Application of problem-based learning and case-based learning in teaching ectopic pregnancy to fifth-year medical students.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06327-9
Weimin Xie, Ya Li, Xiaohang Liu
{"title":"Application of problem-based learning and case-based learning in teaching ectopic pregnancy to fifth-year medical students.","authors":"Weimin Xie, Ya Li, Xiaohang Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06327-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the effectiveness of combining problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) in the clinical teaching of ectopic pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifth-year students majoring in clinical medicine were recruited from the Department of Gynecology at the Hengyang Central Hospital and Hainan General Hospital between September 2023 and June 2024. The students were randomly assigned to either the combined PBL-CBL or the traditional group. At the end of the class, both groups of students were required to complete a post-class quiz and an anonymous questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The basic knowledge score in the combined PBL-CBL group was significantly higher than that in the traditional group (42.6 ± 3.6 vs 35.0 ± 2.3, p = 0.000). Similarly, the case analysis score was higher in the combined PBL-CBL group than that in the traditional group (37.1 ± 6.2 versus 33.8 ± 5.7, p = 0.013). The scores for learning motivation, understanding, student-teacher interaction, communication skills, clinical thinking skills, self-learning skills, knowledge absorption, and satisfaction with the course in the combined PBL-CBL group were significantly higher than those in the traditional group (p < 0.05). However, the score for the amount of free time consumed by the combined PBL-CBL group was significantly higher than that of the traditional group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that the combined PBL-CBL teaching method might be a promising new mode of gynecological education.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"24 1","pages":"1346"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06327-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study explored the effectiveness of combining problem-based learning (PBL) and case-based learning (CBL) in the clinical teaching of ectopic pregnancy.

Methods: Fifth-year students majoring in clinical medicine were recruited from the Department of Gynecology at the Hengyang Central Hospital and Hainan General Hospital between September 2023 and June 2024. The students were randomly assigned to either the combined PBL-CBL or the traditional group. At the end of the class, both groups of students were required to complete a post-class quiz and an anonymous questionnaire.

Results: The basic knowledge score in the combined PBL-CBL group was significantly higher than that in the traditional group (42.6 ± 3.6 vs 35.0 ± 2.3, p = 0.000). Similarly, the case analysis score was higher in the combined PBL-CBL group than that in the traditional group (37.1 ± 6.2 versus 33.8 ± 5.7, p = 0.013). The scores for learning motivation, understanding, student-teacher interaction, communication skills, clinical thinking skills, self-learning skills, knowledge absorption, and satisfaction with the course in the combined PBL-CBL group were significantly higher than those in the traditional group (p < 0.05). However, the score for the amount of free time consumed by the combined PBL-CBL group was significantly higher than that of the traditional group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The study suggests that the combined PBL-CBL teaching method might be a promising new mode of gynecological education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在五年级医学生的异位妊娠教学中应用问题式学习和案例式学习。
目的本研究探讨了基于问题的学习(PBL)和基于案例的学习(CBL)在异位妊娠临床教学中的结合效果:2023年9月至2024年6月期间,在衡阳市中心医院和海南总医院妇科招收临床医学专业五年级学生。学生被随机分配到PBL-CBL联合组或传统组。下课后,两组学生均需完成课后测验和匿名问卷调查:结果:PBL-CBL 综合组的基础知识得分明显高于传统组(42.6 ± 3.6 vs 35.0 ± 2.3,p = 0.000)。同样,PBL-CBL 综合组的案例分析得分也高于传统组(37.1 ± 6.2 对 33.8 ± 5.7,p = 0.013)。PBL-CBL联合组的学习动机、理解能力、师生互动、沟通能力、临床思维能力、自学能力、知识吸收能力和对课程的满意度得分均显著高于传统组(P 结论:PBL-CBL联合组的学习动机、理解能力、师生互动、沟通能力、临床思维能力、自学能力、知识吸收能力和对课程的满意度得分均显著高于传统组:该研究表明,PBL-CBL 联合教学法可能是一种很有前途的妇科教育新模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Medical students' perceptions of a community-engaged learning approach to community health in Ghana: the Students' Community Engagement Programme (SCEP). Medical students' perspectives of reflection for their professional development. Perception of undergraduate medical students and examiners towards grand objective structured clinical examination. Satisfaction and learning experience of students using online learning platforms for medical education. Using the adaptive action method to tackle wicked problems in rural faculty development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1