The Relationship Between Attitudes Towards Academic Self-Efficacy and Self and Peer Assessment in Turkish Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70094
Olga İncesu, Sevim Ulupınar
{"title":"The Relationship Between Attitudes Towards Academic Self-Efficacy and Self and Peer Assessment in Turkish Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Olga İncesu, Sevim Ulupınar","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Academic self-efficacy (ASE), as well as self (SA) and peer assessment (PA), is associated with the subjective judgements of the individual. The correlation among these concepts merits further research. This study aims to examine the correlation between nursing students' attitudes towards ASE and SA and PA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a correlational cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 1401 nursing students from five universities in Istanbul, Turkey. The study employed the proportional quota sampling method. The data were collected using a Personal Information Form, View Scale for Peer and Self-Assessment and ASE Scale. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression model (stepwise) tests were used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistics revealed that 82.2% of the participants were female and their Academic Grade Point Average was 3.00 ± 0.48. As a result of the regression analysis, it was determined that students' age, gender, perception of academic achievement, status of receiving PA training and attitudes towards doing PA and self-assessment significantly predicted their ASE score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Students' ASE was found to be medium-level, their attitudes towards peer and self-assessment were high and SA and PA attitudes was associated with ASE.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>A total of 1401 undergraduate nursing students from five undergraduate universities participated in the study and responded to questions on ASE, peer assessment, self assessment, etc.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 11","pages":"e70094"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Academic self-efficacy (ASE), as well as self (SA) and peer assessment (PA), is associated with the subjective judgements of the individual. The correlation among these concepts merits further research. This study aims to examine the correlation between nursing students' attitudes towards ASE and SA and PA.

Design: This is a correlational cross-sectional study.

Methods: The sample consisted of 1401 nursing students from five universities in Istanbul, Turkey. The study employed the proportional quota sampling method. The data were collected using a Personal Information Form, View Scale for Peer and Self-Assessment and ASE Scale. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression model (stepwise) tests were used to analyse the data.

Results: Descriptive statistics revealed that 82.2% of the participants were female and their Academic Grade Point Average was 3.00 ± 0.48. As a result of the regression analysis, it was determined that students' age, gender, perception of academic achievement, status of receiving PA training and attitudes towards doing PA and self-assessment significantly predicted their ASE score.

Conclusions: Students' ASE was found to be medium-level, their attitudes towards peer and self-assessment were high and SA and PA attitudes was associated with ASE.

Patient or public contribution: A total of 1401 undergraduate nursing students from five undergraduate universities participated in the study and responded to questions on ASE, peer assessment, self assessment, etc.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其护理专业学生对学术自我效能感的态度与自我评价和同伴评价之间的关系:一项横断面研究
目的:学业自我效能感(ASE)以及自我评价(SA)和同伴评价(PA)与个人的主观判断有关。这些概念之间的相关性值得进一步研究。本研究旨在探讨护理专业学生对 ASE 以及 SA 和 PA 的态度之间的相关性:设计:这是一项相关横断面研究:样本包括来自土耳其伊斯坦布尔五所大学的 1401 名护理专业学生。研究采用比例配额抽样法。数据收集采用个人信息表、同伴和自我评估视角量表以及 ASE 量表。数据分析采用了描述性统计和多元线性回归模型(逐步)检验:描述性统计显示,82.2%的参与者为女性,她们的平均学分绩点为 3.00 ± 0.48。回归分析结果表明,学生的年龄、性别、对学业成绩的看法、接受 PA 培训的情况以及对做 PA 和自我评估的态度对其 ASE 分数有显著的预测作用:发现学生的 ASE 处于中等水平,他们对同伴和自我评估的态度较高,SA 和 PA 态度与 ASE 相关:共有来自 5 所本科院校的 1401 名护理专业本科生参与了研究,并回答了有关 ASE、互评、自评等方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
期刊最新文献
A Uniform for Narrating the Nurse in the Wheel of Time: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study. Interventions to Increase Thriving Amongst Older People in Care Homes and Factors Contributing to Their Thriving Experience-A Scoping Review. Patient Safety Attitudes of Hospital Nurses: An Ethnographic Study in Four European Countries. Colonial Mentality and Diabetes Self-Management in Filipino Americans. Pain in Hospital: A Real-Word Data Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1