Jacopo Bonet, Silvia Guiducci, Giulia Res, Sabrina Brigadoi, Sarbattama Sen, Paolo Montaldo, Elena Priante, Nicola Santoro, Daniele Trevisanuto, Eugenio Baraldi, Chiara Dalla Man, Alfonso Galderisi
{"title":"Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Infants Born Very Preterm: Evidence for Accuracy in Neonatal Intensive Care.","authors":"Jacopo Bonet, Silvia Guiducci, Giulia Res, Sabrina Brigadoi, Sarbattama Sen, Paolo Montaldo, Elena Priante, Nicola Santoro, Daniele Trevisanuto, Eugenio Baraldi, Chiara Dalla Man, Alfonso Galderisi","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of a device for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among infants born preterm admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We analyzed paired CGM sensor glucose (SG) and point-of-care blood glucose (BG) measurements collected in infants born at ≤32 weeks of gestation or with a birth weight ≤1500 g. CGM was initiated within 48 hours from birth and maintained for 5 days. BG was performed every 12 hours and used to calibrate the sensor. Measures of CGM accuracy were computed from SG and BG pairs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 501 SG-BG paired measurements from 51 infants (age 30.5 weeks [IQR 29.0-31.0 weeks], birth weight 1400 g [IQR 1100-1500 g] with at least 24 hours of CGM data. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between SG and point-of-care BG measures was 7.1% [IQR 5.6-9.3], corresponding to a difference of -5.6 mg/dL [95% CI -25 to +14 mg/dl]. The median sensor use was 96 hours [IQR 72-120] with 2.0 [IQR 1.7-2.4] calibrations per day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accuracy of SG measurements compared with BG measurements appears to be acceptable in a clinical study setting, with a negligible difference between SG and BG. Our data suggest that SG use may be clinically acceptable when the sensor is regularly calibrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"114416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114416","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of a device for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among infants born preterm admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.
Study design: We analyzed paired CGM sensor glucose (SG) and point-of-care blood glucose (BG) measurements collected in infants born at ≤32 weeks of gestation or with a birth weight ≤1500 g. CGM was initiated within 48 hours from birth and maintained for 5 days. BG was performed every 12 hours and used to calibrate the sensor. Measures of CGM accuracy were computed from SG and BG pairs.
Results: We included 501 SG-BG paired measurements from 51 infants (age 30.5 weeks [IQR 29.0-31.0 weeks], birth weight 1400 g [IQR 1100-1500 g] with at least 24 hours of CGM data. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between SG and point-of-care BG measures was 7.1% [IQR 5.6-9.3], corresponding to a difference of -5.6 mg/dL [95% CI -25 to +14 mg/dl]. The median sensor use was 96 hours [IQR 72-120] with 2.0 [IQR 1.7-2.4] calibrations per day.
Conclusions: Accuracy of SG measurements compared with BG measurements appears to be acceptable in a clinical study setting, with a negligible difference between SG and BG. Our data suggest that SG use may be clinically acceptable when the sensor is regularly calibrated.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy.
Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to:
General Pediatrics
Pediatric Subspecialties
Adolescent Medicine
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Critical Care Medicine
Developmental-Behavioral Medicine
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Diseases
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Genetics
Ethics
Health Service Research
Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.