Assessment of whole-site methane emissions from anaerobic digestion plants: Towards establishing emission factors for various plant configurations.

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Waste management Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2024.11.021
Viktoria Wechselberger, Marlies Hrad, Marcel Bühler, Thomas Kupper, Bernhard Spangl, Anders Michael Fredenslund, Marion Huber-Humer, Charlotte Scheutz
{"title":"Assessment of whole-site methane emissions from anaerobic digestion plants: Towards establishing emission factors for various plant configurations.","authors":"Viktoria Wechselberger, Marlies Hrad, Marcel Bühler, Thomas Kupper, Bernhard Spangl, Anders Michael Fredenslund, Marion Huber-Humer, Charlotte Scheutz","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission factors from biogas and wastewater treatment plants, based on primary and secondary data collected from 109 facilities. Primary emission data were measured at 19 facilities representing prevalent plant configurations across Europe. Statistical analysis highlights two categorical variables, namely primary feedstock and plant size, expressed as CH<sub>4</sub> production (≤250 kgh<sup>-1</sup>: small and medium-sized plants, >250 kgh<sup>-1</sup>: large plants), each of which has a significant impact on whole-site CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. Additionally, digestate storage (gastight vs. not-gastight) has a meaningful effect when considering CH<sub>4</sub> production as a continuous variable in the statistical analysis. Our results indicate that wastewater treatment plants have the highest average CH<sub>4</sub> losses (7.0 % of CH<sub>4</sub> produced, n = 31 or 0.10 kgpopulation equivalent(PE)<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>, n = 28), followed by manure-based plants (3.7 %, n = 49), biowaste treatment facilities (2.8 %, n = 11) and energy crop-processing plants (1.9 %, n = 14). Furthermore, small and medium-sized plants have elevated emissions (5.6 %, n = 67) compared to larger counterparts (2.2 %, n = 42), primarily attributed to the absence of gastight digestate storage. Emissions tend to be lower with gastight digestate storage (2.7 %, n = 61) than not-gastight storage options (6.2 %, n = 48). Emission factors were determined for normal operating conditions, with a further investigation into other-than-normal operating conditions revealing temporal or constant emission peaks in eight out of 19 facilities. These peaks, suggesting potential areas for targeted mitigation strategies, were attributed to pressure relief valves, flare ignition problems and major leakages.</p>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"191 ","pages":"253-263"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.11.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines methane (CH4) emission factors from biogas and wastewater treatment plants, based on primary and secondary data collected from 109 facilities. Primary emission data were measured at 19 facilities representing prevalent plant configurations across Europe. Statistical analysis highlights two categorical variables, namely primary feedstock and plant size, expressed as CH4 production (≤250 kgh-1: small and medium-sized plants, >250 kgh-1: large plants), each of which has a significant impact on whole-site CH4 emissions. Additionally, digestate storage (gastight vs. not-gastight) has a meaningful effect when considering CH4 production as a continuous variable in the statistical analysis. Our results indicate that wastewater treatment plants have the highest average CH4 losses (7.0 % of CH4 produced, n = 31 or 0.10 kgpopulation equivalent(PE)-1yr-1, n = 28), followed by manure-based plants (3.7 %, n = 49), biowaste treatment facilities (2.8 %, n = 11) and energy crop-processing plants (1.9 %, n = 14). Furthermore, small and medium-sized plants have elevated emissions (5.6 %, n = 67) compared to larger counterparts (2.2 %, n = 42), primarily attributed to the absence of gastight digestate storage. Emissions tend to be lower with gastight digestate storage (2.7 %, n = 61) than not-gastight storage options (6.2 %, n = 48). Emission factors were determined for normal operating conditions, with a further investigation into other-than-normal operating conditions revealing temporal or constant emission peaks in eight out of 19 facilities. These peaks, suggesting potential areas for targeted mitigation strategies, were attributed to pressure relief valves, flare ignition problems and major leakages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厌氧消化工厂全厂甲烷排放评估:为各种工厂配置确定排放系数。
本研究根据从 109 个设施收集的一级和二级数据,研究了沼气和污水处理厂的甲烷(CH4)排放因子。主要排放数据是在 19 个代表欧洲普遍工厂配置的设施中测量的。统计分析强调了两个分类变量,即主要原料和工厂规模,以 CH4 产量表示(≤250 kgh-1:中小型工厂,>250 kgh-1:大型工厂),其中每个变量都对整个工厂的 CH4 排放量有显著影响。此外,在统计分析中将甲烷产量视为连续变量时,沼渣储存(密闭与非密闭)也会产生有意义的影响。我们的研究结果表明,污水处理厂的平均甲烷损失量最高(占甲烷产量的 7.0%,n = 31 或 0.10 千克人口当量(PE)-1 年-1,n = 28),其次是粪便处理厂(3.7%,n = 49)、生物垃圾处理设施(2.8%,n = 11)和能源作物加工厂(1.9%,n = 14)。此外,中小型工厂的排放量(5.6%,n = 67)高于大型工厂(2.2%,n = 42),主要原因是没有气密沼渣存储。气密沼渣储存的排放量(2.7%,n = 61)往往低于非气密储存方案(6.2%,n = 48)。排放因子是在正常运行条件下确定的,对非正常运行条件的进一步调查显示,在 19 个设施中,有 8 个出现了时间性或持续性排放峰值。这些峰值表明可能需要采取有针对性的减排战略,其原因是泄压阀、火炬点火问题和重大泄漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
期刊最新文献
Assessing the resource potential of paper and board in lightweight packaging waste sorting plants through manual analysis and sensor-based material flow monitoring. Assessment of whole-site methane emissions from anaerobic digestion plants: Towards establishing emission factors for various plant configurations. Influence of processed tea waste ash on the hydration products and mechanical property of hybrid cement as an eco-friendly solution. Projected waste and recycling potential of China's photovoltaic industry. Losses and emissions in polypropylene recycling from household packaging waste.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1