Open Disclosure Among General Practitioners as Second Victim of a Patient Safety Incident: A Cross-Sectional Study in Flanders (Belgium).

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001299
Laurens Neyens, Esther Stouten, Kris Vanhaecht, José Mira, Massimiliano Panella, Deborah Seys, Birgitte Schoenmakers
{"title":"Open Disclosure Among General Practitioners as Second Victim of a Patient Safety Incident: A Cross-Sectional Study in Flanders (Belgium).","authors":"Laurens Neyens, Esther Stouten, Kris Vanhaecht, José Mira, Massimiliano Panella, Deborah Seys, Birgitte Schoenmakers","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of a patient safety incident (PSI) on nurses and doctors in hospital settings has been studied in depth. However, the impact of a PSI on general practitioners and how those health care professionals can be supported are less clear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate the prevalence of GPs (in training) being personally involved in a PSI, as well as the impact, the support needed, and open disclosure in the aftermath of these PSIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study, conducted between January 3, 2022, and March 5, 2022, led to a sample of 78 GPs or GPs in training in Flanders (Belgium). Participants filled in more than 80% of a questionnaire that measured the involvement in a PSI during the prior year and their entire career, and the impact in terms of emotional symptoms, attitudes, the support needed, and open disclosure were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 78 responses of GPs (in training) filled in the questionnaire, of which 87.2% were involved in a PSI over the course of their entire career and 55.1% during the prior year. Often, such a PSI resulted in permanent patient harm or patient death. The PSI that stuck with the GPs the most had many negative consequences for the GP in question, such as hypervigilance (88.2%) and feelings of guilt (82.4%), stress (79.4%), and shame (75.0%). More than half of the respondents involved want substantive clarity (64.4%), and in case of 51.7% of the respondents, an open discussion with the patient and/or family took place afterwards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that GPs, even in training, can be negatively impacted after a PSI. Only half of the respondents were involved in an open disclosure process, but the ones involved had a positive feeling after disclosure. More support is needed for health care professionals in the aftermath of a PSI in primary care, and this support could enhance their involvement in the open disclosure process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001299","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of a patient safety incident (PSI) on nurses and doctors in hospital settings has been studied in depth. However, the impact of a PSI on general practitioners and how those health care professionals can be supported are less clear.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to investigate the prevalence of GPs (in training) being personally involved in a PSI, as well as the impact, the support needed, and open disclosure in the aftermath of these PSIs.

Methods: A cross-sectional study, conducted between January 3, 2022, and March 5, 2022, led to a sample of 78 GPs or GPs in training in Flanders (Belgium). Participants filled in more than 80% of a questionnaire that measured the involvement in a PSI during the prior year and their entire career, and the impact in terms of emotional symptoms, attitudes, the support needed, and open disclosure were included.

Results: In total, 78 responses of GPs (in training) filled in the questionnaire, of which 87.2% were involved in a PSI over the course of their entire career and 55.1% during the prior year. Often, such a PSI resulted in permanent patient harm or patient death. The PSI that stuck with the GPs the most had many negative consequences for the GP in question, such as hypervigilance (88.2%) and feelings of guilt (82.4%), stress (79.4%), and shame (75.0%). More than half of the respondents involved want substantive clarity (64.4%), and in case of 51.7% of the respondents, an open discussion with the patient and/or family took place afterwards.

Conclusions: This study shows that GPs, even in training, can be negatively impacted after a PSI. Only half of the respondents were involved in an open disclosure process, but the ones involved had a positive feeling after disclosure. More support is needed for health care professionals in the aftermath of a PSI in primary care, and this support could enhance their involvement in the open disclosure process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生作为患者安全事件第二受害者的公开披露:比利时佛兰德斯地区横断面研究》。
背景:人们已经深入研究了患者安全事故(PSI)对医院护士和医生的影响。然而,患者安全事故对全科医生的影响以及如何为这些医护人员提供支持却不太清楚:本研究旨在调查全科医生(培训中)个人卷入 PSI 事件的发生率,以及这些 PSI 事件的影响、所需的支持和事后的公开披露:这项横断面研究于 2022 年 1 月 3 日至 2022 年 3 月 5 日进行,抽样调查了比利时佛兰德地区的 78 名全科医生或正在接受培训的全科医生。参与者填写了80%以上的调查问卷,调查内容包括前一年和整个职业生涯中参与PSI的情况,以及在情绪症状、态度、所需支持和公开披露等方面的影响:共有 78 名接受培训的全科医生填写了调查问卷,其中 87.2% 的人在其整个职业生涯中都曾卷入过 PSI,55.1% 的人在上一年卷入过 PSI。这类 PSI 往往导致病人永久性伤害或死亡。最令全科医生难以忘怀的 PSI 事件给全科医生带来了许多负面影响,如过度警惕(88.2%)、内疚感(82.4%)、压力感(79.4%)和羞耻感(75.0%)。超过半数的受访者希望得到实质性的澄清(64.4%),51.7%的受访者在事后与患者和/或家属进行了公开讨论:本研究表明,即使是正在接受培训的全科医生,在发生 PSI 后也会受到负面影响。只有一半的受访者参与了公开披露过程,但参与披露的受访者在披露后有积极的感受。在基层医疗机构发生 PSI 后,需要为医护专业人员提供更多支持,这种支持可以提高他们对公开披露过程的参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
期刊最新文献
Patient Falls in the Operating Room: The Danger of an Obese Patient on an Unlocked Operating Room Table. Decreasing Hospital-acquired Pressure Injuries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A 5-step Quality Improvement Approach. Situational Analysis of the Medication Practices in Brazilian Hospitals: A Multicenter Study. The Relationship Between Medical Error Attitudes of Surgical Nurses and Evidence-Based Work Environment. It's Called "Informed Consent," But How "Informed" Are Patients? A Patient Perspective on Informed Consent in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1