Revealing the nitrogen and phosphorus removal potential: Insights into surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetlands employing integrated iron and sulfur electron donors

IF 7.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety and Environmental Protection Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.psep.2024.11.052
Azharuddin Chachar , Shanshan Sun , Yuanyuan Peng , Xushun Gu , Yu Zhang , Shengbing He
{"title":"Revealing the nitrogen and phosphorus removal potential: Insights into surface flow and subsurface flow constructed wetlands employing integrated iron and sulfur electron donors","authors":"Azharuddin Chachar ,&nbsp;Shanshan Sun ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Peng ,&nbsp;Xushun Gu ,&nbsp;Yu Zhang ,&nbsp;Shengbing He","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2024.11.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the differences in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal performance, nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions, and microbial community structure between surface flow (SF) and subsurface flow (SSF) constructed wetlands (CWs) using iron scraps (ISs) and elemental sulfur (S<sup>0</sup>) as integrated electron donors. Four configurations were examined: control SFCW (SF-C), ISs and S<sup>0</sup> SFCW (SF-Fe+S), control SSFCW (SSF-C), and ISs and S<sup>0</sup> SSFCW (SSF-Fe+S). The results indicated that both CW types utilizing combined ISs and S<sup>0</sup> were effective in removing N, with SF-Fe+S (35.73–72.71 %) exhibiting higher nitrate removal efficiency compared to SSF-Fe+S (10.05–61.27 %). However, SSF-Fe+S (77.88–85.72 %) demonstrated a greater efficiency in removing total phosphorus (TP) than SF-Fe+S (50.78–67.91 %). In addition, both SSFCWs, SSF-C (7.22 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d) and SSF-Fe+S (3.39 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d) exhibited higher N<sub>2</sub>O emissions compared to SFCWs, SF-C (3.05 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d) and SF-Fe+S (1.94 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/d). Microbial community analysis revealed distinct differences between CW types; <em>Dechloromonas</em> (22.45 %) and <em>Ferritrophicum</em> (18.23 %) were the dominant genera in SF-Fe+S, whereas <em>Ferritrophicum</em> (37.13 %) and <em>Acinetobacter</em> (21.80 %) predominated in SSF-Fe+S. In addition, TP removal was potentially enhanced by substrate adsorption and coprecipitation through iron (Fe<sup>2+</sup> and Fe<sup>3+</sup>) ions released from ISs corrosion reacting with phosphate (PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>) ions. The study reveals that the type of CW and the combination of electron donors significantly influence their effectiveness in removing N and P, reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, and enhancing microbial community composition, thus providing valuable insights.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"193 ","pages":"Pages 251-261"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582024014666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the differences in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) removal performance, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, and microbial community structure between surface flow (SF) and subsurface flow (SSF) constructed wetlands (CWs) using iron scraps (ISs) and elemental sulfur (S0) as integrated electron donors. Four configurations were examined: control SFCW (SF-C), ISs and S0 SFCW (SF-Fe+S), control SSFCW (SSF-C), and ISs and S0 SSFCW (SSF-Fe+S). The results indicated that both CW types utilizing combined ISs and S0 were effective in removing N, with SF-Fe+S (35.73–72.71 %) exhibiting higher nitrate removal efficiency compared to SSF-Fe+S (10.05–61.27 %). However, SSF-Fe+S (77.88–85.72 %) demonstrated a greater efficiency in removing total phosphorus (TP) than SF-Fe+S (50.78–67.91 %). In addition, both SSFCWs, SSF-C (7.22 mg/m2/d) and SSF-Fe+S (3.39 mg/m2/d) exhibited higher N2O emissions compared to SFCWs, SF-C (3.05 mg/m2/d) and SF-Fe+S (1.94 mg/m2/d). Microbial community analysis revealed distinct differences between CW types; Dechloromonas (22.45 %) and Ferritrophicum (18.23 %) were the dominant genera in SF-Fe+S, whereas Ferritrophicum (37.13 %) and Acinetobacter (21.80 %) predominated in SSF-Fe+S. In addition, TP removal was potentially enhanced by substrate adsorption and coprecipitation through iron (Fe2+ and Fe3+) ions released from ISs corrosion reacting with phosphate (PO43−) ions. The study reveals that the type of CW and the combination of electron donors significantly influence their effectiveness in removing N and P, reducing N2O emissions, and enhancing microbial community composition, thus providing valuable insights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示脱氮除磷潜力:对采用综合铁和硫电子供体的地表流和亚地表流建造湿地的启示
本研究调查了使用铁屑(ISs)和元素硫(S0)作为综合电子供体的地表流(SF)和次地表流(SSF)构建湿地(CWs)在氮(N)和磷(P)去除性能、一氧化二氮(N2O)排放以及微生物群落结构方面的差异。对四种配置进行了研究:控制 SFCW(SF-C)、ISs 和 S0 SFCW(SF-Fe+S)、控制 SSFCW(SSF-C)以及 ISs 和 S0 SSFCW(SSF-Fe+S)。结果表明,利用 ISs 和 S0 组合的两种化武类型都能有效去除氮,与 SSF-Fe+S(10.05-61.27%)相比,SF-Fe+S(35.73-72.71%)表现出更高的硝酸盐去除效率。然而,SSF-Fe+S(77.88-85.72 %)比 SF-Fe+S(50.78-67.91 %)具有更高的总磷去除效率。此外,SSFCWs、SSF-C(7.22 mg/m2/d)和 SSF-Fe+S(3.39 mg/m2/d)与 SFCWs、SF-C(3.05 mg/m2/d)和 SF-Fe+S(1.94 mg/m2/d)相比,N2O 排放量更高。微生物群落分析表明,不同类型的化武之间存在明显差异;在 SF-Fe+S 中,脱氯单胞菌(22.45%)和铁线虫(18.23%)是优势菌属,而在 SSF-Fe+S 中,铁线虫(37.13%)和醋酸杆菌(21.80%)是优势菌属。此外,通过 ISs 腐蚀释放的铁(Fe2+ 和 Fe3+)离子与磷酸盐(PO43-)离子反应,基质吸附和共沉淀可能会增强对 TP 的去除。该研究揭示了 CW 的类型和电子供体的组合对其去除氮和磷的效果、减少 N2O 排放和提高微生物群落组成的影响,从而提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
Process Safety and Environmental Protection 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
929
审稿时长
8.0 months
期刊介绍: The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice. PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers. PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.
期刊最新文献
Waste-to-resource strategy: Optimizing coal fly ash ammonium bisulfate roasting for simultaneous Ca removal and nano-Al(OH)3 synthesis for PAC production Sustainable bioremediation of HCHs-contaminated soils using organic amendments: A circular economy approach Food waste treatment by black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) and pilot-scale aerobic composting of the BSFL frass using horizontal mechanical reactor Mechanical response characteristics and damage mechanism of cemented tailings backfill in acid mine drainage environment Mechanistic insights into selective removal of Cu(II) and gentian violet by tea residue-modified LDHs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1