Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth.

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Avery D Faigenbaum, Jie Kang, Jenna Ingui, Aidan Fish, Jessica Dimatteo, Izzy Leazier, Jill A Bush, Nicholas A Ratamess
{"title":"Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth.","authors":"Avery D Faigenbaum, Jie Kang, Jenna Ingui, Aidan Fish, Jessica Dimatteo, Izzy Leazier, Jill A Bush, Nicholas A Ratamess","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the warm-up effects of a treadmill walking warm-up (TW) with a dynamic warm-up (DW) on the responses to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in youth. A sample of 16 active youth (age 13.6 ± 1.8 yr) were tested for peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub> peak) using the Fitkids treadmill test protocol on 2 nonconsecutive days following different 6-min warm-up procedures. The TW consisted of walking on a treadmill at 2.2 mph and 0% grade whereas the DW consisted of 12 bodyweight exercises with a 2 kg medicine ball. Maximal heart rate (HR) was significantly higher following DW vs TW (200.8 ± 6.16 vs. 197.9 ± 7.3 bpm, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found between DW and TW for VO<sub>2</sub> peak (50.5 ± 9.9 vs 50.6 ± 11.1 ml/kg/min), maximal minute ventilation (V<sub>E</sub>; 93.0 ±21.4 vs. 92.7 ±21.2 L/min), maximal respiratory exchange ratio (1.19 ± 0.08 vs 1.22 ± 0.08), and total exercise test time (668.1 ± 103.5 vs 686.3 ± 97.0 s), respectively. During the Fitkids treadmill test protocol HR and V<sub>E</sub> were significantly higher following DW vs TW at stage 1, stage 2, stage 3 and stage 4, and oxygen uptake was significantly higher following DW vs TW during stage 1 (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Findings indicate a DW elicits a higher maximal HR and higher submaximal HR, V<sub>E</sub>, and oxygen uptake values than TW during CPET in youth, although no differences in VO<sub>2</sub> peak were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 4","pages":"1530-1539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the warm-up effects of a treadmill walking warm-up (TW) with a dynamic warm-up (DW) on the responses to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in youth. A sample of 16 active youth (age 13.6 ± 1.8 yr) were tested for peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) using the Fitkids treadmill test protocol on 2 nonconsecutive days following different 6-min warm-up procedures. The TW consisted of walking on a treadmill at 2.2 mph and 0% grade whereas the DW consisted of 12 bodyweight exercises with a 2 kg medicine ball. Maximal heart rate (HR) was significantly higher following DW vs TW (200.8 ± 6.16 vs. 197.9 ± 7.3 bpm, respectively; p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were found between DW and TW for VO2 peak (50.5 ± 9.9 vs 50.6 ± 11.1 ml/kg/min), maximal minute ventilation (VE; 93.0 ±21.4 vs. 92.7 ±21.2 L/min), maximal respiratory exchange ratio (1.19 ± 0.08 vs 1.22 ± 0.08), and total exercise test time (668.1 ± 103.5 vs 686.3 ± 97.0 s), respectively. During the Fitkids treadmill test protocol HR and VE were significantly higher following DW vs TW at stage 1, stage 2, stage 3 and stage 4, and oxygen uptake was significantly higher following DW vs TW during stage 1 (all p < 0.05). Findings indicate a DW elicits a higher maximal HR and higher submaximal HR, VE, and oxygen uptake values than TW during CPET in youth, although no differences in VO2 peak were observed.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同热身方案对青少年运动测试心肺反应的影响
本研究旨在比较跑步机步行热身(TW)和动态热身(DW)对青少年心肺运动测试(CPET)反应的热身效果。16 名活泼好动的青少年(年龄为 13.6 ± 1.8 岁)在不同的 6 分钟热身程序后,在两个不连续的日子里接受了 Fitkids 跑步机测试方案的峰值摄氧量(VO2 峰值)测试。TW包括在跑步机上以2.2英里/小时的速度和0%的坡度行走,而DW包括用2公斤的药球进行12次负重练习。DW 与 TW 相比,最大心率(HR)明显更高(分别为 200.8 ± 6.16 与 197.9 ± 7.3 bpm;P < 0.05),而在 VO2 峰值(50.5 ± 9.9 与 50.6 ± 11.1 ml/kg/min)、最大分钟通气量(VE;93.0 ±21.4 vs. 92.7 ±21.2 L/min)、最大呼吸交换比(1.19 ± 0.08 vs. 1.22 ± 0.08)和运动测试总时间(668.1 ± 103.5 vs. 686.3 ± 97.0 s)分别在 DW 和 TW 之间无明显差异。在 Fitkids 跑步机测试方案中,在第一阶段、第二阶段、第三阶段和第四阶段,DW 与 TW 相比,心率和 VE 明显更高;在第一阶段,DW 与 TW 相比,摄氧量明显更高(所有数据均小于 0.05)。研究结果表明,在 CPET 中,DW 比 TW 能激发更高的最大心率和更高的次最大心率、VE 和摄氧量,但在 VO2 峰值上没有观察到差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Mental Fatigue Induced by the Stroop Test on Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Activation in Division III Female Athletes. Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of a Commercially Available Velocity Measuring Device When Performing Selected Exercises. Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth. Relative Age Effect for Different Playing Positions in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players. A Comparison of Achilles Tendon Morphological Characteristics Based Upon VISA-A Score in Active Adults Over Age 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1