Managing non-traumatic musculoskeletal conditions presenting to emergency departments: Do patient profiles vary between a physiotherapy-led 'Diversion' pathway and routine care?
Robert Waller, Mathew McLaughlin, Sarah King, Jessica Lai, Reuben Holt, Pippa Flanagan, Ivan Lin, Karen Richards, Piers Truter
{"title":"Managing non-traumatic musculoskeletal conditions presenting to emergency departments: Do patient profiles vary between a physiotherapy-led 'Diversion' pathway and routine care?","authors":"Robert Waller, Mathew McLaughlin, Sarah King, Jessica Lai, Reuben Holt, Pippa Flanagan, Ivan Lin, Karen Richards, Piers Truter","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low urgency, non-traumatic musculoskeletal presentations are common in emergency departments. Although care is safe, it is expensive, and low priority. Pathways diverting these patients from emergency departments to physiotherapy care may improve hospital outcomes. Identifying the suitable patient profile for these pathways is important.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed prospective and retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study investigated adults aged 18-65 presenting to two emergency departments. Suitable patients were diverted directly to a physiotherapy outpatient diversion pathway. Three groups were compared, diverted patients, patients suitable but not diverted, and patients unsuitable for diversion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diverted patients were aged 43 (median, inter-quartile range 34-53.5) years, triaged as low-urgency, self-referred, self-transported, and had few concerning features of serious pathology. Diverted patients had a 113-minute shorter emergency stay at 79 (median) minutes compared to suitable but not diverted patients, and both groups had a similar profile. Most (93.4 %) diverted patients were discharged within 4- hours, compared to suitable but not diverted patients (72.9 %). Key factors preventing diversion were concern for serious pathology or diversion capacity restraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A group of patients with non-traumatic musculoskeletal conditions who can be safely diverted to physiotherapy outpatients are described. Diversion impact was high quality care and improved emergency department metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.08.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Low urgency, non-traumatic musculoskeletal presentations are common in emergency departments. Although care is safe, it is expensive, and low priority. Pathways diverting these patients from emergency departments to physiotherapy care may improve hospital outcomes. Identifying the suitable patient profile for these pathways is important.
Methods: A mixed prospective and retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study investigated adults aged 18-65 presenting to two emergency departments. Suitable patients were diverted directly to a physiotherapy outpatient diversion pathway. Three groups were compared, diverted patients, patients suitable but not diverted, and patients unsuitable for diversion.
Results: Diverted patients were aged 43 (median, inter-quartile range 34-53.5) years, triaged as low-urgency, self-referred, self-transported, and had few concerning features of serious pathology. Diverted patients had a 113-minute shorter emergency stay at 79 (median) minutes compared to suitable but not diverted patients, and both groups had a similar profile. Most (93.4 %) diverted patients were discharged within 4- hours, compared to suitable but not diverted patients (72.9 %). Key factors preventing diversion were concern for serious pathology or diversion capacity restraints.
Conclusion: A group of patients with non-traumatic musculoskeletal conditions who can be safely diverted to physiotherapy outpatients are described. Diversion impact was high quality care and improved emergency department metrics.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.