Najib Aziz, Erik LaBelle, Beth D Jamieson, Matthew J Mimiaga, Roger Detels
{"title":"Comparison of basic lymphocyte phenotype results between a diagnostic and a research laboratory.","authors":"Najib Aziz, Erik LaBelle, Beth D Jamieson, Matthew J Mimiaga, Roger Detels","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lymphocyte phenotyping is a valuable tool for monitoring the effects of antiretroviral therapy on individuals living with HIV-1. A switch study was conducted to compare T-cell subset quantification performed by a research laboratory and a diagnostic, laboratory to understand the impact on the retrospective and prospective results of a long-term study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using FACSCanto II Flow Cytometers, EDTA anticoagulated peripheral blood from 73 males enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/Women Interagency HIV Combined Cohort Study was analyzed by both a research (laboratory 1) and a diagnostics laboratory (laboratory 2) for quantification of cluster of differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 T-cells. There were 47 males living with and 26 living without HIV-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bland-Altman (B-A) analysis was applied to assess the agreement between laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 results. There were 69 out of 73 CD3, 71 out of 73CD4, and 72 out of 73 CD8 T-cell results that fell within acceptable B-A limits of agreement. The mean differences between the 2 laboratories were -1.000, -0.945, and +0.685(%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The strong agreement between results from laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 for CD3, CD4, and CD8 T-cell percentage suggests that the difference between laboratories using the same instrumentation and methodology will have a minimal effect on long-term study results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Lymphocyte phenotyping is a valuable tool for monitoring the effects of antiretroviral therapy on individuals living with HIV-1. A switch study was conducted to compare T-cell subset quantification performed by a research laboratory and a diagnostic, laboratory to understand the impact on the retrospective and prospective results of a long-term study.
Methods: Using FACSCanto II Flow Cytometers, EDTA anticoagulated peripheral blood from 73 males enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study/Women Interagency HIV Combined Cohort Study was analyzed by both a research (laboratory 1) and a diagnostics laboratory (laboratory 2) for quantification of cluster of differentiation (CD)3, CD4, and CD8 T-cells. There were 47 males living with and 26 living without HIV-1.
Results: Bland-Altman (B-A) analysis was applied to assess the agreement between laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 results. There were 69 out of 73 CD3, 71 out of 73CD4, and 72 out of 73 CD8 T-cell results that fell within acceptable B-A limits of agreement. The mean differences between the 2 laboratories were -1.000, -0.945, and +0.685(%), respectively.
Conclusion: The strong agreement between results from laboratory 1 and laboratory 2 for CD3, CD4, and CD8 T-cell percentage suggests that the difference between laboratories using the same instrumentation and methodology will have a minimal effect on long-term study results.