{"title":"The Post-Kelly Strategy: A Negative Feedback Model of Reallocating Ant Foragers.","authors":"Kun Wei, Jiecong Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11538-024-01383-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In ant foraging, the manner of group-mass recruitment demonstrates remarkable adaptability between tandem running and mass recruitment. In contrast to tandem running, where a leader recruits only one worker, the first phase of group-mass recruitment is characterized by strong invitations from leaders that result in a large group of recruits leaving the nest together in a rush, thereby accelerating the process of recruiting towards discovered resources. Furthermore, unlike sole mass recruitment, the influence of leaders during this first phase enhances the accuracy of information about food qualities and ensures a more rational allocation of recruits compared to simply following a dominant pheromone trail. In this study, we propose a model that integrates the Kelly criterion for the first phase of group-mass recruitment, followed by a post-Kelly strategy incorporating a delayed Pólya urn with two stages for the second phase of group-mass recruitment. The analytical process and simulation demonstrate that the Kelly criterion aims to maximize recruitment intensity during the initial foraging phase, employing crowd tactics to capture all available food sources and enhance competitiveness with other food-exploiting species. On the other hand, the post-Kelly strategy elucidates how the crowding negative feedback mitigates congestion resulting from overexploitation and improves overall efficiency in food exploitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9372,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","volume":"87 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Mathematical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-024-01383-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In ant foraging, the manner of group-mass recruitment demonstrates remarkable adaptability between tandem running and mass recruitment. In contrast to tandem running, where a leader recruits only one worker, the first phase of group-mass recruitment is characterized by strong invitations from leaders that result in a large group of recruits leaving the nest together in a rush, thereby accelerating the process of recruiting towards discovered resources. Furthermore, unlike sole mass recruitment, the influence of leaders during this first phase enhances the accuracy of information about food qualities and ensures a more rational allocation of recruits compared to simply following a dominant pheromone trail. In this study, we propose a model that integrates the Kelly criterion for the first phase of group-mass recruitment, followed by a post-Kelly strategy incorporating a delayed Pólya urn with two stages for the second phase of group-mass recruitment. The analytical process and simulation demonstrate that the Kelly criterion aims to maximize recruitment intensity during the initial foraging phase, employing crowd tactics to capture all available food sources and enhance competitiveness with other food-exploiting species. On the other hand, the post-Kelly strategy elucidates how the crowding negative feedback mitigates congestion resulting from overexploitation and improves overall efficiency in food exploitation.
期刊介绍:
The Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, the official journal of the Society for Mathematical Biology, disseminates original research findings and other information relevant to the interface of biology and the mathematical sciences. Contributions should have relevance to both fields. In order to accommodate the broad scope of new developments, the journal accepts a variety of contributions, including:
Original research articles focused on new biological insights gained with the help of tools from the mathematical sciences or new mathematical tools and methods with demonstrated applicability to biological investigations
Research in mathematical biology education
Reviews
Commentaries
Perspectives, and contributions that discuss issues important to the profession
All contributions are peer-reviewed.