Performance analysis of refuse-derived fuel gasification plant with carbon capture and storage for power, heating, and hydrogen production

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1002/ep.14472
Dario Balaban, Jelena Lubura Stošić, Oskar Bera, Predrag Kojić
{"title":"Performance analysis of refuse-derived fuel gasification plant with carbon capture and storage for power, heating, and hydrogen production","authors":"Dario Balaban,&nbsp;Jelena Lubura Stošić,&nbsp;Oskar Bera,&nbsp;Predrag Kojić","doi":"10.1002/ep.14472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Among various waste-to-energy technologies, gasification is one of the most promising, because of high efficiency, feedstock flexibility, and carbon capture potential. This case study is focused on comprehensive analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle-based plant with refuse-derived fuel (RDF) as feedstock and carbon capture. As there are hardly any studies focused on simulation of waste gasification with carbon capture, most of which are lacking important process specifics, this study addresses existing research gap. Process flowsheets are developed in detail according to literature data for various process configurations and simulated in AspenPlus software, while obtained results on material and energy balance were used for estimation of plant efficiency and performance indicators. Waste generation data in Novi Sad, Serbia, were used for determination of RDF flowrate. Configurations include different syngas cleaning pathways, final products (power, heating, and hydrogen) and co-gasification with coal. Cogeneration increases overall plant efficiency from 27%–36% (power production only) to 63%–76%. High net hydrogen efficiencies, around 58%, compensate lower power and thermal energy production in hydrogen-based configurations. Overall, co-gasification produces better results due to higher feedstock heating value. Obtained results will be used in further research for environmental and economic evaluation to provide multi-level assessment of proposed processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"43 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among various waste-to-energy technologies, gasification is one of the most promising, because of high efficiency, feedstock flexibility, and carbon capture potential. This case study is focused on comprehensive analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle-based plant with refuse-derived fuel (RDF) as feedstock and carbon capture. As there are hardly any studies focused on simulation of waste gasification with carbon capture, most of which are lacking important process specifics, this study addresses existing research gap. Process flowsheets are developed in detail according to literature data for various process configurations and simulated in AspenPlus software, while obtained results on material and energy balance were used for estimation of plant efficiency and performance indicators. Waste generation data in Novi Sad, Serbia, were used for determination of RDF flowrate. Configurations include different syngas cleaning pathways, final products (power, heating, and hydrogen) and co-gasification with coal. Cogeneration increases overall plant efficiency from 27%–36% (power production only) to 63%–76%. High net hydrogen efficiencies, around 58%, compensate lower power and thermal energy production in hydrogen-based configurations. Overall, co-gasification produces better results due to higher feedstock heating value. Obtained results will be used in further research for environmental and economic evaluation to provide multi-level assessment of proposed processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于发电、供热和制氢的带碳捕集与封存功能的垃圾衍生燃料气化厂性能分析
在各种垃圾发电技术中,气化技术因其高效率、原料灵活性和碳捕集潜力而成为最有前途的技术之一。本案例研究的重点是全面分析以垃圾衍生燃料(RDF)为原料和碳捕集的综合气化联合循环发电厂。由于几乎没有任何研究侧重于模拟垃圾气化与碳捕集,其中大部分研究都缺乏重要的工艺细节,因此本研究填补了现有的研究空白。根据各种工艺配置的文献数据详细制定了工艺流程表,并在 AspenPlus 软件中进行了模拟,同时将获得的物料和能量平衡结果用于估算工厂效率和性能指标。塞尔维亚诺维萨德的废物产生数据用于确定 RDF 流量。配置包括不同的合成气净化途径、最终产品(发电、供热和制氢)以及与煤的联合气化。热电联产将工厂的整体效率从 27%-36%(仅发电)提高到 63%-76%。氢气净效率高,约为 58%,弥补了氢基配置中电力和热能生产的不足。总体而言,由于原料热值较高,联合气化产生的效果更好。获得的结果将用于进一步的环境和经济评估研究,以便对拟议的工艺进行多层次评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - Cover and Table of Contents Issue Information - Info for Authors Comparison of environmental and health acceptability of squatting and sitting toilets: A review Production and recycling of blast furnace slag: A life cycle assessment approach in India Incorporation of trace metals in Hanford waste boehmite mineral phases and dissolution rate impacts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1