Autistic adults display different verbal behavior only in mixed-neurotype interactions: Evidence from a referential communication task.

IF 5.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Autism Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1177/13623613241298376
Philippine Geelhand, Fanny Papastamou, Solène Jaspard, Mikhail Kissine
{"title":"Autistic adults display different verbal behavior only in mixed-neurotype interactions: Evidence from a referential communication task.","authors":"Philippine Geelhand, Fanny Papastamou, Solène Jaspard, Mikhail Kissine","doi":"10.1177/13623613241298376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Lay abstract: </strong>Recent research shows that in conversations, both participants influence the outcome. More specifically, conversations do not go as smoothly when autistic and non-autistic people talk together compared to when people of the same neurotype (either all autistic or all non-autistic) talk to each other. In studies finding a \"same-neurotype communicative advantage\", interaction partners knew about each other's neurotype. Because of this methodological choice, it is unclear whether mixed-neurotype interactions go less smoothly because participants knew they were interacting with a different neurotype or because each neurotype really has a distinct communication style. In our study, 134 adults were grouped into same-sex pairs: 23 autistic, 23 non-autistic, and 21 mixed-neurotype pairs. The pairs did not know if the other person was autistic or not. They completed an online task where the \"Director\" instructs the \"Matcher\" to reorder abstract pictures. Pairs did this task in two ways: by typing in a live chat and by speaking into a microphone without video. The study looked at how long the task took and how much the Director talked/wrote. Results showed that non-autistic pairs were faster to complete the task than autistic pairs and mixed pairs, meaning pairs with at least one autistic person were slower in general to complete the task. Interestingly, in mixed pairs, only autistic Directors produced more words than non-autistic Directors, in both typing and speaking. These findings suggest that even without knowing about their partner's neurotype and seeing/hearing their partner, autistic adults communicate differently when they interact with a non-autistic person.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"13623613241298376"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241298376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lay abstract: Recent research shows that in conversations, both participants influence the outcome. More specifically, conversations do not go as smoothly when autistic and non-autistic people talk together compared to when people of the same neurotype (either all autistic or all non-autistic) talk to each other. In studies finding a "same-neurotype communicative advantage", interaction partners knew about each other's neurotype. Because of this methodological choice, it is unclear whether mixed-neurotype interactions go less smoothly because participants knew they were interacting with a different neurotype or because each neurotype really has a distinct communication style. In our study, 134 adults were grouped into same-sex pairs: 23 autistic, 23 non-autistic, and 21 mixed-neurotype pairs. The pairs did not know if the other person was autistic or not. They completed an online task where the "Director" instructs the "Matcher" to reorder abstract pictures. Pairs did this task in two ways: by typing in a live chat and by speaking into a microphone without video. The study looked at how long the task took and how much the Director talked/wrote. Results showed that non-autistic pairs were faster to complete the task than autistic pairs and mixed pairs, meaning pairs with at least one autistic person were slower in general to complete the task. Interestingly, in mixed pairs, only autistic Directors produced more words than non-autistic Directors, in both typing and speaking. These findings suggest that even without knowing about their partner's neurotype and seeing/hearing their partner, autistic adults communicate differently when they interact with a non-autistic person.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症成人仅在混合神经类型的互动中表现出不同的言语行为:来自参照交流任务的证据
内容提要:最新研究表明,在对话中,参与者双方都会影响对话结果。更具体地说,当自闭症患者和非自闭症患者一起交谈时,与相同神经类型(全部为自闭症患者或全部为非自闭症患者)的人相互交谈时相比,交谈不会那么顺利。在发现 "相同神经类型交流优势 "的研究中,互动伙伴知道彼此的神经类型。由于这种方法上的选择,目前还不清楚混合神经类型的互动之所以不太顺利,是因为参与者知道他们在与不同的神经类型进行互动,还是因为每种神经类型确实都有独特的交流风格。在我们的研究中,134 名成年人被分成同性配对:23 对自闭症配对、23 对非自闭症配对和 21 对混合神经类型配对。这些配对者并不知道对方是否患有自闭症。他们完成了一项在线任务,由 "指导者 "指示 "匹配者 "对抽象图片重新排序。配对者以两种方式完成这项任务:在即时聊天中打字,以及在没有视频的情况下对着麦克风说话。研究考察了任务所需的时间以及 "导演 "的说话/书写内容。结果显示,非自闭症配对者完成任务的速度比自闭症配对者和混合配对者快,也就是说,至少有一名自闭症患者的配对者完成任务的速度普遍较慢。有趣的是,在混合配对中,只有自闭症指导员在打字和说话时比非自闭症指导员说出更多的单词。这些研究结果表明,即使不知道其伴侣的神经类型,也看不到/听不到其伴侣的声音,自闭症成年人在与非自闭症患者互动时,交流方式也会有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Autism
Autism PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.50%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Autism is a major, peer-reviewed, international journal, published 8 times a year, publishing research of direct and practical relevance to help improve the quality of life for individuals with autism or autism-related disorders. It is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on research in many areas, including: intervention; diagnosis; training; education; translational issues related to neuroscience, medical and genetic issues of practical import; psychological processes; evaluation of particular therapies; quality of life; family needs; and epidemiological research. Autism provides a major international forum for peer-reviewed research of direct and practical relevance to improving the quality of life for individuals with autism or autism-related disorders. The journal''s success and popularity reflect the recent worldwide growth in the research and understanding of autistic spectrum disorders, and the consequent impact on the provision of treatment and care. Autism is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on evaluative research in all areas, including: intervention, diagnosis, training, education, neuroscience, psychological processes, evaluation of particular therapies, quality of life issues, family issues and family services, medical and genetic issues, epidemiological research.
期刊最新文献
Sex-typical toy, activity, and playmate preferences in autistic and non-autistic children. From humble beginnings: Reflections on 10 years of the Participatory Autism Research Collective. Exploring lie frequency and emotional experiences of deceptive decision-making in autistic adults. Satisfaction with friendship support protects autistic youth from the negative effects of peer victimization. Food selectivity and eating difficulties in adults with autism and/or ADHD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1