The most effective combination of pharmacological therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS BMC Cardiovascular Disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1186/s12872-024-04339-3
Huilin Tang, Kimberly Germinal, Alexandra Milfort, Wei-Han Chen, Shao-Hsuan Chang, Wenxi Huang, Yujia Li, Ying Lu, Mustafa M Ahmed, Stephen E Kimmel, Jiang Bian, Jingchuan Guo
{"title":"The most effective combination of pharmacological therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Huilin Tang, Kimberly Germinal, Alexandra Milfort, Wei-Han Chen, Shao-Hsuan Chang, Wenxi Huang, Yujia Li, Ying Lu, Mustafa M Ahmed, Stephen E Kimmel, Jiang Bian, Jingchuan Guo","doi":"10.1186/s12872-024-04339-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is growing. However, there is no consensus on the most effective treatment for HFrEF. This study aimed to evaluate the most effective combination of pharmacological therapy in patients with HFrEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL up to Feb 2022, to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of pharmacological treatment among adults (≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of HFrEF (defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%). The outcomes of interest included all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). A random network meta-analysis using a frequentist framework model was employed to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and rank the treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 49 RCTs involving 90,529 participants with HFrEF. For reducing all-cause mortality, the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was most effective (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.66). For CV death, the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and Vericiguat showed the highest efficacy (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.90). Regarding reducing HHF, the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i as well as the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and Ivabradine were equally the most effective (both RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides robust evidence supporting the use of combination therapies in HFrEF management, with newer agents offering incremental benefits when added to established guideline-directed medical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9195,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","volume":"24 1","pages":"666"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cardiovascular Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04339-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is growing. However, there is no consensus on the most effective treatment for HFrEF. This study aimed to evaluate the most effective combination of pharmacological therapy in patients with HFrEF.

Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL up to Feb 2022, to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of pharmacological treatment among adults (≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of HFrEF (defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%). The outcomes of interest included all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). A random network meta-analysis using a frequentist framework model was employed to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and rank the treatments.

Results: We included 49 RCTs involving 90,529 participants with HFrEF. For reducing all-cause mortality, the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was most effective (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.66). For CV death, the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and Vericiguat showed the highest efficacy (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.90). Regarding reducing HHF, the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i as well as the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and Ivabradine were equally the most effective (both RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.39).

Conclusion: This study provides robust evidence supporting the use of combination therapies in HFrEF management, with newer agents offering incremental benefits when added to established guideline-directed medical therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
射血分数降低型心力衰竭最有效的药物治疗组合:随机对照试验网络荟萃分析。
背景:射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)的药物疗法疗效的证据越来越多。然而,对于治疗射血分数减低性心力衰竭最有效的方法还没有达成共识。本研究旨在评估 HFrEF 患者最有效的药物治疗组合:我们系统检索了 Medline、Embase 和 CENTRAL(截至 2022 年 2 月),以纳入评估药物治疗对确诊为 HFrEF(定义为左心室射血分数小于 45%)的成人(≥ 18 岁)疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。研究结果包括全因死亡、心血管(CV)死亡和心衰住院(HHF)。采用频数主义框架模型进行随机网络荟萃分析,计算汇集风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI),并对治疗方法进行排序:我们纳入了49项RCT,涉及90529名HFrEF患者。在降低全因死亡率方面,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、β-受体阻滞剂(BB)、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的联合治疗最为有效(RR,0.46;95% CI,0.32-0.66)。对于冠心病死亡,ACEI、BB、MRA 和 Vericiguat 的组合显示出最高的疗效(RR,0.34;95% CI,0.12-0.90)。在降低HHF方面,ACEI、BB、MRA和SGLT2i的组合以及ACEI、BB、MRA和伊伐布雷定的组合同样最为有效(RR均为0.27;95% CI为0.18-0.39):这项研究提供了强有力的证据,支持在 HFrEF 治疗中使用联合疗法,较新的药物在加入既定的指导性药物治疗后可带来更多益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
480
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the heart and circulatory system, as well as related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and controlled trials.
期刊最新文献
The most effective combination of pharmacological therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Effect of Tricin on cardiomyocyte damage caused by diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM). High hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio reduces adverse events in patients with pacemaker implantation. The predictive value of pan-immune inflammatory index for early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cryoablation. Comparing HeartModelAI and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left ventricular volume and function evaluation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1