Investigating technological processing supporting the assessment of novel proteins in food and feed risk assessment

Juan Manuel Martinez, María Gutiérrez, Beatriz Moreno, Miguel Calvo, Manuel Fondevila, Alejandro Belanche, Javier Raso, Javier Moreno, Ignacio Álvarez, Guillermo Cebrián
{"title":"Investigating technological processing supporting the assessment of novel proteins in food and feed risk assessment","authors":"Juan Manuel Martinez,&nbsp;María Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Beatriz Moreno,&nbsp;Miguel Calvo,&nbsp;Manuel Fondevila,&nbsp;Alejandro Belanche,&nbsp;Javier Raso,&nbsp;Javier Moreno,&nbsp;Ignacio Álvarez,&nbsp;Guillermo Cebrián","doi":"10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The safety of novel proteins is routinely evaluated in various regulated areas of the food and feed chain, including genetically modified (GM) crops and novel foods (NFs). This project aimed to map the food and feed products containing protein from the main GM crops, relevant food categories falling under the NF Regulation, and unconventional feed, together with their production processes and to discuss the effect of the mapped processes on the safety of the corresponding novel proteins. A scoping literature review (1,325 documents included), an open online survey and a stakeholder workshop were the basis to build up the mappings for products and processes, also including operational conditions for each processing step. In the case of crops, the information gathered also helped identify more than 40 products, and the corresponding production processes, not included in the OECD consensus documents for compositional considerations of GM crops. Moreover, a systematic literature review (154 documents included), carried out within the project, assisted in the identification of the available evidence on the impact of processing on protein safety. Overall, certain processes, such as thermal treatments, fermentation, or enzymatic hydrolysis, significantly enhanced protein digestibility across various food/feed matrices. Similarly, fermentation, ensiling, and extraction processes have been shown to improve nutritional properties in various products. The data collected seemed to indicate that heating can effectively reduce the activity of NEPs from GM crops and that heating and enzymatic hydrolysis can reduce IgE reactivity for certain proteins and operational conditions. However, exceptions to these trends were also reported in the literature, and in certain cases (e.g., impact on gut microbiota), the evidence gathered was insufficient to draw substantiated conclusions. This project also contributed to identify existing knowledge gaps and research needs towards regulatory risk assessment of food and feed products containing protein.</p>","PeriodicalId":100395,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Supporting Publications","volume":"21 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Supporting Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The safety of novel proteins is routinely evaluated in various regulated areas of the food and feed chain, including genetically modified (GM) crops and novel foods (NFs). This project aimed to map the food and feed products containing protein from the main GM crops, relevant food categories falling under the NF Regulation, and unconventional feed, together with their production processes and to discuss the effect of the mapped processes on the safety of the corresponding novel proteins. A scoping literature review (1,325 documents included), an open online survey and a stakeholder workshop were the basis to build up the mappings for products and processes, also including operational conditions for each processing step. In the case of crops, the information gathered also helped identify more than 40 products, and the corresponding production processes, not included in the OECD consensus documents for compositional considerations of GM crops. Moreover, a systematic literature review (154 documents included), carried out within the project, assisted in the identification of the available evidence on the impact of processing on protein safety. Overall, certain processes, such as thermal treatments, fermentation, or enzymatic hydrolysis, significantly enhanced protein digestibility across various food/feed matrices. Similarly, fermentation, ensiling, and extraction processes have been shown to improve nutritional properties in various products. The data collected seemed to indicate that heating can effectively reduce the activity of NEPs from GM crops and that heating and enzymatic hydrolysis can reduce IgE reactivity for certain proteins and operational conditions. However, exceptions to these trends were also reported in the literature, and in certain cases (e.g., impact on gut microbiota), the evidence gathered was insufficient to draw substantiated conclusions. This project also contributed to identify existing knowledge gaps and research needs towards regulatory risk assessment of food and feed products containing protein.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究支持食品和饲料风险评估中新型蛋白质评估的技术处理方法
在食品和饲料链的各个监管领域,包括转基因(GM)作物和新型食品(NFs),都会对新型蛋白质的安全性进行例行评估。本项目旨在绘制含有主要转基因作物蛋白质的食品和饲料产品、NF 法规下的相关食品类别和非常规饲料及其生产过程的地图,并讨论所绘制的过程对相应新型蛋白质安全性的影响。范围性文献审查(包括 1,325 份文件)、公开在线调查和利益相关者研讨会是建立产品和工艺映射的基础,还包括每个加工步骤的操作条件。就作物而言,收集到的信息还帮助确定了 40 多种产品和相应的生产工艺,这些产品和工艺未列入经合组织关于转基因作物成分考虑的共识文件。此外,在该项目范围内进行的系统文献审查(包括 154 份文件)有助于确定有关加工对蛋白质安全性影响的现有证据。总体而言,某些加工过程,如热处理、发酵或酶水解,可显著提高各种食品/饲料基质中蛋白质的消化率。同样,发酵、腌制和提取工艺也能改善各种产品的营养特性。收集到的数据似乎表明,加热可有效降低转基因作物中非转基因酶的活性,加热和酶水解可降低某些蛋白质和操作条件下的 IgE 反应性。不过,文献中也报告了这些趋势的例外情况,在某些情况下(如对肠道微生物群的影响),收集到的证据不足以得出确凿的结论。该项目还有助于确定现有的知识差距和研究需求,以便对含有蛋白质的食品和饲料产品进行监管风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel foods Risk Assessment Data Modelling and Extraction (NORA) — final report Administrative guidance for the preparation of notifications and applications on traditional foods from third countries in the context of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 Technical Report on the notification of roasted seeds of Dipteryx alata Vogel as a traditional food from a third country pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 Arrhenodes minutus Pest Report to support the ranking of EU candidate priority pests Polygraphus proximus Pest Report to support the ranking of EU candidate priority pests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1