Impact of healthy pregnancy and lifestyle in mothers on developmental delay in their offspring: a strength-based analysis of a longitudinal study among indigenous children in Australia.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06990-2
Md Irteja Islam, Thomas Stubbs, Tuguy Esgin, Alexandra Martiniuk
{"title":"Impact of healthy pregnancy and lifestyle in mothers on developmental delay in their offspring: a strength-based analysis of a longitudinal study among indigenous children in Australia.","authors":"Md Irteja Islam, Thomas Stubbs, Tuguy Esgin, Alexandra Martiniuk","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06990-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Extensive literature has investigated the prenatal risk factors of developmental delay in children, with evidence highlighting the impact of prenatal health, mental health, and behavioural factors. While a deficit discourse has underscored Indigenous health research and policies, strengths-based approaches provide an opportunity to reframe this discourse, to illustrate and celebrate the strength and resilience of Australian Indigenous families. As such, this study aimed to identify the protective impact of healthy pregnancy and lifestyle in mothers on developmental delay in Indigenous Australian children; and whether it varies by child birthweight adjusted for gestational age. Further, we also tested whether child birthweight for adjusted gestational age mediates the association between a healthy pregnancy and lifestyle in mothers and developmental delay in their Indigenous offspring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Strength-based analysis was conducted using data from 8 longitudinal waves of LSIC study in Australia. Random-effect models were used to longitudinally measure the impact of maternal healthy pregnancy and lifestyle on developmental delays in their children between 2008 and 2018. A composite score (ranging from 0 to 3, score = 3 refers to most healthy pregnancy) was created for a healthy pregnancy and lifestyle variable using three criteria - (1) a lack of medical conditions, (2) no substance use including smoking/alcohol/illicit drugs, and (3) intake of iron/folic acid during pregnancy. All models were adjusted for potential covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 780 mother-child dyads analysed, 65.4% of mothers reported healthy pregnancy and lifestyle; while 73.5% of children born with a recommended appropriate birthweight adjusted for gestational age, and 91.4% reported no developmental delays. In children born in the recommended range of appropriate birthweight adjusted for gestational age, healthy pregnancy in mothers (most healthy, aOR: 4.76, 95% CI: 1.12-20.18; and 2nd most healthy, aOR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.09-14.83) was protective against development delay compared to maternal unhealthy pregnancy. Living in remote areas (vs. major city, and regional) was also found to be protective against developmental delay in those who were born within the recommended range of birthweight adjusted for gestational age. Further, the current study found that child birthweight for adjusted gestational age does not have any mediating effect on the association between healthy pregnancy in mothers and developmental delay in their children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This strengths-based study suggests healthy pregnancy in mothers should be advocated to prevent developmental delay in their offspring in the Australian Indigenous population. The findings also found living in remote areas has a protective effect against developmental delay in Indigenous children who born within the recommended range of birthweight adjusted for gestational age. These findings have implications for challenging and reframing the deficit discourse surrounding Indigenous Australian health research and policymaking. Further studies are needed to investigate the positive relationship between Indigenous Australians' health and social and emotional well-being (SEWB) and their connection to their country and culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06990-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Extensive literature has investigated the prenatal risk factors of developmental delay in children, with evidence highlighting the impact of prenatal health, mental health, and behavioural factors. While a deficit discourse has underscored Indigenous health research and policies, strengths-based approaches provide an opportunity to reframe this discourse, to illustrate and celebrate the strength and resilience of Australian Indigenous families. As such, this study aimed to identify the protective impact of healthy pregnancy and lifestyle in mothers on developmental delay in Indigenous Australian children; and whether it varies by child birthweight adjusted for gestational age. Further, we also tested whether child birthweight for adjusted gestational age mediates the association between a healthy pregnancy and lifestyle in mothers and developmental delay in their Indigenous offspring.

Methods: Strength-based analysis was conducted using data from 8 longitudinal waves of LSIC study in Australia. Random-effect models were used to longitudinally measure the impact of maternal healthy pregnancy and lifestyle on developmental delays in their children between 2008 and 2018. A composite score (ranging from 0 to 3, score = 3 refers to most healthy pregnancy) was created for a healthy pregnancy and lifestyle variable using three criteria - (1) a lack of medical conditions, (2) no substance use including smoking/alcohol/illicit drugs, and (3) intake of iron/folic acid during pregnancy. All models were adjusted for potential covariates.

Results: Of the 780 mother-child dyads analysed, 65.4% of mothers reported healthy pregnancy and lifestyle; while 73.5% of children born with a recommended appropriate birthweight adjusted for gestational age, and 91.4% reported no developmental delays. In children born in the recommended range of appropriate birthweight adjusted for gestational age, healthy pregnancy in mothers (most healthy, aOR: 4.76, 95% CI: 1.12-20.18; and 2nd most healthy, aOR: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.09-14.83) was protective against development delay compared to maternal unhealthy pregnancy. Living in remote areas (vs. major city, and regional) was also found to be protective against developmental delay in those who were born within the recommended range of birthweight adjusted for gestational age. Further, the current study found that child birthweight for adjusted gestational age does not have any mediating effect on the association between healthy pregnancy in mothers and developmental delay in their children.

Conclusion: This strengths-based study suggests healthy pregnancy in mothers should be advocated to prevent developmental delay in their offspring in the Australian Indigenous population. The findings also found living in remote areas has a protective effect against developmental delay in Indigenous children who born within the recommended range of birthweight adjusted for gestational age. These findings have implications for challenging and reframing the deficit discourse surrounding Indigenous Australian health research and policymaking. Further studies are needed to investigate the positive relationship between Indigenous Australians' health and social and emotional well-being (SEWB) and their connection to their country and culture.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母亲的健康妊娠和生活方式对后代发育迟缓的影响:对澳大利亚土著儿童纵向研究的强度分析。
导言:大量文献对导致儿童发育迟缓的产前风险因素进行了调查,有证据强调了产前健康、心理健康和行为因素的影响。虽然土著人健康研究和政策中存在着不足之处,但以优势为基础的方法提供了一个机会来重构这一论述,以说明和赞美澳大利亚土著家庭的力量和韧性。因此,本研究旨在确定母亲的健康妊娠和生活方式对澳大利亚土著儿童发育迟缓的保护性影响,以及这种影响是否会因胎龄调整后的婴儿出生体重而有所不同。此外,我们还测试了调整胎龄后的儿童出生体重是否会调节母亲健康的孕期和生活方式与土著后代发育迟缓之间的关系:方法:我们利用澳大利亚 LSIC 研究 8 个纵向波次的数据进行了基于强度的分析。随机效应模型用于纵向测量2008年至2018年间母亲健康妊娠和生活方式对其子女发育迟缓的影响。健康妊娠和生活方式变量有三个标准,即(1)无疾病;(2)不使用药物,包括吸烟/酗酒/非法药物;(3)妊娠期间摄入铁/叶酸。所有模型均根据潜在的协变量进行了调整:在分析的 780 个母子二人组中,65.4% 的母亲表示孕期和生活方式健康;73.5% 的新生儿出生时的出生体重根据胎龄调整后达到了建议的适当水平,91.4% 的新生儿表示没有发育迟缓。在根据胎龄调整后的建议适当出生体重范围内出生的儿童中,与母亲的不健康妊娠相比,母亲的健康妊娠(最健康,aOR:4.76,95% CI:1.12-20.18;第二健康,aOR:4.02,95% CI:1.09-14.83)对发育迟缓具有保护作用。研究还发现,生活在偏远地区(与大城市和地区相比)的婴儿,如果出生时的出生体重在根据胎龄调整后的建议范围内,则对发育迟缓具有保护作用。此外,本研究还发现,调整胎龄后的婴儿出生体重对母亲健康怀孕与子女发育迟缓之间的关系没有任何中介作用:这项基于优势的研究表明,应提倡母亲健康怀孕,以防止澳大利亚土著居民的后代发育迟缓。研究结果还发现,生活在偏远地区的土著儿童,如果出生时的体重在根据胎龄调整后的建议范围内,则对其发育迟缓具有保护作用。这些发现对挑战和重构围绕澳大利亚土著人健康研究和决策的赤字论述具有重要意义。还需要开展进一步的研究,调查澳大利亚土著居民的健康、社会和情感福祉(SEWB)与其国家和文化之间的积极关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Effect of day 3 embryo cell number on the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of day 4 single embryo transfer from fresh cycles. Glycated albumin levels in the third trimester of women with gestational diabetes mellitus are associated with adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Impact of healthy pregnancy and lifestyle in mothers on developmental delay in their offspring: a strength-based analysis of a longitudinal study among indigenous children in Australia. Complicated grief following the perinatal loss: a systematic review. Correction: What tools are available to assess climate and environmental health impacts on perinatal families with an equity lens? A rapid review of the Canadian context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1