Managing medicines in decentralisation: discrepancies between national policies and local practices in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health policy and planning Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/heapol/czae114
Relmbuss Biljers Fanda, Ari Probandari, Maarten Olivier Kok, Roland A Bal
{"title":"Managing medicines in decentralisation: discrepancies between national policies and local practices in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia.","authors":"Relmbuss Biljers Fanda, Ari Probandari, Maarten Olivier Kok, Roland A Bal","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czae114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Indonesia, primary health centres (PHCs) are mandated to provide essential medicines to ensure equal access to medication for all Indonesians, as stated in the national medicine policy. However, limited information is available regarding the actual practices of health workers within the context of decentralised governance. This paper investigates the discrepancies between national policies and local practices in two Indonesian districts, shedding light on coping mechanisms employed in each phase of medicine management within PHCs. The mixed-method study began by identifying pertinent policies addressing medicine management in PHCs. Subsequently, panel data on patient visits to tuberculosis, maternal and neonatal health (MNH) and non-communicable disease (NCD) services were collected from 2019 to 2022. After analysing the panel data, interviews were conducted with 56 health workers including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, midwives, and public health programme managers regarding their views on fluctuations in medicine stocks and the patient visits data. These participants included pharmacists and programme managers specialising in tuberculosis, MNH, and NCD care and were affiliated with PHCs and district health offices (DHO). Our findings highlight the occasional unavailability of essential medicines in PHCs, with stockouts being attributed to supplier shortages at provincial and national levels and to variations in the capacity of the local health system. Low-skilled pharmaceutical staff are a contributing factor in each phase of medicine management. Additionally, health workers employ coping mechanisms, such as deviating from policy on the use of capitation funds to purchase medicines, to manage temporary stockouts. To tackle systemic stockouts, central government should prioritise capacity-building among health workers, by establishing a continuous and easily accessible local learning system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Indonesia, primary health centres (PHCs) are mandated to provide essential medicines to ensure equal access to medication for all Indonesians, as stated in the national medicine policy. However, limited information is available regarding the actual practices of health workers within the context of decentralised governance. This paper investigates the discrepancies between national policies and local practices in two Indonesian districts, shedding light on coping mechanisms employed in each phase of medicine management within PHCs. The mixed-method study began by identifying pertinent policies addressing medicine management in PHCs. Subsequently, panel data on patient visits to tuberculosis, maternal and neonatal health (MNH) and non-communicable disease (NCD) services were collected from 2019 to 2022. After analysing the panel data, interviews were conducted with 56 health workers including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, midwives, and public health programme managers regarding their views on fluctuations in medicine stocks and the patient visits data. These participants included pharmacists and programme managers specialising in tuberculosis, MNH, and NCD care and were affiliated with PHCs and district health offices (DHO). Our findings highlight the occasional unavailability of essential medicines in PHCs, with stockouts being attributed to supplier shortages at provincial and national levels and to variations in the capacity of the local health system. Low-skilled pharmaceutical staff are a contributing factor in each phase of medicine management. Additionally, health workers employ coping mechanisms, such as deviating from policy on the use of capitation funds to purchase medicines, to manage temporary stockouts. To tackle systemic stockouts, central government should prioritise capacity-building among health workers, by establishing a continuous and easily accessible local learning system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力下放中的药品管理:印度尼西亚基层医疗机构中国家政策与地方实践之间的差异。
在印度尼西亚,国家医药政策规定,初级保健中心(PHC)必须提供基本药物,以确保所有印度尼西亚人都能平等地获得药物。然而,有关卫生工作者在分权管理背景下的实际做法的信息却十分有限。本文调查了印尼两个地区的国家政策与当地实践之间的差异,揭示了初级保健中心内药品管理各阶段所采用的应对机制。这项混合方法研究首先确定了针对初级保健中心药品管理的相关政策。随后,收集了 2019 年至 2022 年期间结核病、孕产妇和新生儿健康(MNH)以及非传染性疾病(NCD)服务的患者就诊面板数据。在对面板数据进行分析后,对包括医生、护士、药剂师、助产士和公共卫生项目管理人员在内的 56 名卫生工作者进行了访谈,了解他们对药品库存波动和患者就诊数据的看法。这些参与者包括专门从事结核病、MNH 和非传染性疾病护理的药剂师和项目经理,他们隶属于初级保健中心和地区卫生局 (DHO)。我们的调查结果表明,初级保健中心偶尔会出现基本药物供应不足的情况,造成缺货的原因包括省级和国家级供应商短缺以及当地卫生系统能力的差异。在药品管理的各个阶段,药剂人员技术水平低都是造成缺药的一个因素。此外,卫生工作者还采用了一些应对机制,如偏离使用按人头付费资金购买药品的政策,以管理临时性缺货。为解决系统性缺货问题,中央政府应通过建立一个持续且易于使用的地方学习系统,优先加强卫生工作者的能力建设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualising maternal mental health in rural Ghana: A realist qualitative analysis. Learning Analysis of Health System Resilience. Managing medicines in decentralisation: discrepancies between national policies and local practices in primary healthcare settings in Indonesia. What is the relationship between hospital management practices and quality of care? A systematic review of the global evidence. Development partner influence on domestic health financing contributions in Senegal: a mixed methods case study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1