The use of the psoas-to-lumbar vertebrae index and modified frailty index in predicting postoperative complications in degenerative spine surgery: can sarcopenia or frailty be underestimated?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08567-1
Alberto Ruffilli, Marco Manzetti, Giovanni Viroli, Matteo Traversari, Marco Ialuna, Manuele Morandi Guaitoli, Alessandro Cargeli, Cesare Faldini
{"title":"The use of the psoas-to-lumbar vertebrae index and modified frailty index in predicting postoperative complications in degenerative spine surgery: can sarcopenia or frailty be underestimated?","authors":"Alberto Ruffilli, Marco Manzetti, Giovanni Viroli, Matteo Traversari, Marco Ialuna, Manuele Morandi Guaitoli, Alessandro Cargeli, Cesare Faldini","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08567-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Degenerative spine disease (DSD) is increasingly prevalent due to aging populations, leading to higher surgical interventions and associated complications. This necessitates a comprehensive preoperative assessment, evaluating frailty through tools such as the modified Frailty Index 5 and modified Frailty Index 11 (mFI-5 and mFI-11). Despite the utility of mFI-5 and mFI-11 in predicting postoperative complications, these indices do not account for sarcopenia, a syndrome related to but distinct from frailty, which is associated with higher complication rates. This paper aims to retrospectively evaluate the influence of sarcopenia and frailty on postoperative adverse events in a cohort of patients who underwent posterior spine fusion for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 286 patients who underwent posterior lumbar spine fusion for DSD was conducted. Frailty was measured using mFI-5 and mFI-11, while sarcopenia was assessed through Psoas to Lumbar Vertebral Index (PLVI) on magnetic resonance images. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications within 30 days. Statistical analysis involved univariate and multivariate models to determine the predictors of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher frailty scores were significantly associated with increased postoperative complications (p < .05). However, sarcopenia showed no significant correlation with postoperative complications rates, except for pneumological complications (p = .031). Multivariate analysis confirmed frailty as a strong independent predictor of postoperative complications, while sarcopenia had limited impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty is a robust predictor of postoperative complications in DSD surgeries, while sarcopenia, appears to play a lesser role. The findings suggest that frailty alone provide a more comprehensive assessment of risk than sarcopenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08567-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Degenerative spine disease (DSD) is increasingly prevalent due to aging populations, leading to higher surgical interventions and associated complications. This necessitates a comprehensive preoperative assessment, evaluating frailty through tools such as the modified Frailty Index 5 and modified Frailty Index 11 (mFI-5 and mFI-11). Despite the utility of mFI-5 and mFI-11 in predicting postoperative complications, these indices do not account for sarcopenia, a syndrome related to but distinct from frailty, which is associated with higher complication rates. This paper aims to retrospectively evaluate the influence of sarcopenia and frailty on postoperative adverse events in a cohort of patients who underwent posterior spine fusion for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.

Methods: A retrospective review of 286 patients who underwent posterior lumbar spine fusion for DSD was conducted. Frailty was measured using mFI-5 and mFI-11, while sarcopenia was assessed through Psoas to Lumbar Vertebral Index (PLVI) on magnetic resonance images. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications within 30 days. Statistical analysis involved univariate and multivariate models to determine the predictors of complications.

Results: Higher frailty scores were significantly associated with increased postoperative complications (p < .05). However, sarcopenia showed no significant correlation with postoperative complications rates, except for pneumological complications (p = .031). Multivariate analysis confirmed frailty as a strong independent predictor of postoperative complications, while sarcopenia had limited impact.

Conclusion: Frailty is a robust predictor of postoperative complications in DSD surgeries, while sarcopenia, appears to play a lesser role. The findings suggest that frailty alone provide a more comprehensive assessment of risk than sarcopenia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用腰肌-腰椎指数和改良虚弱指数预测退行性脊柱手术的术后并发症:肌肉疏松症或虚弱会被低估吗?
目的:由于人口老龄化,脊柱退行性疾病(DSD)越来越普遍,导致手术干预和相关并发症增加。因此有必要进行全面的术前评估,通过改良虚弱指数 5 和改良虚弱指数 11(mFI-5 和 mFI-11)等工具评估虚弱程度。尽管 mFI-5 和 mFI-11 在预测术后并发症方面很有用,但这些指数并没有考虑到肌少症,而肌少症是一种与虚弱相关但又不同于虚弱的综合征,与较高的并发症发生率相关。本文旨在回顾性评估一组因腰椎退行性疾病接受脊柱后路融合术的患者中,肌肉疏松症和虚弱对术后不良事件的影响:对286名接受后路腰椎融合术治疗DSD的患者进行了回顾性研究。采用 mFI-5 和 mFI-11 测量虚弱程度,并通过磁共振图像上的腰椎至腰椎指数(PLVI)评估肌肉疏松症。主要结果包括 30 天内的术后并发症。统计分析包括单变量和多变量模型,以确定并发症的预测因素:结果:体弱评分越高,术后并发症越多(P 结论:体弱是术后并发症的可靠预测因素:虚弱是预测 DSD 手术术后并发症的重要因素,而肌肉疏松症似乎作用较小。研究结果表明,与肌肉疏松症相比,体弱本身能提供更全面的风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Comparison of fusion rate, radiologic and clinical outcome between CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 bioactive glass-ceramics 7 (BGS-7) spacer and allograft spacer with iliac bone graft in multilevel ACDF. Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and establishment of the minimal clinicallyimportant change score of the European Portuguese Core Outcome Measures Index in patients with cervical degenerative spine disease. Effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty combined with percutaneous microwave ablation on pain and clinical outcome in patients with spinal metastases. Letter to the editor concerning "association between skin ultrasound parameters and revision surgery after posterior spinal fusion" by E. Chiapparelli, et al. (Eur Spine J [2024]: doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08319-1). Assessing bone quality in hounsfield units using computed tomography: what value should be used to classify bone as normal or osteoporotic?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1