{"title":"RyR cooperativity and mobile buffers: functional clues to the resolution of the cardiac calcium wave problem?","authors":"Michael A. Colman","doi":"10.1113/JP287762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spontaneous calcium (Ca<sup>2+</sup>) sparks and propagating Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves have been closely linked to the cellular mechanisms underlying cardiac arrhythmias. The resulting spontaneous Ca<sup>2+</sup> transients can activate the sodium–calcium exchanger, generating an inward current that may lead to early or delayed afterdepolarisations that can serve as both triggers and substrate for arrhythmogenesis (Liu et al., <span>2015</span>). Understanding these phenomena is therefore crucial for elucidation of the mechanisms of arrhythmia.</p><p>Spontaneous Ca<sup>2+</sup> sparks occur in restricted subspaces that mediate Ca<sup>2+</sup>-induced-Ca<sup>2+</sup>-release (CICR) and arise from the spontaneous opening of clusters of ryanodine receptors (RyRs), the channels responsible for Ca<sup>2+</sup> release. Diffusion of Ca<sup>2+</sup> between neighbouring clusters provides a mechanism for the nucleation and propagation of spontaneous Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves throughout the cell. This ‘fire-diffuse-fire’ mechanism posits a reasonable and simple explanation for the propagation of Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves. Given this, one could very well then ask: wherein lies the problem?</p><p>The issue at the heart of the Ca<sup>2+</sup> wave problem is that our contemporary computational models of spatial Ca<sup>2+</sup> handling at the whole-cell scale, based on our best functional and structural knowledge, struggle to reproduce sustained, propagating Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves under physiological conditions. This suggests that something is missing from our theoretical understanding.</p><p>For a Ca<sup>2+</sup> spark to propagate between clusters, the local concentration elevation at the neighbouring cluster must be sufficient to induce CICR. Yet, it is necessarily not much higher than diastolic levels due to buffering and the impact of diffusion in three dimensions; RyR model parameters that induce CICR at these concentrations often lead to excessive spontaneous sparks and arrhythmogenesis. Models have therefore had to make compromises to solve this problem (Colman et al., <span>2022</span>), either incorporating ‘natural’ spatial coupling but relying on large Ca<sup>2+</sup> transients (>4 µM) to propagate Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves, or by ‘artificially’ strengthening the spatial coupling through the inclusion of coupled Ca<sup>2+</sup> subspaces, with the benefit of maintaining physiological Ca<sup>2+</sup> transients (∼0.5–1 µM). It seems, at least, almost impossible for detailed models to fulfil both normal CICR and sustained Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves without relying on these coupled subspaces, which lack structural evidence.</p><p>It is likely no coincidence that diseased myocytes that are very prone to sustained Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves have been observed with severe structural remodelling, such as a loss of the transverse and axial tubule system, fragmentation of the arrangement of RyRs within clusters and rearrangement of inter-cluster spacing, and remodelling of other organelles such as mitochondria. For instance, Miragoli et al. (<span>2016</span>) showed that microtubule disorganization displaced mitochondria, creating local structures that could facilitate Ca<sup>2+</sup> wave propagation. These factors can't, however, explain the observation of Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves in non-diseased myocytes. Whereas it may seem unnecessary to focus substantial efforts on reproducing Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves in healthy conditions, given that their incidence is likely too low to have any impact on tissue dynamics, it is nevertheless imperative that we can construct models that reproduce simultaneously the range of normal physiological behaviours, such that we can have confidence in the translation of those models to disease conditions.</p><p>Recognising the importance of this fundamental challenge, Zhong and Karma (<span>2024</span>), develop a highly sophisticated model of spatial Ca<sup>2+</sup> handling at the whole-cell scale that is applied to explore the impact of various functional parameters on CICR and Ca<sup>2+</sup> wave dynamics. A primary focus of their study is the cooperativity of the RyRs within a single cluster. Similar to previous work showing that increased cooperativity among subunits of a single RyR channel enabled stable closed states at diastolic Ca<sup>2+</sup> levels and robust CICR sensitivity (Greene et al., <span>2023</span>), the authors found that higher cooperativity supports Ca<sup>2+</sup> wave propagation without inducing unphysiologically large Ca<sup>2+</sup> spark rates: the model enabled sustained Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves under parameters that gave a Ca<sup>2+</sup> transient magnitude closer to that expected (∼2 µM <i>vs</i>. 0.5–1 µM, rather than ∼4+ µM of previous studies). It is notable, however, that in all conditions with a Ca<sup>2+</sup> transient during normal pacing that is closer to 1 µM, no waves were sustained.</p><p>Other important factors emerged from their analysis that may provide further clues to the underlying dynamics that facilitate Ca<sup>2+</sup> wave propagation. The authors found that the inclusion of mobile ATP buffering was <i>necessary</i> to sustain Ca<sup>2+</sup> waves and delayed afterdepolarisations; this feature may significantly contribute to the improvements seen in their model compared with previous ones. These results perhaps offer intriguing insight into the solution to this problem: our coarse-grained, simplistic approximations of Ca<sup>2+</sup> diffusion as a continuum may be inadequate to capture the underlying complexity at these spatial scales and within the intricate sub-cellular geometry. Careful consideration of the local pathways that Ca<sup>2+</sup> ions may take between adjacent RyR clusters may be required to fully explain Ca<sup>2+</sup> wave propagation in a range of conditions.</p><p>Undoubtedly, multiple factors including RyR cooperativity, mobile buffers and structural relationships such as RyR arrangement and inter-cluster coupling, will work together to explain experimental observations. The interplay between these multiple factors, and how each is modulated in disease to provide a highly arrhythmogenic substrate, remains to be fully elucidated. This study by Zhong and Karma, which explores multiple factors in much greater detail than is summarized here, represents an exciting step towards resolving a core issue in our understanding of (patho)physiological cellular and tissue electrical dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"602 24","pages":"6637-6638"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP287762","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP287762","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spontaneous calcium (Ca2+) sparks and propagating Ca2+ waves have been closely linked to the cellular mechanisms underlying cardiac arrhythmias. The resulting spontaneous Ca2+ transients can activate the sodium–calcium exchanger, generating an inward current that may lead to early or delayed afterdepolarisations that can serve as both triggers and substrate for arrhythmogenesis (Liu et al., 2015). Understanding these phenomena is therefore crucial for elucidation of the mechanisms of arrhythmia.
Spontaneous Ca2+ sparks occur in restricted subspaces that mediate Ca2+-induced-Ca2+-release (CICR) and arise from the spontaneous opening of clusters of ryanodine receptors (RyRs), the channels responsible for Ca2+ release. Diffusion of Ca2+ between neighbouring clusters provides a mechanism for the nucleation and propagation of spontaneous Ca2+ waves throughout the cell. This ‘fire-diffuse-fire’ mechanism posits a reasonable and simple explanation for the propagation of Ca2+ waves. Given this, one could very well then ask: wherein lies the problem?
The issue at the heart of the Ca2+ wave problem is that our contemporary computational models of spatial Ca2+ handling at the whole-cell scale, based on our best functional and structural knowledge, struggle to reproduce sustained, propagating Ca2+ waves under physiological conditions. This suggests that something is missing from our theoretical understanding.
For a Ca2+ spark to propagate between clusters, the local concentration elevation at the neighbouring cluster must be sufficient to induce CICR. Yet, it is necessarily not much higher than diastolic levels due to buffering and the impact of diffusion in three dimensions; RyR model parameters that induce CICR at these concentrations often lead to excessive spontaneous sparks and arrhythmogenesis. Models have therefore had to make compromises to solve this problem (Colman et al., 2022), either incorporating ‘natural’ spatial coupling but relying on large Ca2+ transients (>4 µM) to propagate Ca2+ waves, or by ‘artificially’ strengthening the spatial coupling through the inclusion of coupled Ca2+ subspaces, with the benefit of maintaining physiological Ca2+ transients (∼0.5–1 µM). It seems, at least, almost impossible for detailed models to fulfil both normal CICR and sustained Ca2+ waves without relying on these coupled subspaces, which lack structural evidence.
It is likely no coincidence that diseased myocytes that are very prone to sustained Ca2+ waves have been observed with severe structural remodelling, such as a loss of the transverse and axial tubule system, fragmentation of the arrangement of RyRs within clusters and rearrangement of inter-cluster spacing, and remodelling of other organelles such as mitochondria. For instance, Miragoli et al. (2016) showed that microtubule disorganization displaced mitochondria, creating local structures that could facilitate Ca2+ wave propagation. These factors can't, however, explain the observation of Ca2+ waves in non-diseased myocytes. Whereas it may seem unnecessary to focus substantial efforts on reproducing Ca2+ waves in healthy conditions, given that their incidence is likely too low to have any impact on tissue dynamics, it is nevertheless imperative that we can construct models that reproduce simultaneously the range of normal physiological behaviours, such that we can have confidence in the translation of those models to disease conditions.
Recognising the importance of this fundamental challenge, Zhong and Karma (2024), develop a highly sophisticated model of spatial Ca2+ handling at the whole-cell scale that is applied to explore the impact of various functional parameters on CICR and Ca2+ wave dynamics. A primary focus of their study is the cooperativity of the RyRs within a single cluster. Similar to previous work showing that increased cooperativity among subunits of a single RyR channel enabled stable closed states at diastolic Ca2+ levels and robust CICR sensitivity (Greene et al., 2023), the authors found that higher cooperativity supports Ca2+ wave propagation without inducing unphysiologically large Ca2+ spark rates: the model enabled sustained Ca2+ waves under parameters that gave a Ca2+ transient magnitude closer to that expected (∼2 µM vs. 0.5–1 µM, rather than ∼4+ µM of previous studies). It is notable, however, that in all conditions with a Ca2+ transient during normal pacing that is closer to 1 µM, no waves were sustained.
Other important factors emerged from their analysis that may provide further clues to the underlying dynamics that facilitate Ca2+ wave propagation. The authors found that the inclusion of mobile ATP buffering was necessary to sustain Ca2+ waves and delayed afterdepolarisations; this feature may significantly contribute to the improvements seen in their model compared with previous ones. These results perhaps offer intriguing insight into the solution to this problem: our coarse-grained, simplistic approximations of Ca2+ diffusion as a continuum may be inadequate to capture the underlying complexity at these spatial scales and within the intricate sub-cellular geometry. Careful consideration of the local pathways that Ca2+ ions may take between adjacent RyR clusters may be required to fully explain Ca2+ wave propagation in a range of conditions.
Undoubtedly, multiple factors including RyR cooperativity, mobile buffers and structural relationships such as RyR arrangement and inter-cluster coupling, will work together to explain experimental observations. The interplay between these multiple factors, and how each is modulated in disease to provide a highly arrhythmogenic substrate, remains to be fully elucidated. This study by Zhong and Karma, which explores multiple factors in much greater detail than is summarized here, represents an exciting step towards resolving a core issue in our understanding of (patho)physiological cellular and tissue electrical dynamics.
自发钙(Ca2+)火花和传播Ca2+波与心律失常的细胞机制密切相关。由此产生的自发Ca2+瞬态可以激活钠钙交换器,产生向内电流,可能导致早期或延迟的后去极化,这可以作为心律失常的触发器和底物(Liu et al., 2015)。因此,了解这些现象对于阐明心律失常的机制至关重要。自发Ca2+火花发生在介导Ca2+诱导的Ca2+释放(CICR)的受限亚空间中,并由负责Ca2+释放的ryanodine受体(RyRs)簇的自发打开引起。Ca2+在相邻簇之间的扩散为自发Ca2+波在细胞内的成核和传播提供了一种机制。这种“火-扩散-火”机制为Ca2+波的传播提供了一个合理而简单的解释。鉴于此,人们很可能会问:问题在哪里?Ca2+波问题的核心问题是,基于我们最好的功能和结构知识,我们当代的全细胞尺度空间Ca2+处理计算模型难以在生理条件下复制持续的、传播的Ca2+波。这表明我们的理论认识中缺少了一些东西。对于Ca2+火花在簇之间传播,邻近簇的局部浓度升高必须足以诱导CICR。然而,由于缓冲和三维扩散的影响,它不一定比舒张期水平高很多;在这些浓度下诱导CICR的RyR模型参数通常会导致过度的自发火花和心律失常。因此,模型必须做出妥协来解决这个问题(科尔曼等人,2022),要么纳入“自然”空间耦合,但依赖于大的Ca2+瞬态(>4µM)来传播Ca2+波,要么通过包含耦合的Ca2+子空间“人为”加强空间耦合,以维持生理Ca2+瞬态(~ 0.5-1µM)的好处。至少,如果不依赖于这些缺乏结构证据的耦合子空间,详细模型几乎不可能同时满足正常的CICR和持续的Ca2+波。很可能不是巧合的是,患病的肌细胞非常容易受到持续的Ca2+波的影响,观察到严重的结构重塑,如横向和轴向小管系统的丧失,簇内ryr排列的碎片化和簇间间距的重排,以及线粒体等其他细胞器的重塑。例如,Miragoli等人(2016)表明,微管破坏取代了线粒体,创造了促进Ca2+波传播的局部结构。然而,这些因素不能解释在未患病的肌细胞中观察到的Ca2+波。鉴于其发生率可能太低,不会对组织动力学产生任何影响,因此似乎没有必要集中大量精力在健康条件下复制Ca2+波,然而,我们必须构建能够同时复制正常生理行为范围的模型,这样我们就可以有信心将这些模型翻译为疾病条件。认识到这一基本挑战的重要性,钟和Karma(2024)在全细胞尺度上开发了一个高度复杂的空间Ca2+处理模型,用于探索各种功能参数对CICR和Ca2+波动力学的影响。他们研究的主要焦点是单个集群中ryr的协作性。与先前的研究相似,表明单个RyR通道亚基之间的协同性增加能够在舒张期Ca2+水平下实现稳定的关闭状态和强大的CICR敏感性(Greene等人,2023),作者发现更高的协同性支持Ca2+波传播,而不会诱导非生理上的大Ca2+放电速率。该模型在Ca2+瞬态量级更接近预期的参数下使持续的Ca2+波(~ 2µM vs. 0.5-1µM,而不是以前研究的~ 4+µM)。然而,值得注意的是,在正常起搏期间Ca2+瞬态接近1µM的所有条件下,没有持续的波。从他们的分析中出现的其他重要因素可能为促进Ca2+波传播的潜在动力学提供进一步的线索。作者发现,包含移动ATP缓冲对于维持Ca2+波和延迟后去极化是必要的;与以前的模型相比,这个特性可能会显著地促进模型的改进。 这些结果可能为这个问题的解决方案提供了有趣的见解:我们对Ca2+扩散的粗粒度,简单的近似作为一个连续体可能不足以捕捉这些空间尺度和复杂的亚细胞几何结构中的潜在复杂性。仔细考虑Ca2+离子在相邻RyR簇之间可能采取的局部途径,可能需要充分解释Ca2+波在一系列条件下的传播。毫无疑问,包括RyR协同性、移动缓冲以及RyR排列和簇间耦合等结构关系在内的多种因素将共同作用来解释实验观察结果。这些多种因素之间的相互作用,以及每个因素如何在疾病中被调节以提供高度致心律失常的底物,仍有待充分阐明。Zhong和Karma的这项研究对多种因素进行了更详细的探索,这代表了我们在解决(病理)生理细胞和组织电动力学的核心问题方面迈出了令人兴奋的一步。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew.
The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.