Better end-of-life care in surgical patients: Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey - a qualitative analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1136/spcare-2024-004873
Christina Shabet, C Ann Vitous, Emily Evans, Sydney Edwards, Sarah E Bradley, Ashley Duby, Pasithorn A Suwanabol
{"title":"Better end-of-life care in surgical patients: Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey - a qualitative analysis.","authors":"Christina Shabet, C Ann Vitous, Emily Evans, Sydney Edwards, Sarah E Bradley, Ashley Duby, Pasithorn A Suwanabol","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-004873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>End-of-life care among surgical patients is largely understudied and far fewer studies examine such care from the family perspective. To identify potential opportunities for improvement, we explored responses of family members of veterans who died following surgery using the Veterans Affairs (VAs) Bereaved Family Survey (BFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined data from the BFS open-text responses to explore insights into surgical patient's end-of-life care. Data were analysed iteratively using qualitative content analysis and clustered into domains based on content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 936 open-text responses to the BFS for all decedents who underwent any high-risk surgical procedure across 124 VA medical centres from 2010 to 2019. This report focused on the following domains: patient needs, family/caregiver needs, clinical teams/personnel characteristics and facility/organisational characteristics. Key themes within patient needs included concerns about pain management, preservation of patient dignity and spiritual support. Within the family/caregiver domain, key themes included enhanced communication needs, assistance with logistics and displays of gratitude for the patient's military service. The clinical team's domain included the key themes of professionalism concerns and understaffing. Finally, key themes identified within the facility/organisation domain were the need for more robust support services and discomfort with the physical space.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Narratives from the family perspective provide valuable insight into end-of-life care among surgical patients. Our data demonstrate the critical need for preserving patient dignity and improved communication, which emphasises family involvement and shared decision-making. In addition, hospital systems can optimise nurse-to-patient ratios and intentionally design physical spaces to help improve end-of-life care for surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-004873","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: End-of-life care among surgical patients is largely understudied and far fewer studies examine such care from the family perspective. To identify potential opportunities for improvement, we explored responses of family members of veterans who died following surgery using the Veterans Affairs (VAs) Bereaved Family Survey (BFS).

Methods: We examined data from the BFS open-text responses to explore insights into surgical patient's end-of-life care. Data were analysed iteratively using qualitative content analysis and clustered into domains based on content.

Results: We evaluated 936 open-text responses to the BFS for all decedents who underwent any high-risk surgical procedure across 124 VA medical centres from 2010 to 2019. This report focused on the following domains: patient needs, family/caregiver needs, clinical teams/personnel characteristics and facility/organisational characteristics. Key themes within patient needs included concerns about pain management, preservation of patient dignity and spiritual support. Within the family/caregiver domain, key themes included enhanced communication needs, assistance with logistics and displays of gratitude for the patient's military service. The clinical team's domain included the key themes of professionalism concerns and understaffing. Finally, key themes identified within the facility/organisation domain were the need for more robust support services and discomfort with the physical space.

Conclusions: Narratives from the family perspective provide valuable insight into end-of-life care among surgical patients. Our data demonstrate the critical need for preserving patient dignity and improved communication, which emphasises family involvement and shared decision-making. In addition, hospital systems can optimise nurse-to-patient ratios and intentionally design physical spaces to help improve end-of-life care for surgical patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为手术患者提供更好的临终关怀:退伍军人事务遗属调查--定性分析。
背景:手术患者的临终关怀大多未得到充分研究,而从家属角度研究此类护理的研究更是少之又少。为了确定潜在的改进机会,我们利用退伍军人事务局(VAs)的遗属调查(BFS),对手术后死亡的退伍军人家属的回答进行了研究:我们研究了 BFS 开放文本回复中的数据,以探索对手术患者临终关怀的见解。我们使用定性内容分析法对数据进行了反复分析,并根据内容对数据进行了分类:我们评估了 2010 年至 2019 年期间 124 个退伍军人事务部医疗中心所有接受任何高风险外科手术的死者的 936 份 BFS 开放文本回复。本报告重点关注以下领域:患者需求、家属/护理人员需求、临床团队/人员特征以及设施/组织特征。患者需求的关键主题包括对疼痛管理、维护患者尊严和精神支持的关注。在家属/护理人员领域,关键主题包括加强沟通需求、后勤协助以及对患者服兵役表示感谢。临床团队领域的关键主题包括专业性问题和人手不足。最后,设施/组织领域的关键主题是需要更强大的支持服务以及对物理空间的不适应:从家属角度的叙述为外科手术患者的临终关怀提供了宝贵的见解。我们的数据表明,维护患者尊严和改善沟通至关重要,这强调了家属的参与和共同决策。此外,医院系统可以优化护士与患者的比例,并有意识地设计物理空间,以帮助改善手术患者的临终关怀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
期刊最新文献
Better end-of-life care in surgical patients: Veterans Affairs Bereaved Family Survey - a qualitative analysis. Airflow rates and breathlessness recovery from submaximal exercise in healthy adults: prospective, randomised, cross-over study. Oregon Death with Dignity Act access: 25 year analysis. Spiritual conversation model for patients and loved ones in palliative care: a validation study. Symptom assessment in the dying: family members versus healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1