Pub Date : 2024-11-07Epub Date: 2024-06-19DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2404139
Georgina V Long, Axel Hauschild, Mario Santinami, John M Kirkwood, Victoria Atkinson, Mario Mandala, Barbara Merelli, Vanna Chiarion Sileni, Marta Nyakas, Andrew Haydon, Caroline Dutriaux, Caroline Robert, Laurent Mortier, Jacob Schachter, Dirk Schadendorf, Thierry Lesimple, Ruth Plummer, James Larkin, Monique Tan, Sachin Bajirao Adnaik, Paul Burgess, Tarveen Jandoo, Reinhard Dummer
Background: The 5-year results of this trial showed that adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in longer relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with BRAF V600-mutated stage III melanoma. Longer-term data were needed, including data regarding overall survival.
Methods: We randomly assigned 870 patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations to receive 12 months of dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. Here, we report the final results of this trial, including results for overall survival, melanoma-specific survival, relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival.
Results: The median duration of follow-up was 8.33 years for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 6.87 years for placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo, although the benefit was not significant (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.01; P = 0.06 by stratified log-rank test). A consistent survival benefit was seen across several prespecified subgroups, including the 792 patients with melanoma with a BRAF V600E mutation (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.96). Relapse-free survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.63), as did distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.71). No new safety signals were reported, a finding consistent with previous trial reports.
Conclusions: After nearly 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib was associated with better relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with resected stage III melanoma. The analysis of overall survival showed that the risk of death was 20% lower with combination therapy than with placebo, but the benefit was not significant. Among patients with melanoma with a BRAF V600E mutation, the results suggest that the risk of death was 25% lower with combination therapy. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).
{"title":"Final Results for Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III Melanoma.","authors":"Georgina V Long, Axel Hauschild, Mario Santinami, John M Kirkwood, Victoria Atkinson, Mario Mandala, Barbara Merelli, Vanna Chiarion Sileni, Marta Nyakas, Andrew Haydon, Caroline Dutriaux, Caroline Robert, Laurent Mortier, Jacob Schachter, Dirk Schadendorf, Thierry Lesimple, Ruth Plummer, James Larkin, Monique Tan, Sachin Bajirao Adnaik, Paul Burgess, Tarveen Jandoo, Reinhard Dummer","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2404139","DOIUrl":"10.1056/NEJMoa2404139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 5-year results of this trial showed that adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in longer relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with <i>BRAF</i> V600-mutated stage III melanoma. Longer-term data were needed, including data regarding overall survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned 870 patients with resected stage III melanoma with <i>BRAF</i> V600 mutations to receive 12 months of dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. Here, we report the final results of this trial, including results for overall survival, melanoma-specific survival, relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median duration of follow-up was 8.33 years for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 6.87 years for placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo, although the benefit was not significant (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.01; P = 0.06 by stratified log-rank test). A consistent survival benefit was seen across several prespecified subgroups, including the 792 patients with melanoma with a <i>BRAF</i> V600E mutation (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.96). Relapse-free survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.63), as did distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.71). No new safety signals were reported, a finding consistent with previous trial reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After nearly 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib was associated with better relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with resected stage III melanoma. The analysis of overall survival showed that the risk of death was 20% lower with combination therapy than with placebo, but the benefit was not significant. Among patients with melanoma with a <i>BRAF</i> V600E mutation, the results suggest that the risk of death was 25% lower with combination therapy. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141428299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Frailty in Older Adults.","authors":"Ziwei Zheng, Shaoling Yang","doi":"10.1056/NEJMc2411327","DOIUrl":"10.1056/NEJMc2411327","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karin Brandell, Tagrid Jar-Allah, John Reynolds-Wright, Helena Kopp Kallner, Helena Hognert, Frida Gyllenberg, Janina Kaislasuo, Anand Tamang, Heera Tuladhar, Clare Boerma, Karen Schimanski, Gillian Gibson, Mette Løkeland, Pia Teleman, Marie Bixo, Mette Mandrup Kjaer, Ervin Kallfa, Johan Bring, Oskari Heikinheimo, Sharon Cameron, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Background: Medication abortion, with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, is highly effective and safe. However, there is insufficient evidence on efficacy and safety at very early gestations before a pregnancy can be visualized with ultrasonography.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial involving women requesting medication abortion at up to 42 days of gestation with an unconfirmed intrauterine pregnancy on ultrasound examination (visualized as an empty cavity or a sac-like structure without a yolk sac or embryonic pole). Participants were randomly assigned to either immediate start of abortion (early-start group) or standard-care treatment delayed until intrauterine pregnancy was confirmed (standard group). The primary outcome was complete abortion. The noninferiority margin was set at 3.0 percentage points for the absolute between-group difference.
Results: In total, 1504 women were included at 26 sites in nine countries and were randomly assigned to the early-start group (754 participants) or the standard group (750 participants). In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete abortion occurred in 676 of 710 participants (95.2%) in the early-start group and in 656 of 688 (95.3%) in the standard group; the absolute between-group difference was -0.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -2.4 to 2.1). Ectopic pregnancies occurred in 10 of 741 participants (1.3%) in the early-start group and in 6 of 724 (0.8%) in the standard group, with one rupture before diagnosis (early-start group). Serious adverse events occurred in 12 of 737 participants (1.6%) in the early-start group and in 5 of 718 (0.7%) in the standard group (P = 0.10); the majority were uncomplicated hospitalizations for treatment of ectopic pregnancy or incomplete abortion.
Conclusions: Medication abortion before confirmed intrauterine pregnancy was noninferior to standard, delayed treatment with respect to complete abortion. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; VEMA EudraCT number, 2018-003675-35; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03989869.).
{"title":"Randomized Trial of Very Early Medication Abortion.","authors":"Karin Brandell, Tagrid Jar-Allah, John Reynolds-Wright, Helena Kopp Kallner, Helena Hognert, Frida Gyllenberg, Janina Kaislasuo, Anand Tamang, Heera Tuladhar, Clare Boerma, Karen Schimanski, Gillian Gibson, Mette Løkeland, Pia Teleman, Marie Bixo, Mette Mandrup Kjaer, Ervin Kallfa, Johan Bring, Oskari Heikinheimo, Sharon Cameron, Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2401646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2401646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication abortion, with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol, is highly effective and safe. However, there is insufficient evidence on efficacy and safety at very early gestations before a pregnancy can be visualized with ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized, controlled trial involving women requesting medication abortion at up to 42 days of gestation with an unconfirmed intrauterine pregnancy on ultrasound examination (visualized as an empty cavity or a sac-like structure without a yolk sac or embryonic pole). Participants were randomly assigned to either immediate start of abortion (early-start group) or standard-care treatment delayed until intrauterine pregnancy was confirmed (standard group). The primary outcome was complete abortion. The noninferiority margin was set at 3.0 percentage points for the absolute between-group difference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1504 women were included at 26 sites in nine countries and were randomly assigned to the early-start group (754 participants) or the standard group (750 participants). In an intention-to-treat analysis, a complete abortion occurred in 676 of 710 participants (95.2%) in the early-start group and in 656 of 688 (95.3%) in the standard group; the absolute between-group difference was -0.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -2.4 to 2.1). Ectopic pregnancies occurred in 10 of 741 participants (1.3%) in the early-start group and in 6 of 724 (0.8%) in the standard group, with one rupture before diagnosis (early-start group). Serious adverse events occurred in 12 of 737 participants (1.6%) in the early-start group and in 5 of 718 (0.7%) in the standard group (P = 0.10); the majority were uncomplicated hospitalizations for treatment of ectopic pregnancy or incomplete abortion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medication abortion before confirmed intrauterine pregnancy was noninferior to standard, delayed treatment with respect to complete abortion. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; VEMA EudraCT number, 2018-003675-35; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03989869.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsb2408466
E Wesley Ely, Lisa M Brown, Harvey V Fineberg
{"title":"Long Covid Defined.","authors":"E Wesley Ely, Lisa M Brown, Harvey V Fineberg","doi":"10.1056/NEJMsb2408466","DOIUrl":"10.1056/NEJMsb2408466","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07Epub Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2407791
Vijay Kunadian, Helen Mossop, Carol Shields, Michelle Bardgett, Philippa Watts, M Dawn Teare, Jonathan Pritchard, Jennifer Adams-Hall, Craig Runnett, David P Ripley, Justin Carter, Julie Quigley, Justin Cooke, David Austin, Jerry Murphy, Damian Kelly, James McGowan, Murugapathy Veerasamy, Dirk Felmeden, Hussain Contractor, Sanjay Mutgi, John Irving, Steven Lindsay, Gavin Galasko, Kelvin Lee, Ayyaz Sultan, Amardeep G Dastidar, Shazia Hussain, Iftikhar Ul Haq, Mark de Belder, Martin Denvir, Marcus Flather, Robert F Storey, David E Newby, Stuart J Pocock, Keith A A Fox
Background: Whether a conservative strategy of medical therapy alone or a strategy of medical therapy plus invasive treatment is more beneficial in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial involving patients 75 years of age or older with NSTEMI at 48 sites in the United Kingdom. The patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a conservative strategy of the best available medical therapy or an invasive strategy of coronary angiography and revascularization plus the best available medical therapy. Patients who were frail or had a high burden of coexisting conditions were eligible. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes (cardiovascular death) or nonfatal myocardial infarction assessed in a time-to-event analysis.
Results: A total of 1518 patients underwent randomization; 753 patients were assigned to the invasive-strategy group and 765 to the conservative-strategy group. The mean age of the patients was 82 years, 45% were women, and 32% were frail. A primary-outcome event occurred in 193 patients (25.6%) in the invasive-strategy group and 201 patients (26.3%) in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.14; P = 0.53) over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Cardiovascular death occurred in 15.8% of the patients in the invasive-strategy group and 14.2% of the patients in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.44). Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 11.7% in the invasive-strategy group and 15.0% in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99). Procedural complications occurred in less than 1% of the patients.
Conclusions: In older adults with NSTEMI, an invasive strategy did not result in a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (the composite primary outcome) than a conservative strategy over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation; BHF SENIOR-RITA ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN11343602.).
{"title":"Invasive Treatment Strategy for Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Vijay Kunadian, Helen Mossop, Carol Shields, Michelle Bardgett, Philippa Watts, M Dawn Teare, Jonathan Pritchard, Jennifer Adams-Hall, Craig Runnett, David P Ripley, Justin Carter, Julie Quigley, Justin Cooke, David Austin, Jerry Murphy, Damian Kelly, James McGowan, Murugapathy Veerasamy, Dirk Felmeden, Hussain Contractor, Sanjay Mutgi, John Irving, Steven Lindsay, Gavin Galasko, Kelvin Lee, Ayyaz Sultan, Amardeep G Dastidar, Shazia Hussain, Iftikhar Ul Haq, Mark de Belder, Martin Denvir, Marcus Flather, Robert F Storey, David E Newby, Stuart J Pocock, Keith A A Fox","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2407791","DOIUrl":"10.1056/NEJMoa2407791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether a conservative strategy of medical therapy alone or a strategy of medical therapy plus invasive treatment is more beneficial in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial involving patients 75 years of age or older with NSTEMI at 48 sites in the United Kingdom. The patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a conservative strategy of the best available medical therapy or an invasive strategy of coronary angiography and revascularization plus the best available medical therapy. Patients who were frail or had a high burden of coexisting conditions were eligible. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes (cardiovascular death) or nonfatal myocardial infarction assessed in a time-to-event analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1518 patients underwent randomization; 753 patients were assigned to the invasive-strategy group and 765 to the conservative-strategy group. The mean age of the patients was 82 years, 45% were women, and 32% were frail. A primary-outcome event occurred in 193 patients (25.6%) in the invasive-strategy group and 201 patients (26.3%) in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.14; P = 0.53) over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Cardiovascular death occurred in 15.8% of the patients in the invasive-strategy group and 14.2% of the patients in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.44). Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 11.7% in the invasive-strategy group and 15.0% in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99). Procedural complications occurred in less than 1% of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older adults with NSTEMI, an invasive strategy did not result in a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (the composite primary outcome) than a conservative strategy over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation; BHF SENIOR-RITA ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN11343602.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07Epub Date: 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2410900
Eric J Rubin, Jane Leopold, Stephen Morrissey
{"title":"NEJM at ESC - Invasive versus Conservative Strategy for Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Eric J Rubin, Jane Leopold, Stephen Morrissey","doi":"10.1056/NEJMe2410900","DOIUrl":"10.1056/NEJMe2410900","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142121195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cody E Cotner, Richard M Stone, Amy C Sherman, Katherine H Walker, Joseph Loscalzo
{"title":"Two Sides to the Story.","authors":"Cody E Cotner, Richard M Stone, Amy C Sherman, Katherine H Walker, Joseph Loscalzo","doi":"10.1056/NEJMcps2400493","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcps2400493","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-07Epub Date: 2024-07-31DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe2409293
Eric J Rubin, Victor J Dzau
{"title":"From Evidence to Policy - Finding Authoritative Sources of Information on Health.","authors":"Eric J Rubin, Victor J Dzau","doi":"10.1056/NEJMe2409293","DOIUrl":"10.1056/NEJMe2409293","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861652","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Frailty in Older Adults.","authors":"Nir Y Krakauer, Jesse C Krakauer","doi":"10.1056/NEJMc2411327","DOIUrl":"10.1056/NEJMc2411327","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Uterine Fibroids.","authors":"Elizabeth A Stewart, Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso","doi":"10.1056/NEJMcp2309623","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp2309623","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}