ABO-identical versus incompatible platelet transfusion in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312602
Lauren K Dunn, Emily Venner, Matthew Nguyen, Jose Perdomo Trejo, Zachary Holley, Bhiken I Naik, Jenna Khan, Michael Mazzeffi
{"title":"ABO-identical versus incompatible platelet transfusion in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.","authors":"Lauren K Dunn, Emily Venner, Matthew Nguyen, Jose Perdomo Trejo, Zachary Holley, Bhiken I Naik, Jenna Khan, Michael Mazzeffi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0312602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with spontaneous and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are frequently transfused platelets to treat thrombocytopenia, platelet function defects, and reverse antiplatelet drugs. ABO-identical platelet transfusion has been suggested to lead to higher post-transfusion platelet increments compared to major-ABO incompatible transfusion. We hypothesized that patients who received ABO-identical transfusion would have higher post-transfusion platelet increments and superior neurologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with traumatic or non-traumatic ICH from January 1st 2018 to December 31st 2022 were identified using electronic medical records and international classification of disease (ICD)-10 codes. Patients were excluded if they lacked a platelet count within 24 hours before and within 24 hours after transfusion or if they received multiple platelet transfusions before their platelet count was remeasured. After stratification by ABO-identical, ABO-major incompatible, and ABO-minor incompatible transfusion, post transfusion increments were compared, as were clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 167 patients who received platelet transfusion, 76 (45.5%) received ABO-identical transfusion, 54 (32.3%) received ABO-major incompatible transfusion, and 37 (22.2%) received ABO-minor incompatible transfusion. There were no significant differences in absolute platelet increment between groups. The median increment was 7x109/L for ABO-identical platelets, 10x109/L for ABO-major incompatible platelets, and 11x109/L for ABO-minor incompatible platelets, p = .87. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients discharged alive with modified Rankin score of 1 or 2 or cerebral performance category 1 or 2 between groups (p = .56 and .39 respectively). After adjusting for confounders in a general linear model there remained no associations between ABO compatibility and platelet increment after transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data support similar efficacy for ABO-identical and ABO-incompatible platelet transfusion in patients with ICH.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0312602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with spontaneous and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are frequently transfused platelets to treat thrombocytopenia, platelet function defects, and reverse antiplatelet drugs. ABO-identical platelet transfusion has been suggested to lead to higher post-transfusion platelet increments compared to major-ABO incompatible transfusion. We hypothesized that patients who received ABO-identical transfusion would have higher post-transfusion platelet increments and superior neurologic outcomes.

Methods: Adults with traumatic or non-traumatic ICH from January 1st 2018 to December 31st 2022 were identified using electronic medical records and international classification of disease (ICD)-10 codes. Patients were excluded if they lacked a platelet count within 24 hours before and within 24 hours after transfusion or if they received multiple platelet transfusions before their platelet count was remeasured. After stratification by ABO-identical, ABO-major incompatible, and ABO-minor incompatible transfusion, post transfusion increments were compared, as were clinical outcomes.

Results: Among 167 patients who received platelet transfusion, 76 (45.5%) received ABO-identical transfusion, 54 (32.3%) received ABO-major incompatible transfusion, and 37 (22.2%) received ABO-minor incompatible transfusion. There were no significant differences in absolute platelet increment between groups. The median increment was 7x109/L for ABO-identical platelets, 10x109/L for ABO-major incompatible platelets, and 11x109/L for ABO-minor incompatible platelets, p = .87. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients discharged alive with modified Rankin score of 1 or 2 or cerebral performance category 1 or 2 between groups (p = .56 and .39 respectively). After adjusting for confounders in a general linear model there remained no associations between ABO compatibility and platelet increment after transfusion.

Conclusions: Our data support similar efficacy for ABO-identical and ABO-incompatible platelet transfusion in patients with ICH.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅内出血患者输注 ABO 相同血小板与不相容血小板的比较。
背景:自发性和外伤性颅内出血(ICH)患者经常需要输注血小板来治疗血小板减少症、血小板功能缺陷和逆转抗血小板药物。有研究表明,与主要 ABO 血型不相容的输血相比,ABO 相同的血小板输注会导致更高的输血后血小板增量。我们假设,接受 ABO 相同输血的患者输血后血小板增量会更高,神经系统预后会更好:使用电子病历和国际疾病分类(ICD)-10 代码识别 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间患有创伤性或非创伤性 ICH 的成人。如果患者在输血前 24 小时内和输血后 24 小时内未进行血小板计数,或在重新测量血小板计数前接受过多次血小板输注,则将其排除在外。按ABO血型相同、ABO血型主要不相容和ABO血型次要不相容进行分层后,比较了输血后的增量和临床结果:在 167 名接受血小板输注的患者中,76 人(45.5%)接受了 ABO 血型相同的输注,54 人(32.3%)接受了 ABO 大体不相容的输注,37 人(22.2%)接受了 ABO 小体不相容的输注。各组间血小板绝对增量无明显差异。ABO血型相同的血小板增量中位数为7x109/L,ABO血型大体不相容的血小板增量中位数为10x109/L,ABO血型小体不相容的血小板增量中位数为11x109/L,P = .87。改良 Rankin 评分为 1 分或 2 分或脑功能为 1 级或 2 级的患者出院时存活的比例在各组间无明显差异(p = .56 和 .39)。在一般线性模型中对混杂因素进行调整后,ABO相容性与输血后血小板增量之间仍然没有关联:我们的数据支持对 ICH 患者输注 ABO 相同和 ABO 不相容血小板具有相似的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Lived experiences of female second-cycle students with abnormal menstrual cycle in a selected municipality of Ghana: A phenomenological qualitative study. SCEAF-UNet: Medical image segmentation based on spatial-channel feature enhancement and adaptive fusion. Using machine learning to predict the small for gestational age and identify the important predictors: A real-world clinical cohort study in China. Does love in the ivory tower fix the leaky pipeline? How academia's homogamous relationships shape careers. Assessment of weight bias among students and health professionals in medical radiation science. A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1