Cognitive Impairment is Common and Unrecognized in Vascular Surgery Patients

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.003
Emily J. Draper , Tam B. Nguyen , Amin A. Mirzaie , Dan Neal , Salvatore T. Scali , Thomas S. Huber , Scott A. Berceli , Gilbert R. Upchurch Jr. , Samir K. Shah
{"title":"Cognitive Impairment is Common and Unrecognized in Vascular Surgery Patients","authors":"Emily J. Draper ,&nbsp;Tam B. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Amin A. Mirzaie ,&nbsp;Dan Neal ,&nbsp;Salvatore T. Scali ,&nbsp;Thomas S. Huber ,&nbsp;Scott A. Berceli ,&nbsp;Gilbert R. Upchurch Jr. ,&nbsp;Samir K. Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients’ capacities to understand and act upon healthcare information is crucial to decision-making and high-quality care. Cognitive impairment (CI) has been associated with adverse outcomes across a range of diseases and surgeries. Despite the importance of CI, there is little to no information on its prevalence and severity in vascular surgery patients in the United States. We therefore conducted a prospective observational study to better characterize the prevalence and severity of CI in a contemporary vascular surgery practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We enrolled 111 outpatients attending a vascular surgery clinic using pragmatic consecutive sampling. Patients were excluded if they had a previous diagnosis of blindness, deafness, or dementia. Subjects completed a demographic survey and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which was administered by a trained proctor. Chart review was used to assess comorbidities. The MoCA is a validated tool consisting of tasks such as clock drawing for assessing CI. It has a lower educational bias and higher sensitivity for detecting mild impairment compared to other examinations. The MoCA is scored from 0–30 based on an objective grading system. Scores between 0–9, 10–17, 18–25, and 26–30 indicate severe, moderate, mild, and no CI, respectively. Statistical analysis, including multivariable modeling, was performed using SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 163 patients, our analysis included 111 consecutive vascular patients who completed the MoCA. The average age of the entire cohort was 64.1 years, and 58.6% were male. The majority of the patients in the study were White (80.1%). The mean MoCA score of the entire cohort was 22.6 (mild CI). Of all subjects, 77% had CI: 68% with mild and 9% with moderate CI. Hypertension (<em>P</em> = 0.024), congestive heart failure (CHF) (<em>P</em> = 0.028), fewer years of education (<em>P</em> = 0.032), and Medicaid enrollment (<em>P</em> = 0.046) all had significant univariate associations with CI. There was no statistically significant difference between age (<em>P</em> = 0.11) or the primary vascular diagnosis disease for which the patient sought treatment and CI (<em>P</em> = 0.49). Multivariable models demonstrated that only CHF (odds ratio 3.8, <em>P</em> = 0.046) was statistically significantly associated with risk of CI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this first-time prospective study of the entire spectrum of vascular patients in the United States, we found that nearly 4 of every 5 vascular surgery patients have undiagnosed CI. Furthermore, we found that having CHF was associated with a higher likelihood of CI. Given the implications on consent, decision-making, and postoperative care, future work should focus on enrollment of a larger cohort along with an examination of the impact of CI on mortality, length of stay, and other outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"111 ","pages":"Pages 187-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624006915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients’ capacities to understand and act upon healthcare information is crucial to decision-making and high-quality care. Cognitive impairment (CI) has been associated with adverse outcomes across a range of diseases and surgeries. Despite the importance of CI, there is little to no information on its prevalence and severity in vascular surgery patients in the United States. We therefore conducted a prospective observational study to better characterize the prevalence and severity of CI in a contemporary vascular surgery practice.

Methods

We enrolled 111 outpatients attending a vascular surgery clinic using pragmatic consecutive sampling. Patients were excluded if they had a previous diagnosis of blindness, deafness, or dementia. Subjects completed a demographic survey and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), which was administered by a trained proctor. Chart review was used to assess comorbidities. The MoCA is a validated tool consisting of tasks such as clock drawing for assessing CI. It has a lower educational bias and higher sensitivity for detecting mild impairment compared to other examinations. The MoCA is scored from 0–30 based on an objective grading system. Scores between 0–9, 10–17, 18–25, and 26–30 indicate severe, moderate, mild, and no CI, respectively. Statistical analysis, including multivariable modeling, was performed using SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

Of 163 patients, our analysis included 111 consecutive vascular patients who completed the MoCA. The average age of the entire cohort was 64.1 years, and 58.6% were male. The majority of the patients in the study were White (80.1%). The mean MoCA score of the entire cohort was 22.6 (mild CI). Of all subjects, 77% had CI: 68% with mild and 9% with moderate CI. Hypertension (P = 0.024), congestive heart failure (CHF) (P = 0.028), fewer years of education (P = 0.032), and Medicaid enrollment (P = 0.046) all had significant univariate associations with CI. There was no statistically significant difference between age (P = 0.11) or the primary vascular diagnosis disease for which the patient sought treatment and CI (P = 0.49). Multivariable models demonstrated that only CHF (odds ratio 3.8, P = 0.046) was statistically significantly associated with risk of CI.

Conclusions

In this first-time prospective study of the entire spectrum of vascular patients in the United States, we found that nearly 4 of every 5 vascular surgery patients have undiagnosed CI. Furthermore, we found that having CHF was associated with a higher likelihood of CI. Given the implications on consent, decision-making, and postoperative care, future work should focus on enrollment of a larger cohort along with an examination of the impact of CI on mortality, length of stay, and other outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知障碍在血管外科手术患者中很常见,但却未被认识到。
目的:患者理解医疗信息并据此采取行动的能力对决策和高质量的医疗服务至关重要。认知障碍(CI)与一系列疾病和手术的不良后果有关。尽管 CI 很重要,但在美国,关于其在血管外科患者中的流行率和严重程度的信息却几乎没有。因此,我们开展了一项前瞻性观察研究,以更好地描述当代血管外科实践中 CI 的流行率和严重程度:方法:我们采用实用连续抽样法招募了 111 名血管外科门诊患者。曾被诊断为失明、失聪或痴呆的患者将被排除在外。受试者完成了一项人口统计学调查和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA),该评估由一名经过培训的监考人员进行。病历审查用于评估合并症。MoCA 是一种经过验证的工具,包括绘制时钟等任务,用于评估 CI。与其他检查相比,它的教育偏差较小,检测轻度损伤的灵敏度较高。MoCA 的评分范围为 0-30 分,采用客观的评分系统。0-9、10-17、18-25 和 26-30 分分别表示重度、中度、轻度和无 CI。统计分析(包括多变量模型)使用 SAS 进行:在 163 名患者中,我们的分析包括 111 名连续完成 MoCA 的血管性患者。整个群体的平均年龄为 64.1 岁,58.6% 为男性。研究中的大多数患者为白人(80.1%)。整个群体的平均 MoCA 得分为 22.6(轻度 CI)。所有受试者中有 77% 患有 CI:68% 患有轻度 CI,9% 患有中度 CI。高血压(p=.024)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)(p=.028)、受教育年限较少(p=.032)和医疗补助(Medicaid)登记(p=.046)均与 CI 存在显著的单变量关联。年龄(p=.11)或患者寻求治疗的主要血管诊断疾病与 CI(p=.49)之间没有明显的统计学差异。多变量模型显示,只有 CHF(OR 3.8,p=.046)与 CI 风险有明显的统计学相关性:在这项首次对美国所有血管病患进行的前瞻性研究中,我们发现每 5 位血管手术患者中就有近 4 位存在未确诊的认知障碍。此外,我们还发现患有慢性心力衰竭的患者发生认知障碍的可能性更高。考虑到这对同意、决策和术后护理的影响,未来的工作重点应该是招募更大规模的人群,同时研究 CI 对死亡率、住院时间和其他结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Cognitive Impairment is Common and Unrecognized in Vascular Surgery Patients Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Hostile Artery Access: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study Open Revascularization for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia is Associated with Increased Morbidity and Mortality when Compared to Endovascular Intervention Pancreaticoduodenal Artery Aneurysm in a Patient with Celiac Artery Atresia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1