Breakthroughs and insights: A comprehensive review of yellow fever vaccine breakthrough infection across 8 decades

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126423
Felicity J. Coulter , William B. Messer
{"title":"Breakthroughs and insights: A comprehensive review of yellow fever vaccine breakthrough infection across 8 decades","authors":"Felicity J. Coulter ,&nbsp;William B. Messer","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The yellow fever vaccine 17D is one of the most successful live-attenuated vaccines ever developed, controlling mosquito-borne yellow fever virus and yellow fever disease worldwide. Introduced in 1937, 17D never underwent rigorous phase III clinical trials to evaluate safety or efficacy, and while protection in the field was quickly established, no prospective evaluation of vaccine efficacy has ever been conducted. One important measure of vaccine efficacy is breakthrough infection resulting from vaccine failure. Yellow fever breakthrough infection was previously formally evaluated in a policy-changing report conducted by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in 2015 but has not been reviewed since despite several recent outbreaks in South America and Africa. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a literature search and reviewed 19 papers documenting breakthrough yellow fever infection between 1944 and 2023. There were up to 7793 suspected and up to 773 confirmed breakthrough cases reported in the literature, including thirteen cohort studies, four case reports, and two case series, which we summarize, evaluate the approaches used, and identify strengths and weakness. This review provides an important and much needed update on the topic of yellow fever breakthrough infection, drawing from recent outbreaks, highlighting limitations, and suggesting future approaches to further advance the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 126423"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24011058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The yellow fever vaccine 17D is one of the most successful live-attenuated vaccines ever developed, controlling mosquito-borne yellow fever virus and yellow fever disease worldwide. Introduced in 1937, 17D never underwent rigorous phase III clinical trials to evaluate safety or efficacy, and while protection in the field was quickly established, no prospective evaluation of vaccine efficacy has ever been conducted. One important measure of vaccine efficacy is breakthrough infection resulting from vaccine failure. Yellow fever breakthrough infection was previously formally evaluated in a policy-changing report conducted by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices in 2015 but has not been reviewed since despite several recent outbreaks in South America and Africa. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a literature search and reviewed 19 papers documenting breakthrough yellow fever infection between 1944 and 2023. There were up to 7793 suspected and up to 773 confirmed breakthrough cases reported in the literature, including thirteen cohort studies, four case reports, and two case series, which we summarize, evaluate the approaches used, and identify strengths and weakness. This review provides an important and much needed update on the topic of yellow fever breakthrough infection, drawing from recent outbreaks, highlighting limitations, and suggesting future approaches to further advance the field.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
突破与见解:全面回顾八十年来黄热病疫苗的突破性感染。
黄热病疫苗 17D 是迄今为止开发的最成功的减毒活疫苗之一,可在全球范围内控制由蚊子传播的黄热病病毒和黄热病。17D 于 1937 年推出,但从未进行过严格的 III 期临床试验来评估其安全性或有效性,虽然很快就在当地建立了保护作用,但从未对疫苗的有效性进行过前瞻性评估。疫苗效果的一个重要衡量标准是疫苗失效导致的突破性感染。黄热病突破性感染曾在 2015 年由免疫实践咨询委员会进行的一份改变政策的报告中进行过正式评估,但此后尽管最近在南美和非洲爆发了几次疫情,却再未进行过审查。为了填补这一知识空白,我们进行了文献检索,并查阅了 19 篇记录 1944 年至 2023 年期间黄热病突破性感染的论文。文献中报告了多达 7793 例疑似和 773 例确诊突破性感染病例,其中包括 13 项队列研究、4 项病例报告和 2 项系列病例,我们对这些研究进行了总结,对所用方法进行了评估,并找出了优缺点。本综述就黄热病突破性感染这一主题提供了重要且亟需的最新信息,借鉴了近期的疫情,强调了局限性,并提出了进一步推动该领域发展的未来方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
期刊最新文献
The risk of pregnancy-related adverse outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination: Propensity score-matched analysis with influenza vaccination Poor vaccine responders mask the true trend in vaccine effectiveness against progression to severe disease Associations between family planning, healthcare access, and female education and vaccination among under-immunized children Herpes zoster vaccination among Medicare beneficiaries with and without prescription drug coverage Report of a SPEAC webinar 22 september 2023: Sensorineural hearing loss, lassa virus disease and vaccines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1