Language enables the acquisition of distinct sensorimotor memories for speech.

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106010
Daniel R Lametti, Emma D Wheeler, Samantha Palatinus, Imane Hocine, Douglas M Shiller
{"title":"Language enables the acquisition of distinct sensorimotor memories for speech.","authors":"Daniel R Lametti, Emma D Wheeler, Samantha Palatinus, Imane Hocine, Douglas M Shiller","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interactions between the context in which a sensorimotor skill is learned and the recall of that memory have been primarily studied in limb movements, but speech production requires movement, and many aspects of speech processing are influenced by task-relevant contextual information. Here, in ecologically valid speech (read sentences), we test whether English-French bilinguals can use the language of production to acquire and recall distinct motor plans for similar speech sounds spanning the production workspace. Participants experienced real-time alterations of auditory feedback while producing interleaved English and French sentences. The alterations were equal in magnitude but opposite in direction between languages. Over three experiments (n = 15 in each), we observed language-specific sensorimotor learning in speech that countered the alterations and persisted after the alterations were removed. The effects were not observed in a fourth experiment (n = 15) when the feedback alterations were tied to a non-linguistic cue. In a fifth experiment (n = 15), we provide further confirmation that the observed language-specific changes in speech production were confined to sentence production, the linguistic level at which they were learned. The results contrast with recent work and theories of second language learning that predict broad interference between L1 and L2 phonetic representations. When faced with contrasting sensorimotor demands between languages, bilinguals readily acquire and recall highly specific motor representations for speech.</p>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"254 ","pages":"106010"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interactions between the context in which a sensorimotor skill is learned and the recall of that memory have been primarily studied in limb movements, but speech production requires movement, and many aspects of speech processing are influenced by task-relevant contextual information. Here, in ecologically valid speech (read sentences), we test whether English-French bilinguals can use the language of production to acquire and recall distinct motor plans for similar speech sounds spanning the production workspace. Participants experienced real-time alterations of auditory feedback while producing interleaved English and French sentences. The alterations were equal in magnitude but opposite in direction between languages. Over three experiments (n = 15 in each), we observed language-specific sensorimotor learning in speech that countered the alterations and persisted after the alterations were removed. The effects were not observed in a fourth experiment (n = 15) when the feedback alterations were tied to a non-linguistic cue. In a fifth experiment (n = 15), we provide further confirmation that the observed language-specific changes in speech production were confined to sentence production, the linguistic level at which they were learned. The results contrast with recent work and theories of second language learning that predict broad interference between L1 and L2 phonetic representations. When faced with contrasting sensorimotor demands between languages, bilinguals readily acquire and recall highly specific motor representations for speech.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言能让人获得与言语不同的感官运动记忆。
感官运动技能的学习环境与该记忆的回忆之间的相互作用主要是在肢体运动中进行研究的,但语音的产生需要运动,而且语音处理的许多方面都受到任务相关环境信息的影响。在此,我们测试了在生态有效的语音(读句子)中,英法双语者是否能利用语言生产来获取和回忆跨越生产工作空间的类似语音的不同运动计划。受试者在发出交错的英语和法语句子时,会经历听觉反馈的实时变化。不同语言的听觉反馈变化幅度相同,但方向相反。在三次实验中(每次实验的人数为 15 人),我们观察到了特定语言在语音方面的感觉运动学习,这种学习抵消了改变,并在改变消除后继续存在。在第四个实验(n = 15)中,当反馈改变与非语言线索联系在一起时,没有观察到这种效果。在第五个实验(n = 15)中,我们进一步证实了所观察到的特定语言的语音生成变化仅限于句子生成,而句子生成正是学习这些变化的语言层面。这些结果与最近的研究和第二语言学习理论所预测的第一语言和第二语言语音表征之间的广泛干扰形成了鲜明对比。当面对不同语言之间截然不同的感觉运动要求时,双语者很容易获得并回忆起高度特定的语音运动表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
Partisan language in a polarized world: In-group language provides reputational benefits to speakers while polarizing audiences. What's left of the leftward bias in scene viewing? Lateral asymmetries in information processing during early search guidance. Language enables the acquisition of distinct sensorimotor memories for speech. Morality on the road: Should machine drivers be more utilitarian than human drivers? Relative source credibility affects the continued influence effect: Evidence of rationality in the CIE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1