncertainty and adversity. This review identifies key factors that leaders need to manage during the pandemic. Practically, it sheds light on leadership strategies that may be employed in future unprecedented crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-05-2024-0205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Leadership was a critical component in managing the Covid-19 pandemic. A scoping review of clinical leadership investigates the leadership styles employed by clinicians during times of unprecedented crisis, with the Covid-19 pandemic as a focus.

Design/methodology/approach: The scoping review was designed based on a five-stage approach proposed by Arksey and O'Malley (2005). Three key databases were searched: Scopus, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and ProQuest Healthcare Administration between 2020 and 2022.

Findings: Of the 23 papers included in the review, the majority were based on developed countries. Seven leadership approaches were found to be useful in times of crises, with compassionate leadership being particularly effective. Seven key themes relating to the pandemic were also identified.

Research limitations/implications: This review is limited by the search strategy employed and the possibility some publications could have been missed. However, it is clear from the results that there is limited research on healthcare leadership outside of the acute setting and in developing countries. These are important areas of further research that need to be pursued to inform our learning for other times of unprecedented crisis.

Originality/value: Various leadership styles were employed during the pandemic, but compassionate leadership, which fosters a collaborative, caring and kind environment, becomes a necessity when faced with uncertainty and adversity. This review identifies key factors that leaders need to manage during the pandemic. Practically, it sheds light on leadership strategies that may be employed in future unprecedented crises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19 大流行期间的临床领导力:范围界定审查。
目的:领导力是管理 Covid-19 大流行病的关键要素。以 Covid-19 大流行病为重点,对临床领导力进行了范围界定,调查了临床医生在前所未有的危机时期所采用的领导风格:范围界定研究是根据 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)提出的五阶段方法设计的。检索了三个主要数据库:Scopus、Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) 和 ProQuest Healthcare Administration:在纳入综述的 23 篇论文中,大多数都是基于发达国家。研究发现,有七种领导方法在危机时期非常有用,其中富有同情心的领导方法尤为有效。研究局限性/影响:本综述受到所采用的搜索策略的限制,可能会遗漏一些出版物。然而,从研究结果中可以清楚地看出,对急症环境之外和发展中国家的医疗保健领导力的研究十分有限。这些都是需要进一步研究的重要领域,以便为我们在其他前所未有的危机时期的学习提供参考:大流行病期间采用了多种领导风格,但在面临不确定性和逆境时,培养协作、关爱和仁慈环境的富有同情心的领导风格成为了一种必要条件。这篇综述指出了大流行病期间领导者需要管理的关键因素。在实践中,它揭示了在未来前所未有的危机中可能采用的领导策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
期刊最新文献
Dry promotions and positive psychology: striking a balance for employee well-being. Artificial intelligence and big data from digital health applications: publication trends and analysis. Clinical leadership during the Covid-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Work engagement of hospital workers in times of pressure: do nonclinical hospital workers react differently from their well-studied clinical colleagues? Workplace health promotion interventions in EU-27 public administrations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1