A stochastic population model for the impact of cancer cell dormancy on therapy success

IF 1.9 4区 数学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of Theoretical Biology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111995
Jochen Blath , Anna Kraut , Tobias Paul , András Tóbiás
{"title":"A stochastic population model for the impact of cancer cell dormancy on therapy success","authors":"Jochen Blath ,&nbsp;Anna Kraut ,&nbsp;Tobias Paul ,&nbsp;András Tóbiás","doi":"10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Therapy evasion – and subsequent disease progression – is a major challenge in current oncology. An important role in this context seems to be played by various forms of cancer cell dormancy. For example, therapy-induced dormancy, over short timescales, can create serious obstacles to aggressive treatment approaches such as chemotherapy, and long-term dormancy may lead to relapses and metastases even many years after an initially successful treatment.</div><div>In this paper, we focus on individual cancer cells switching into and out of a dormant state both spontaneously as well as in response to treatment. We introduce an idealized mathematical model, based on stochastic agent-based interactions, for the dynamics of cancer cell populations involving individual short-term dormancy, and allow for a range of (multi-drug) therapy protocols. Our analysis – based on simulations of the many-particle limit – shows that in our model, depending on the specific underlying dormancy mechanism, even a small initial population (of explicitly quantifiable size) of dormant cells can lead to therapy failure under classical single-drug treatments that would successfully eradicate the tumour in the absence of dormancy. We further investigate and quantify the effectiveness of several multi-drug regimes (manipulating dormant cancer cells in specific ways, including increasing or decreasing resuscitation rates or targeting dormant cells directly). Relying on quantitative results for concrete simulation parameters, we provide some general basic rules for the design of (multi-)drug treatment protocols depending on the types and processes of dormancy mechanisms present in the population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","volume":"597 ","pages":"Article 111995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519324002807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapy evasion – and subsequent disease progression – is a major challenge in current oncology. An important role in this context seems to be played by various forms of cancer cell dormancy. For example, therapy-induced dormancy, over short timescales, can create serious obstacles to aggressive treatment approaches such as chemotherapy, and long-term dormancy may lead to relapses and metastases even many years after an initially successful treatment.
In this paper, we focus on individual cancer cells switching into and out of a dormant state both spontaneously as well as in response to treatment. We introduce an idealized mathematical model, based on stochastic agent-based interactions, for the dynamics of cancer cell populations involving individual short-term dormancy, and allow for a range of (multi-drug) therapy protocols. Our analysis – based on simulations of the many-particle limit – shows that in our model, depending on the specific underlying dormancy mechanism, even a small initial population (of explicitly quantifiable size) of dormant cells can lead to therapy failure under classical single-drug treatments that would successfully eradicate the tumour in the absence of dormancy. We further investigate and quantify the effectiveness of several multi-drug regimes (manipulating dormant cancer cells in specific ways, including increasing or decreasing resuscitation rates or targeting dormant cells directly). Relying on quantitative results for concrete simulation parameters, we provide some general basic rules for the design of (multi-)drug treatment protocols depending on the types and processes of dormancy mechanisms present in the population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌细胞休眠对治疗成功率影响的随机群体模型。
逃避治疗--以及随后的疾病进展--是当前肿瘤学面临的一大挑战。在这种情况下,各种形式的癌细胞休眠似乎发挥了重要作用。例如,治疗诱导的短时间休眠会严重阻碍化疗等积极治疗方法,而长期休眠则可能导致复发和转移,甚至在最初的成功治疗多年后仍是如此。在本文中,我们将重点研究单个癌细胞自发地以及在治疗过程中进出休眠状态的情况。我们引入了一个理想化的数学模型,该模型以随机代理互动为基础,适用于涉及个体短期休眠的癌细胞群动态,并允许一系列(多种药物)治疗方案。我们的分析--基于多粒子极限的模拟--表明,在我们的模型中,根据特定的潜在休眠机制,即使是很小的(可明确量化的)初始休眠细胞群也会导致经典单药治疗的失败,而在没有休眠的情况下,这些单药治疗会成功根除肿瘤。我们进一步研究并量化了几种多药治疗方案的有效性(以特定方式操纵休眠癌细胞,包括提高或降低复苏率或直接针对休眠细胞)。根据具体模拟参数的量化结果,我们提供了设计(多种)药物治疗方案的一些一般基本规则,这些规则取决于群体中存在的休眠机制的类型和过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Theoretical Biology is the leading forum for theoretical perspectives that give insight into biological processes. It covers a very wide range of topics and is of interest to biologists in many areas of research, including: • Brain and Neuroscience • Cancer Growth and Treatment • Cell Biology • Developmental Biology • Ecology • Evolution • Immunology, • Infectious and non-infectious Diseases, • Mathematical, Computational, Biophysical and Statistical Modeling • Microbiology, Molecular Biology, and Biochemistry • Networks and Complex Systems • Physiology • Pharmacodynamics • Animal Behavior and Game Theory Acceptable papers are those that bear significant importance on the biology per se being presented, and not on the mathematical analysis. Papers that include some data or experimental material bearing on theory will be considered, including those that contain comparative study, statistical data analysis, mathematical proof, computer simulations, experiments, field observations, or even philosophical arguments, which are all methods to support or reject theoretical ideas. However, there should be a concerted effort to make papers intelligible to biologists in the chosen field.
期刊最新文献
Impact of evolutionary relatedness on species diversification and tree shape. Beyond predation: Fish-coral interactions can tip the scales of coral disease. Bridging Wright-Fisher and Moran models. From Bayes to Darwin: Evolutionary search as an exaptation from sampling-based Bayesian inference. Analysis of electrical activities in a functional neuron with dual memristors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1