Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Inhaler Triple Therapy on Mortality and Cardiopulmonary Risk Reduction in COPD: The SKOPOS-MAZI Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.11.007
Michael Pollack, Eleni Rapsomaniki, Antonio Anzueto, Kirsty Rhodes, Nathaniel M Hawkins, Claus F Vogelmeier, Jonathan Marshall, Hana Müllerová
{"title":"Effectiveness of Single Versus Multiple Inhaler Triple Therapy on Mortality and Cardiopulmonary Risk Reduction in COPD: The SKOPOS-MAZI Study.","authors":"Michael Pollack, Eleni Rapsomaniki, Antonio Anzueto, Kirsty Rhodes, Nathaniel M Hawkins, Claus F Vogelmeier, Jonathan Marshall, Hana Müllerová","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have elevated cardiopulmonary and mortality risk, particularly following exacerbations. While single inhaler triple therapies (SITTs), such as budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF), reduce cardiopulmonary risk versus dual bronchodilator therapy, there is limited evidence comparing outcomes with SITTs versus multiple inhaler triple therapies (MITTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SKOPOS-MAZI was a retrospective comparative effectiveness study in patients with COPD aged ≥40 years using US administrative claims data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. The primary and secondary endpoints were time to all-cause mortality and time to first severe cardiopulmonary event following initiation of BGF or MITT (identification period: October 1, 2020-June 30, 2023; index date: first prescription fill). Relative hazards of outcomes were assessed until a censoring event using Cox proportional hazards models, with inverse propensity treatment weighting accounting for between-group imbalances (standardized mean difference >0.1) in baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the primary cohort, risk (hazard ratio [95% confidence intervals]) of all-cause mortality and a first severe cardiopulmonary event were 18% (0.82 [0.75, 0.91]) and 12% (0.88 [0.83, 0.93]) lower in patients initiating BGF versus MITT; results were consistent across censoring definitions, landmark periods, and sensitivity cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world comparative effectiveness study of patients with COPD initiating BGF or MITT, BGF was associated with lower all-cause mortality and severe cardiopulmonary event risk versus MITT after accounting for between-group differences in baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. This study supports the benefits of BGF over MITT and the need to consider proactive use of SITTs in COPD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.11.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have elevated cardiopulmonary and mortality risk, particularly following exacerbations. While single inhaler triple therapies (SITTs), such as budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate (BGF), reduce cardiopulmonary risk versus dual bronchodilator therapy, there is limited evidence comparing outcomes with SITTs versus multiple inhaler triple therapies (MITTs).

Methods: SKOPOS-MAZI was a retrospective comparative effectiveness study in patients with COPD aged ≥40 years using US administrative claims data from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database. The primary and secondary endpoints were time to all-cause mortality and time to first severe cardiopulmonary event following initiation of BGF or MITT (identification period: October 1, 2020-June 30, 2023; index date: first prescription fill). Relative hazards of outcomes were assessed until a censoring event using Cox proportional hazards models, with inverse propensity treatment weighting accounting for between-group imbalances (standardized mean difference >0.1) in baseline characteristics.

Results: In the primary cohort, risk (hazard ratio [95% confidence intervals]) of all-cause mortality and a first severe cardiopulmonary event were 18% (0.82 [0.75, 0.91]) and 12% (0.88 [0.83, 0.93]) lower in patients initiating BGF versus MITT; results were consistent across censoring definitions, landmark periods, and sensitivity cohorts.

Conclusion: In this real-world comparative effectiveness study of patients with COPD initiating BGF or MITT, BGF was associated with lower all-cause mortality and severe cardiopulmonary event risk versus MITT after accounting for between-group differences in baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. This study supports the benefits of BGF over MITT and the need to consider proactive use of SITTs in COPD management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单吸入器与多吸入器三联疗法对降低慢性阻塞性肺病死亡率和心肺风险的效果:SKOPOS-MAZI 研究。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的心肺功能和死亡风险较高,尤其是在病情加重后。布地奈德/甘草酸苷/富马酸福莫特罗(BGF)等单吸入器三联疗法(SITTs)与双支气管扩张剂疗法相比可降低心肺风险,但比较单吸入器三联疗法与多吸入器三联疗法(MITTs)疗效的证据却很有限:SKOPOS-MAZI是一项回顾性疗效比较研究,研究对象是年龄≥40岁的慢性阻塞性肺病患者,研究使用了Optum去标识化Clinformatics®数据集市数据库中的美国行政索赔数据。主要和次要终点是开始使用 BGF 或 MITT 后的全因死亡时间和首次严重心肺事件发生时间(识别期:2020 年 10 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日):识别期:2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 30 日;指标日期:首次开具处方)。使用 Cox 比例危险度模型评估结果的相对危险度,直至发生剔除事件,并采用逆倾向治疗加权法考虑组间基线特征的不平衡(标准化平均差大于 0.1):在主要队列中,开始接受 BGF 治疗的患者与接受 MITT 治疗的患者相比,全因死亡率和首次严重心肺事件的风险(危险比 [95% 置信区间])分别降低了 18% (0.82 [0.75, 0.91])和 12% (0.88 [0.83, 0.93]);在不同的剔除定义、标志性时期和敏感性队列中,结果是一致的:在这项针对开始使用 BGF 或 MITT 的慢性阻塞性肺病患者的真实世界比较有效性研究中,在考虑了基线社会人口学和临床特征的组间差异后,BGF 与 MITT 相比,具有更低的全因死亡率和严重心肺事件风险,这支持了 BGF 优于 MITT 的益处,以及在慢性阻塞性肺病管理中考虑积极使用 SITT 的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
期刊最新文献
Cardioesophageal Reflex. Should it trigger clinician's response? Caught in Transit: Thrombus Trapped in a Patent Foramen Ovale. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with nonrheumatic streptococcal pharyngitis associated myocarditis. Gut Microbiome Modulation in Allergy Treatment: The Role of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. The "Silk Road" that leads to Infliximab: A severe case of Behçet's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1