Warfarin and Aspirin Versus Warfarin Alone in Patients With HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/pace.15110
Patricia Viana, Lucca Moreira Lopes, Thamiris Dias Delfino Cabral, Jorge Persson, Vanessa de Oliveira Tapioca, Camila Veronica S Freire, Jessica Hoffmann Relvas, Yasmin Mesquita, Isabela Reis Marques, Wilton Francisco Gomes
{"title":"Warfarin and Aspirin Versus Warfarin Alone in Patients With HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Patricia Viana, Lucca Moreira Lopes, Thamiris Dias Delfino Cabral, Jorge Persson, Vanessa de Oliveira Tapioca, Camila Veronica S Freire, Jessica Hoffmann Relvas, Yasmin Mesquita, Isabela Reis Marques, Wilton Francisco Gomes","doi":"10.1111/pace.15110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>HeartMate 3 (HM3), a fully magnetically levitated ventricular assist device (LVAD), has been associated with reduced thromboembolic events compared to HeartMate II. However, bleeding events remained significant. Among patients undergoing HM3 implantation, the standard antithrombotic regimen comprises both warfarin and aspirin (ASA), but there is a lack of evidence on the optimum antithrombotic therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the impact of combined ASA and warfarin therapy compared to warfarin alone on the incidence of non-surgical bleeding events in patients with HM3 LVAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing warfarin alone with warfarin combined with ASA in patients with HM3 LVAD. Binary endpoints were analyzed using computed risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effect model was applied for all endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies (one RCT and four observational) encompassing 869 patients were included, with 424 (48.8%) prescribed warfarin alone, and 662 (76.2%) being male. Compared with the combined anticoagulation regimen, warfarin alone significantly reduced non-surgical bleeding (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.09-0.95; p = 0.04) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12-0.58; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for all-cause mortality (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.45-2.32; p = 0.963).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that the use of warfarin alone for anticoagulation in HM3 patients is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding events when compared to the combined therapy with ASA.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: HeartMate 3 (HM3), a fully magnetically levitated ventricular assist device (LVAD), has been associated with reduced thromboembolic events compared to HeartMate II. However, bleeding events remained significant. Among patients undergoing HM3 implantation, the standard antithrombotic regimen comprises both warfarin and aspirin (ASA), but there is a lack of evidence on the optimum antithrombotic therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the impact of combined ASA and warfarin therapy compared to warfarin alone on the incidence of non-surgical bleeding events in patients with HM3 LVAD.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing warfarin alone with warfarin combined with ASA in patients with HM3 LVAD. Binary endpoints were analyzed using computed risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effect model was applied for all endpoints.

Results: Five studies (one RCT and four observational) encompassing 869 patients were included, with 424 (48.8%) prescribed warfarin alone, and 662 (76.2%) being male. Compared with the combined anticoagulation regimen, warfarin alone significantly reduced non-surgical bleeding (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.09-0.95; p = 0.04) and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.26; 95% CI 0.12-0.58; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for all-cause mortality (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.45-2.32; p = 0.963).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the use of warfarin alone for anticoagulation in HM3 patients is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding events when compared to the combined therapy with ASA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 HeartMate 3 左心室辅助装置的患者服用华法林和阿司匹林与单用华法林的比较:系统综述与元分析》。
背景和目的:HeartMate 3(HM3)是一种全磁悬浮心室辅助装置(LVAD),与 HeartMate II 相比,其血栓栓塞事件有所减少。但是,出血事件仍然很严重。在接受 HM3 植入术的患者中,标准的抗血栓治疗方案包括华法林和阿司匹林(ASA),但目前还缺乏最佳抗血栓治疗的证据。我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,评估了与单独使用华法林相比,联合使用 ASA 和华法林对 HM3 LVAD 患者非手术出血事件发生率的影响:在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中检索了在 HM3 LVAD 患者中比较单独使用华法林与华法林联合 ASA 的随机对照试验 (RCT) 和观察性研究。二元终点采用计算风险比 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 进行分析。所有终点均采用随机效应模型:共纳入五项研究(一项 RCT 和四项观察性研究),涵盖 869 名患者,其中 424 人(48.8%)单独使用华法林,662 人(76.2%)为男性。与联合抗凝方案相比,单独使用华法林可显著减少非手术出血(RR 0.30;95% CI 0.09-0.95;P = 0.04)和胃肠道出血(RR 0.26;95% CI 0.12-0.58;P我们的研究结果表明,与 ASA 联合治疗相比,HM3 患者单独使用华法林进行抗凝治疗可降低出血事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm Is Associated With Lower Incidence of Stroke in Patients With Drug-Refractory Atrial Fibrillation. Warfarin and Aspirin Versus Warfarin Alone in Patients With HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. A Case of Very Early Lead Fracture in an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: Management and Follow-Up. A narrow complex tachycardia with a short HV interval: What is the mechanism? Atrioventricular Block in the Setting of Immune Myocarditis: A Pragmatic Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1