The association between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors /angiotensin receptor blockers and the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1186/s12890-024-03386-y
Hongfeng Cai, Hongtao Shen, Xiaohua Cao
{"title":"The association between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors /angiotensin receptor blockers and the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Hongfeng Cai, Hongtao Shen, Xiaohua Cao","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03386-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was to examine the association between treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) among patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a retrospective cohort approach, the data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. VAP diagnoses were ascertained through the international classification of disease codes recorded in the database. Both univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between ACEI or ARB use and VAP. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of comorbidities (AKI, renal failure, diabetes, hypertension, and sepsis), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), as well as the use of vasopressors and antibiotics on this association. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the evaluation metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 8,888 patients, with 897 (10.09%) experiencing VAP. The analysis revealed that patients on ACEI or ARB therapy had a lower risk of developing VAP (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99, P = 0.047). Subgroup analyses revealed that the protective effect was observed in patients with AKI (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52-0.94, P = 0.020), renal failure (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.02-0.84, P = 0.032), and diabetes (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.94, P = 0.024), as well as in those receiving vasopressors (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.92, P = 0.012), and antibiotics (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.96, P = 0.021). No significant difference in VAP development was observed between patients treated with ACEI versus ARB (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.49-1.47, P = 0.547).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study's findings suggest a substantial association between the use of ACEIs or ARBs and reduced development of VAP, particularly among patients with specific comorbidities and those on vasopressor and antibiotic therapy. This study may educate the ICU team on the potential benefits of ACEIs and ARBs in preventing VAP, emphasizing the importance of considering these medications in the overall treatment plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03386-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was to examine the association between treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the risk of developing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) among patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: Utilizing a retrospective cohort approach, the data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. VAP diagnoses were ascertained through the international classification of disease codes recorded in the database. Both univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between ACEI or ARB use and VAP. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of comorbidities (AKI, renal failure, diabetes, hypertension, and sepsis), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), as well as the use of vasopressors and antibiotics on this association. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the evaluation metrics.

Results: The study comprised 8,888 patients, with 897 (10.09%) experiencing VAP. The analysis revealed that patients on ACEI or ARB therapy had a lower risk of developing VAP (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99, P = 0.047). Subgroup analyses revealed that the protective effect was observed in patients with AKI (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52-0.94, P = 0.020), renal failure (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.02-0.84, P = 0.032), and diabetes (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.94, P = 0.024), as well as in those receiving vasopressors (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.92, P = 0.012), and antibiotics (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57-0.96, P = 0.021). No significant difference in VAP development was observed between patients treated with ACEI versus ARB (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.49-1.47, P = 0.547).

Conclusion: This study's findings suggest a substantial association between the use of ACEIs or ARBs and reduced development of VAP, particularly among patients with specific comorbidities and those on vasopressor and antibiotic therapy. This study may educate the ICU team on the potential benefits of ACEIs and ARBs in preventing VAP, emphasizing the importance of considering these medications in the overall treatment plan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护病房使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与发生呼吸机相关肺炎之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
研究背景本研究旨在探讨血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)的治疗与重症监护病房(ICU)中接受机械通气(MV)的患者罹患呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的风险之间的关系:方法:采用回顾性队列方法,从重症监护室医学信息市场(Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV)数据库中提取数据。通过数据库中记录的国际疾病分类代码确定 VAP 诊断。我们进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估使用 ACEI 或 ARB 与 VAP 之间的关系。还进行了分组分析,以评估合并症(AKI、肾衰竭、糖尿病、高血压和败血症)、简化急性生理学评分 II(SAPS II)以及血管加压药和抗生素的使用对这种关联的影响。研究采用了带95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(ORs)作为评价指标:该研究包括 8888 名患者,其中 897 人(10.09%)出现 VAP。分析显示,接受 ACEI 或 ARB 治疗的患者发生 VAP 的风险较低(OR:0.79,95% CI:0.62-0.99,P = 0.047)。亚组分析显示,在下列患者中观察到保护作用:AKI(OR:0.70,95% CI:0.52-0.94,P = 0.020)、肾功能衰竭(OR:0.14,95% CI:0.02-0.84,P = 0.032)、糖尿病(OR:0.64,95% CI:0.43-0.94,P = 0.024)以及接受血管加压剂(OR:0.67,95% CI:0.49-0.92,P = 0.012)和抗生素(OR:0.74,95% CI:0.57-0.96,P = 0.021)的患者。接受 ACEI 与 ARB 治疗的患者在 VAP 发生率上无明显差异(OR:0.84,95% CI:0.49-1.47,P = 0.547):本研究结果表明,使用 ACEIs 或 ARBs 与减少 VAP 的发生有很大关系,尤其是在有特殊合并症的患者和接受血管加压药和抗生素治疗的患者中。这项研究可以让重症监护室团队了解 ACEIs 和 ARBs 在预防 VAP 方面的潜在益处,强调在整体治疗计划中考虑这些药物的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Proposal of a radiation-free screening protocol for early detection of interstitial lung involvement in seropositive and ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in critically ill and surgical adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Predictive value of direct bilirubin and total bile acid in lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKIs. Ectopic thyroid carcinoma in central airway with normally located goiterous thyroid gland: A case report. Candidate gene polymorphisms associated with silicosis and coal workers' pneumoconiosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1