Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory.

Najib Aziz, Erik LaBelle, Beth D Jamieson, Matthew J Mimiaga, Roger Detels
{"title":"Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory.","authors":"Najib Aziz, Erik LaBelle, Beth D Jamieson, Matthew J Mimiaga, Roger Detels","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lymphocyte phenotyping is a valuable tool for monitoring the effects of antiretroviral therapy on individuals living with HIV-1. A switch study was conducted to compare T-cell subset quantification performed by a research laboratory and a diagnostic, laboratory to understand the impact on the retrospective and prospective results of a long-term study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using FACSCanto II Flow Cytometers, EDTA anticoagulated peripheral blood from 73 males enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/Women Interagency HIV Combined Cohort Study was analyzed by both a research (laboratory 1) and a diagnostics laboratory (laboratory 2) for quantification of cluster of differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 T-cells. There were 47 males living with and 26 living without HIV-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman (B-A) analysis was applied to assess the agreement between laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 results. There were 69 out of 73 CD3, 71 out of 73CD4, and 72 out of 73 CD8 T-cell results that fell within acceptable B-A limits of agreement. The mean differences between the 2 laboratories were -1.000, -0.945, and +0.685(%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strong agreement between results from laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 for CD3, CD4, and CD8 T-cell percentage suggests that the difference between laboratories using the same instrumentation and methodology will have a minimal effect on long-term study results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lymphocyte phenotyping is a valuable tool for monitoring the effects of antiretroviral therapy on individuals living with HIV-1. A switch study was conducted to compare T-cell subset quantification performed by a research laboratory and a diagnostic, laboratory to understand the impact on the retrospective and prospective results of a long-term study.

Methods: Using FACSCanto II Flow Cytometers, EDTA anticoagulated peripheral blood from 73 males enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/Women Interagency HIV Combined Cohort Study was analyzed by both a research (laboratory 1) and a diagnostics laboratory (laboratory 2) for quantification of cluster of differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 T-cells. There were 47 males living with and 26 living without HIV-1.

Results: Bland-Altman (B-A) analysis was applied to assess the agreement between laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 results. There were 69 out of 73 CD3, 71 out of 73CD4, and 72 out of 73 CD8 T-cell results that fell within acceptable B-A limits of agreement. The mean differences between the 2 laboratories were -1.000, -0.945, and +0.685(%), respectively.

Conclusion: The strong agreement between results from laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 for CD3, CD4, and CD8 T-cell percentage suggests that the difference between laboratories using the same instrumentation and methodology will have a minimal effect on long-term study results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较诊断实验室和研究实验室的基本淋巴细胞表型结果。
目的:淋巴细胞表型分析是监测抗逆转录病毒疗法对 HIV-1 感染者影响的重要工具。我们进行了一项转换研究,比较研究实验室和诊断实验室进行的 T 细胞亚群定量,以了解对一项长期研究的回顾性和前瞻性结果的影响:使用 FACSCanto II 流式细胞仪,由研究实验室(实验室 1)和诊断实验室(实验室 2)对参加多中心艾滋病队列研究/妇女机构间艾滋病联合队列研究的 73 名男性的 EDTA 抗凝外周血进行分析,以量化分化簇 (CD)3、CD4 和 CD8 T 细胞。47 名男性感染者和 26 名男性未感染 HIV-1:结果:采用Bland-Altman(B-A)分析法评估实验室1和实验室2结果的一致性。73 个 CD3 细胞结果中有 69 个、73 个 CD4 细胞结果中有 71 个、73 个 CD8 T 细胞结果中有 72 个在可接受的 B-A 一致性范围内。两个实验室的平均差异分别为-1.000、-0.945和+0.685(%):结论:实验室 1 和实验室 2 的 CD3、CD4 和 CD8 T 细胞百分比结果非常一致,这表明使用相同仪器和方法的实验室之间的差异对长期研究结果的影响微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serologic detection of regenerating protein I alpha by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay and its clinical value in gastric cancer. Jerk (d(acceleration)/dt) as an operative variable in pneumatic tube transport (PTT). Therapeutic plasma exchange for hyperviscosity syndrome in IgA multiple myeloma. Navigating the conundrum of co-existing autoantibodies and alloantibodies in a case of Evans syndrome. Red blood cell alloimmunization in transfused patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective study from northern China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1