Usefulness of participation of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system-qualified surgeons in laparoscopic high anterior resection

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1111/ases.13409
Naruhiko Sawada, Shumpei Mukai, Tomonori Akagi, Ken Okamoto, Fumihiko Fujita, Hirokazu Suwa, Yoshihito Ide, Tomohisa Furuhata, Akiyoshi Kanazawa, Tsukasa Shimamura, Shigehiro Kojima, Shinobu Ohnuma, Tatsuya Kinjo, Nobuki Ichikawa, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Akinobu Taketomi, Takeshi Naitoh, EnSSURE Study Group Collaboratives in the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
{"title":"Usefulness of participation of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system-qualified surgeons in laparoscopic high anterior resection","authors":"Naruhiko Sawada,&nbsp;Shumpei Mukai,&nbsp;Tomonori Akagi,&nbsp;Ken Okamoto,&nbsp;Fumihiko Fujita,&nbsp;Hirokazu Suwa,&nbsp;Yoshihito Ide,&nbsp;Tomohisa Furuhata,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Kanazawa,&nbsp;Tsukasa Shimamura,&nbsp;Shigehiro Kojima,&nbsp;Shinobu Ohnuma,&nbsp;Tatsuya Kinjo,&nbsp;Nobuki Ichikawa,&nbsp;Shigeki Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Akinobu Taketomi,&nbsp;Takeshi Naitoh,&nbsp;EnSSURE Study Group Collaboratives in the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery","doi":"10.1111/ases.13409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>A technical qualification system was established by the Japanese Society of Endoscopic Surgery in 2004, and its effectiveness in low anterior resection (LAR) has been reported. We herein performed a subgroup analysis of the effectiveness of the participation of technically qualified surgeons in laparoscopy-assisted high anterior resection (HAR), a procedure used for the technical qualification of surgeons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The EnSSURE study enrolled 3188 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer between January 2014 and December 2016 at 56 Japanese hospitals. The outcomes of HAR were compared between groups with and without the participation of technically qualified surgeons. The background of the two groups were equalized by propensity score matching.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the group with the participation of qualified surgeons, the operative time was significantly shorter (<i>p</i> = .0427), more lymph nodes were dissected (<i>p</i> = .0207), and the conversion rate to open surgery was lower (<i>p</i> = .0016); however, no significant difference was observed in blood loss (<i>p</i> = .0616), the R0 resection rate (<i>p</i> = 1.00), intraoperative complication rate (<i>p</i> = .160), postoperative complication rate (<i>p</i> = 1.00), or reoperation rate (<i>p</i> = .6999) between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant difference was noted in long-term outcomes (recurrence-free survival (<i>p</i> = .275) or overall survival (<i>p</i> = .941)).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In HAR, the technical benefits of the participation of qualified surgeons was limited to a shorter operative time and lower conversion rate. Nevertheless, the qualification is unique in that it predicts the usefulness of reducing complications in more technically challenging procedures when its effectiveness in LAR is considered.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.13409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

A technical qualification system was established by the Japanese Society of Endoscopic Surgery in 2004, and its effectiveness in low anterior resection (LAR) has been reported. We herein performed a subgroup analysis of the effectiveness of the participation of technically qualified surgeons in laparoscopy-assisted high anterior resection (HAR), a procedure used for the technical qualification of surgeons.

Methods

The EnSSURE study enrolled 3188 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer between January 2014 and December 2016 at 56 Japanese hospitals. The outcomes of HAR were compared between groups with and without the participation of technically qualified surgeons. The background of the two groups were equalized by propensity score matching.

Results

In the group with the participation of qualified surgeons, the operative time was significantly shorter (p = .0427), more lymph nodes were dissected (p = .0207), and the conversion rate to open surgery was lower (p = .0016); however, no significant difference was observed in blood loss (p = .0616), the R0 resection rate (p = 1.00), intraoperative complication rate (p = .160), postoperative complication rate (p = 1.00), or reoperation rate (p = .6999) between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant difference was noted in long-term outcomes (recurrence-free survival (p = .275) or overall survival (p = .941)).

Conclusions

In HAR, the technical benefits of the participation of qualified surgeons was limited to a shorter operative time and lower conversion rate. Nevertheless, the qualification is unique in that it predicts the usefulness of reducing complications in more technically challenging procedures when its effectiveness in LAR is considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过内窥镜手术技能资格认证系统认证的外科医生参与腹腔镜高位前路切除术的实用性。
简介日本内镜外科协会于2004年建立了一个技术资格认证系统,其在低位前路切除术(LAR)中的有效性已有报道。我们在此对技术合格的外科医生参与腹腔镜辅助高位前路切除术(HAR)的有效性进行了亚组分析,该程序用于对外科医生进行技术资格认证:EnSSURE研究招募了2014年1月至2016年12月期间在日本56家医院接受腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的3188名患者。比较了有技术合格的外科医生参与和无技术合格的外科医生参与两组患者的 HAR 结果。两组的背景通过倾向得分匹配进行了均衡:结果:在有合格外科医生参与的组别中,手术时间明显更短(p = .0427),切除的淋巴结更多(p = .0207),转为开放手术的比例更低(p = .0016);但两组患者在失血量(p = .0616)、R0切除率(p = 1.00)、术中并发症发生率(p = .160)、术后并发症发生率(p = 1.00)或再次手术率(p = .6999)方面均无明显差异。此外,长期结果(无复发生存率(p = .275)或总生存率(p = .941))也无明显差异:在哈医大一院,合格外科医生参与的技术优势仅限于缩短手术时间和降低转院率。尽管如此,资格认证的独特之处在于,当考虑到其在 LAR 中的有效性时,它可以预测在更具技术挑战性的手术中减少并发症的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection After Chemotherapy for Nonseminomatous Testicular Germ-Cell Tumor at a Single Center. Perioperative Outcomes and Feasibility of Single-Stage Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) and Cholecystectomy With Internal Endo-Biliary Drainage for Management of Concomitant Cholelithiasis With Choledocholithiasis: A Report From a Tertiary Care Hospital. The financial impact of robotic surgery on hospital gross profits in Japan compared to laparoscopic surgery Close Contact Transillumination Light Guides Surgeon to Vaginal Point Aa: Pharus Method for Robot-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy Usefulness of participation of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system-qualified surgeons in laparoscopic high anterior resection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1