Xiaohong Yu, Haiyan Xu, Jun Yin, Qiancheng Ma, Farina Khan
{"title":"Achieving China's CO<sub>2</sub> reduction targets: Insights from a hybrid PPA-PPR forecasting model.","authors":"Xiaohong Yu, Haiyan Xu, Jun Yin, Qiancheng Ma, Farina Khan","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>China is the largest carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emitter and has formulated CO<sub>2</sub> emission peak and carbon-neutral plans. Studies on CO<sub>2</sub> emission volume and CO<sub>2</sub> emission intensity (CEI) indicate a growing interest in related fields. The purpose of this research is to improve the performance and reliability of the model for forecasting CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and judging whether to achieve China's CO<sub>2</sub> reduction targets under business-as-usual scenarios. We originally applied a novel hybrid model combining the projection pursuit regression (PPR) model and parasitism-predation optimization algorithm (PPA) (PPA-PPR) to forecast the CO2 emissions from 2022 to 2035, with the time series' CO2 emissions data from 1965 to 2017 and compare with various machine learnings. From the studied results, we can conclude that the hybrid PPA-PPR has better stability and accuracy than BPNN, RF, SVM, GM, TDGM, and LSTM models. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the verification set data is only 1.19%, and the MAPE of forecasting set data from 2018 to 2021 is 1.44, which obviously outperforms the BPNN, RF, SVM, GM, TDGM, and LSTM models. The second finding is that if China continues to develop in its present trend, it can't implement the CO<sub>2</sub> emission peak and reduction CEI target by over 65% by 2030. The limitation of this research is that we don't decompose the time series data into intrinsic modes to study the possibility of improving the model performances.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"372 ","pages":"123409"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
China is the largest carbon dioxide (CO2) emitter and has formulated CO2 emission peak and carbon-neutral plans. Studies on CO2 emission volume and CO2 emission intensity (CEI) indicate a growing interest in related fields. The purpose of this research is to improve the performance and reliability of the model for forecasting CO2 emissions and judging whether to achieve China's CO2 reduction targets under business-as-usual scenarios. We originally applied a novel hybrid model combining the projection pursuit regression (PPR) model and parasitism-predation optimization algorithm (PPA) (PPA-PPR) to forecast the CO2 emissions from 2022 to 2035, with the time series' CO2 emissions data from 1965 to 2017 and compare with various machine learnings. From the studied results, we can conclude that the hybrid PPA-PPR has better stability and accuracy than BPNN, RF, SVM, GM, TDGM, and LSTM models. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the verification set data is only 1.19%, and the MAPE of forecasting set data from 2018 to 2021 is 1.44, which obviously outperforms the BPNN, RF, SVM, GM, TDGM, and LSTM models. The second finding is that if China continues to develop in its present trend, it can't implement the CO2 emission peak and reduction CEI target by over 65% by 2030. The limitation of this research is that we don't decompose the time series data into intrinsic modes to study the possibility of improving the model performances.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.