Screening and treatment practices for iron deficiency in anaemic pregnant women: A cross-sectional survey of healthcare workers in Nigeria.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0310912
Ochuwa Adiketu Babah, Lenka Beňová, Claudia Hanson, Ajibola Ibraheem Abioye, Elin C Larsson, Bosede Bukola Afolabi
{"title":"Screening and treatment practices for iron deficiency in anaemic pregnant women: A cross-sectional survey of healthcare workers in Nigeria.","authors":"Ochuwa Adiketu Babah, Lenka Beňová, Claudia Hanson, Ajibola Ibraheem Abioye, Elin C Larsson, Bosede Bukola Afolabi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0310912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy is a significant contributor to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality globally. Despite international and national guidelines for its screening and treatment, knowledge and prescription practices of healthcare providers vary.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine maternal healthcare workers' screening and treatment practices for iron deficiency in anaemic pregnancy women in two states in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This cross-sectional study sampled maternal healthcare workers from 84 randomly selected public health facilities in Lagos and Kano States. Data on methods of diagnosis and prescription practices for iron deficiency anaemia were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Means and percentages were reported using probability weights, and a comparison of practices of anaemia treatment between doctors and nurses/midwives was done using Chi-square test or Fishers exact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 467 maternal healthcare workers surveyed (232 from Lagos, 235 from Kano), 40.0% were doctors, 54.0% nurses or midwives and 6.0% community health extension workers. In the sample, 27.6% always and 58.7% sometimes screened anaemic pregnant women for iron deficiency; among these, 84.7% screened using complete blood count. Oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia was prescribed by 96.9%. Intravenous iron for treatment was prescribed by 30.2%, but by only by 18.6% as first-line drug (as iron dextran by 69.3% and as iron sucrose by 31.5% of intravenous iron prescribers). Commonest reasons for low usage of intravenous iron were cost and need for venepuncture. Fifty-three percent of maternal healthcare workers' prescribed iron supplements for anaemia during concomitant infection, with the prescription practice similar among doctors versus nurse/midwives (p = 0.074).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found suboptimal levels of screening for iron deficiency among anaemic pregnant women. Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy is almost exclusively treated with oral iron by maternal healthcare workers in the two Nigerian states, similarly between doctors and nurses/midwives. Further research into potential reasons for low screening for iron deficiency and low use of intravenous iron are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0310912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy is a significant contributor to maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality globally. Despite international and national guidelines for its screening and treatment, knowledge and prescription practices of healthcare providers vary.

Aim: To determine maternal healthcare workers' screening and treatment practices for iron deficiency in anaemic pregnancy women in two states in Nigeria.

Methodology: This cross-sectional study sampled maternal healthcare workers from 84 randomly selected public health facilities in Lagos and Kano States. Data on methods of diagnosis and prescription practices for iron deficiency anaemia were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Means and percentages were reported using probability weights, and a comparison of practices of anaemia treatment between doctors and nurses/midwives was done using Chi-square test or Fishers exact.

Results: Of the 467 maternal healthcare workers surveyed (232 from Lagos, 235 from Kano), 40.0% were doctors, 54.0% nurses or midwives and 6.0% community health extension workers. In the sample, 27.6% always and 58.7% sometimes screened anaemic pregnant women for iron deficiency; among these, 84.7% screened using complete blood count. Oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia was prescribed by 96.9%. Intravenous iron for treatment was prescribed by 30.2%, but by only by 18.6% as first-line drug (as iron dextran by 69.3% and as iron sucrose by 31.5% of intravenous iron prescribers). Commonest reasons for low usage of intravenous iron were cost and need for venepuncture. Fifty-three percent of maternal healthcare workers' prescribed iron supplements for anaemia during concomitant infection, with the prescription practice similar among doctors versus nurse/midwives (p = 0.074).

Conclusion: We found suboptimal levels of screening for iron deficiency among anaemic pregnant women. Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy is almost exclusively treated with oral iron by maternal healthcare workers in the two Nigerian states, similarly between doctors and nurses/midwives. Further research into potential reasons for low screening for iron deficiency and low use of intravenous iron are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贫血孕妇缺铁的筛查和治疗方法:尼日利亚医护人员横断面调查。
背景:妊娠期缺铁性贫血是导致全球孕产妇和围产期发病率和死亡率的一个重要因素。目的:了解尼日利亚两个州的孕产妇医护人员对贫血孕妇缺铁的筛查和治疗方法:这项横断面研究从拉各斯州和卡诺州随机抽取的 84 家公共医疗机构的孕产妇医护人员中进行抽样调查。使用自填式问卷收集了有关缺铁性贫血的诊断方法和处方做法的数据。平均数和百分比采用概率加权法进行报告,医生和护士/助产士之间的贫血治疗方法比较采用卡方检验(Chi-square test)或菲舍尔精确检验(Fishers exact):在接受调查的 467 名孕产妇医护人员中(232 名来自拉各斯,235 名来自卡诺),40.0% 是医生,54.0% 是护士或助产士,6.0% 是社区卫生推广人员。在抽样调查中,27.6% 的人总是和 58.7% 的人有时会对贫血孕妇进行缺铁筛查;其中 84.7% 的人使用全血细胞计数进行筛查。96.9%的人处方口服铁剂治疗缺铁性贫血。有 30.2% 的处方使用静脉注射铁剂治疗,但只有 18.6% 的处方将其作为一线药物(69.3% 的静脉注射铁剂处方使用右旋糖酐铁剂,31.5% 的处方使用蔗糖铁剂)。静脉注射铁剂使用率低的最常见原因是成本和需要静脉穿刺。53%的孕产妇医护人员为合并感染期间的贫血患者开具铁剂处方,医生与护士/助产士的处方做法相似(p = 0.074):结论:我们发现贫血孕妇的缺铁筛查水平不理想。尼日利亚两个州的孕产妇医护人员几乎只用口服铁剂治疗妊娠期缺铁性贫血,医生和护士/助产士的情况类似。需要进一步研究缺铁筛查率低和静脉注射铁剂使用率低的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Comparing the impact of contextual associations and statistical regularities in visual search and attention orienting. Shared decision making applied to self-management program for hypertensive patients: A scoping review protocol. Identification of gully erosion activity and its influencing factors: A case study of the Sunshui River Basin. Complex regional pain syndrome after distal radius fracture: A survey of current practices. Compound 4f, a novel brain-penetrant reversible monoacylglycerol inhibitor, ameliorates neuroinflammation, neuronal cell loss, and cognitive impairment in mice with kainic acid-induced neurodegeneration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1