Safety and Efficacy of Immunization with a Late-Liver-Stage Attenuated Malaria Parasite.

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2313892
Olivia A C Lamers, Blandine M D Franke-Fayard, Jan Pieter R Koopman, Geert V T Roozen, Jacqueline J Janse, Severine C Chevalley-Maurel, Fiona J A Geurten, Helena M de Bes-Roeleveld, Eva Iliopoulou, Emil Colstrup, Els Wessels, Geert-Jan van Gemert, Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer, Wouter Graumans, Thabitha R Stoter, Benjamin G Mordmüller, Emma L Houlder, Teun Bousema, Rajagopal Murugan, Matthew B B McCall, Chris J Janse, Meta Roestenberg
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Immunization with a Late-Liver-Stage Attenuated Malaria Parasite.","authors":"Olivia A C Lamers, Blandine M D Franke-Fayard, Jan Pieter R Koopman, Geert V T Roozen, Jacqueline J Janse, Severine C Chevalley-Maurel, Fiona J A Geurten, Helena M de Bes-Roeleveld, Eva Iliopoulou, Emil Colstrup, Els Wessels, Geert-Jan van Gemert, Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer, Wouter Graumans, Thabitha R Stoter, Benjamin G Mordmüller, Emma L Houlder, Teun Bousema, Rajagopal Murugan, Matthew B B McCall, Chris J Janse, Meta Roestenberg","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2313892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently licensed and approved malaria subunit vaccines provide modest, short-lived protection against malaria. Immunization with live-attenuated <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> malaria parasites is an alternative vaccination strategy that has potential to improve protection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety, side-effect profile, and efficacy of immunization, by means of mosquito bites, with a second-generation genetically attenuated parasite (GA2) - a <i>mei2</i> single knockout <i>P. falciparum</i> NF54 parasite (sporozoite form) with extended development into the liver stage. After an open-label dose-escalation safety phase in which participants were exposed to the bites of 15 or 50 infected mosquitoes (stage A), healthy adults who had not had malaria were randomly assigned to be exposed to 50 mosquito bites per immunization of GA2, an early-arresting parasite (GA1), or placebo (bites from uninfected mosquitoes) (stage B). After the completion of three immunization sessions with 50 mosquito bites per session, we compared the protective efficacy of GA2 against homologous <i>P. falciparum</i> controlled human malaria infection with that of GA1 and placebo. The primary end points were the number and severity of adverse events (in stages A and B) and blood-stage parasitemia greater than 100 <i>P. falciparum</i> parasites per milliliter after bites from GA2-infected mosquitoes (in stage A) and after controlled human malaria infection (in stage B).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adverse events were similar across the trial groups. Protective efficacy against subsequent controlled human malaria infection was observed in 8 of 9 participants (89%) in the GA2 group, in 1 of 8 participants (13%) in the GA1 group, and in 0 of 3 participants in the placebo group. A significantly higher frequency of <i>P. falciparum</i>-specific polyfunctional CD4+ and Vδ2+ γδ T cells were observed among participants who received GA2 than among those who received GA1, whereas GA2 and GA1 induced similar antibody titers targeting the <i>P. falciparum</i> circumsporozoite protein.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small trial, GA2 was associated with a favorable immune induction profile and protective efficacy, findings that warrant further evaluation. (Funded by the Bontius Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04577066.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"391 20","pages":"1913-1923"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2313892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently licensed and approved malaria subunit vaccines provide modest, short-lived protection against malaria. Immunization with live-attenuated Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites is an alternative vaccination strategy that has potential to improve protection.

Methods: We conducted a double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety, side-effect profile, and efficacy of immunization, by means of mosquito bites, with a second-generation genetically attenuated parasite (GA2) - a mei2 single knockout P. falciparum NF54 parasite (sporozoite form) with extended development into the liver stage. After an open-label dose-escalation safety phase in which participants were exposed to the bites of 15 or 50 infected mosquitoes (stage A), healthy adults who had not had malaria were randomly assigned to be exposed to 50 mosquito bites per immunization of GA2, an early-arresting parasite (GA1), or placebo (bites from uninfected mosquitoes) (stage B). After the completion of three immunization sessions with 50 mosquito bites per session, we compared the protective efficacy of GA2 against homologous P. falciparum controlled human malaria infection with that of GA1 and placebo. The primary end points were the number and severity of adverse events (in stages A and B) and blood-stage parasitemia greater than 100 P. falciparum parasites per milliliter after bites from GA2-infected mosquitoes (in stage A) and after controlled human malaria infection (in stage B).

Results: Adverse events were similar across the trial groups. Protective efficacy against subsequent controlled human malaria infection was observed in 8 of 9 participants (89%) in the GA2 group, in 1 of 8 participants (13%) in the GA1 group, and in 0 of 3 participants in the placebo group. A significantly higher frequency of P. falciparum-specific polyfunctional CD4+ and Vδ2+ γδ T cells were observed among participants who received GA2 than among those who received GA1, whereas GA2 and GA1 induced similar antibody titers targeting the P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein.

Conclusions: In this small trial, GA2 was associated with a favorable immune induction profile and protective efficacy, findings that warrant further evaluation. (Funded by the Bontius Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04577066.).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期肝减毒疟疾寄生虫免疫接种的安全性和有效性
背景:目前许可和批准的疟疾亚单位疫苗可提供适度、短暂的疟疾保护。恶性疟原虫减毒活疫苗是一种替代疫苗接种策略,有可能提高保护效果:我们进行了一项双盲对照临床试验,以评估通过蚊虫叮咬免疫第二代基因减毒寄生虫(GA2)--mei2单基因敲除的恶性疟原虫NF54寄生虫(孢子虫形态)--的安全性、副作用和有效性。在开放标签剂量递增安全阶段,参与者被 15 或 50 只受感染蚊子叮咬(A 阶段),之后,未患疟疾的健康成年人被随机分配到每次被 50 只蚊子叮咬的 GA2、早期噬菌体寄生虫(GA1)或安慰剂(未感染蚊子的叮咬)免疫接种(B 阶段)。在完成每次 50 只蚊子叮咬的三次免疫后,我们比较了 GA2 与 GA1 和安慰剂对同源恶性疟原虫对照人类疟疾感染的保护效力。主要终点是被 GA2 感染的蚊子叮咬后(A 阶段)和受控人类疟疾感染后(B 阶段)不良事件的数量和严重程度(A 和 B 阶段)以及每毫升血液中恶性疟原虫寄生虫数大于 100 的血阶段寄生虫血症:各试验组的不良反应相似。在 GA2 组的 9 名参与者中,有 8 人(89%)观察到了对随后受控人类疟疾感染的保护效果;在 GA1 组的 8 名参与者中,有 1 人(13%)观察到了保护效果;在安慰剂组的 3 名参与者中,只有 0 人观察到了保护效果。接受GA2治疗的参与者中恶性疟原虫特异性多功能CD4+和Vδ2+ γδ T细胞的频率明显高于接受GA1治疗的参与者,而GA2和GA1诱导的针对恶性疟原虫环孢子虫蛋白的抗体滴度相似:结论:在这项小型试验中,GA2具有良好的免疫诱导特征和保护效力,值得进一步评估。(由 Bontius 基金会资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT04577066)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Eiffel-by-Night Sign. Invisible Deaths - Mortality among People Experiencing Homelessness. Mind the Sentinel - Applying Patient-Safety Paradigms to Clinician Well-Being. Saint Didacus, Fetal Death, and the Problem of Dual Loyalty. Diagnostic Complexity in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Thrombotic Significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1