{"title":"Is Chinaʼs Capital Liberalisation Policy Effective?","authors":"Lirong Wang, Jinnan Zhou, C. James Hueng","doi":"10.1002/app5.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chinaʼs comprehensive administrative system for capital controls and ongoing capital liberalisation are unique features compared with other emerging economies. These allow us to investigate the effects of Chinaʼs capital controls and subsequent liberalisation policies, along with various global-push and domestic-pull factors, on its gross capital flows in a time series analysis. We collect various sources of information on Chinaʼs capital control policies from 2005 to 2022 and construct quarterly time series of Chinaʼs capital control indices for different types of gross flows. Using the bounds tests of cointegration and a conditional error-correction model, we show that Chinaʼs capital account liberalisation successfully encourages foreignersʼ investments aiming at production to maintain a long-term relationship with China, as well as their short-term financial investments to China. On the other hand, Chinese residents increase their long-term investments overseas during the liberalisation process. However, their portfolio investments abroad are not responsive to the relaxation of capital controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":45839,"journal":{"name":"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/app5.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app5.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chinaʼs comprehensive administrative system for capital controls and ongoing capital liberalisation are unique features compared with other emerging economies. These allow us to investigate the effects of Chinaʼs capital controls and subsequent liberalisation policies, along with various global-push and domestic-pull factors, on its gross capital flows in a time series analysis. We collect various sources of information on Chinaʼs capital control policies from 2005 to 2022 and construct quarterly time series of Chinaʼs capital control indices for different types of gross flows. Using the bounds tests of cointegration and a conditional error-correction model, we show that Chinaʼs capital account liberalisation successfully encourages foreignersʼ investments aiming at production to maintain a long-term relationship with China, as well as their short-term financial investments to China. On the other hand, Chinese residents increase their long-term investments overseas during the liberalisation process. However, their portfolio investments abroad are not responsive to the relaxation of capital controls.
期刊介绍:
Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies is the flagship journal of the Crawford School of Public Policy at The Australian National University. It is a peer-reviewed journal that targets research in policy studies in Australia, Asia and the Pacific, across a discipline focus that includes economics, political science, governance, development and the environment. Specific themes of recent interest include health and education, aid, migration, inequality, poverty reduction, energy, climate and the environment, food policy, public administration, the role of the private sector in public policy, trade, foreign policy, natural resource management and development policy. Papers on a range of topics that speak to various disciplines, the region and policy makers are encouraged. The goal of the journal is to break down barriers across disciplines, and generate policy impact. Submissions will be reviewed on the basis of content, policy relevance and readability.