{"title":"The influence of applying skin temperature corrections to gas exchange models on air-sea oxygen flux estimates","authors":"Bo Yang , Chris Langdon","doi":"10.1016/j.pocean.2024.103383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The skin of the ocean is often slightly cooler than the surface mixed layer due to net surface heat loss (cool skin effect), and sometimes slightly warmer in areas with extreme solar radiation (warm layer effect). In previous work (<span><span>Yang et al., 2022</span></span>), with the skin temperature correction term (ΔT) derived from the fifth generation European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis (ERA5) and oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>) data from three Argo profiling floats, we showed that skin temperature correction is critical for air-sea O<sub>2</sub> flux calculation. In this work, we applied the same method to the World Ocean Atlas 2018 (WOA2018) dataset with two widely used air-sea gas exchange models (an empirically derived quadratic bulk flux model W14, and a mechanistic bubble-mediated model E19), to evaluate the influence of skin temperature correction on large-scale air-sea O<sub>2</sub> flux estimate. To avoid the influence of sea ice on air-sea gas exchange (and possibly on the ERA5 reanalysis), we limited our analysis between 50°S and 50°N. The result revealed that for both W14 and E19 models the skin temperature correction lowered annual sea-to-air O<sub>2</sub> flux between 50°S and 50°N by 25 % for the E19 model and by 22 % for the W14 model. Larger ΔT (further from zero), higher temperature, higher wind speed, and larger O<sub>2</sub> concentration difference across the air-sea interface led to larger difference in O<sub>2</sub> fluxes calculated with and without the skin temperature correction. With the E19 model, using the ERA5-based ΔT for areas between 50°S and 50°N and a fixed ΔT of −0.17 K for high latitude areas (50°N-90°N and 50°S-90°S), we made an estimate of O<sub>2</sub>-based global air-to-sea carbon flux of 3.84 Pg C yr<sup>−1</sup> (using O<sub>2</sub> to C ratio of 1.45 from <span><span>Hedges et al., 2002</span></span>), which was comparable to other latest estimates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20620,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Oceanography","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 103383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Oceanography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079661124001897","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The skin of the ocean is often slightly cooler than the surface mixed layer due to net surface heat loss (cool skin effect), and sometimes slightly warmer in areas with extreme solar radiation (warm layer effect). In previous work (Yang et al., 2022), with the skin temperature correction term (ΔT) derived from the fifth generation European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis (ERA5) and oxygen (O2) data from three Argo profiling floats, we showed that skin temperature correction is critical for air-sea O2 flux calculation. In this work, we applied the same method to the World Ocean Atlas 2018 (WOA2018) dataset with two widely used air-sea gas exchange models (an empirically derived quadratic bulk flux model W14, and a mechanistic bubble-mediated model E19), to evaluate the influence of skin temperature correction on large-scale air-sea O2 flux estimate. To avoid the influence of sea ice on air-sea gas exchange (and possibly on the ERA5 reanalysis), we limited our analysis between 50°S and 50°N. The result revealed that for both W14 and E19 models the skin temperature correction lowered annual sea-to-air O2 flux between 50°S and 50°N by 25 % for the E19 model and by 22 % for the W14 model. Larger ΔT (further from zero), higher temperature, higher wind speed, and larger O2 concentration difference across the air-sea interface led to larger difference in O2 fluxes calculated with and without the skin temperature correction. With the E19 model, using the ERA5-based ΔT for areas between 50°S and 50°N and a fixed ΔT of −0.17 K for high latitude areas (50°N-90°N and 50°S-90°S), we made an estimate of O2-based global air-to-sea carbon flux of 3.84 Pg C yr−1 (using O2 to C ratio of 1.45 from Hedges et al., 2002), which was comparable to other latest estimates.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Oceanography publishes the longer, more comprehensive papers that most oceanographers feel are necessary, on occasion, to do justice to their work. Contributions are generally either a review of an aspect of oceanography or a treatise on an expanding oceanographic subject. The articles cover the entire spectrum of disciplines within the science of oceanography. Occasionally volumes are devoted to collections of papers and conference proceedings of exceptional interest. Essential reading for all oceanographers.