Dmitrij Kravchenko , Milan Vecsey-Nagy , Akos Varga-Szemes , Muhammad Taha Hagar , U. Joseph Schoepf , Chiara Gnasso , Emese Zsarnóczay , Jim O'Doherty , Damiano Caruso , Andrea Laghi , Tilman Emrich , Giuseppe Tremamunno
{"title":"Intra-individual radiomic analysis of pericoronary adipose tissue: Photon-counting detector vs energy-integrating detector CT angiography","authors":"Dmitrij Kravchenko , Milan Vecsey-Nagy , Akos Varga-Szemes , Muhammad Taha Hagar , U. Joseph Schoepf , Chiara Gnasso , Emese Zsarnóczay , Jim O'Doherty , Damiano Caruso , Andrea Laghi , Tilman Emrich , Giuseppe Tremamunno","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The impact of novel photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT technology on in-vivo radiomics is not fully understood. This study aimed to compare the intra-individual stability and reproducibility of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomic features between PCD-CT and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on both systems.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA on an EID-CT were prospectively enrolled for research PCD-CCTA within 30 days. Image acquisition parameters were standardized; PCD-CT datasets were reconstructed both down-sampled to 0.6 mm to match the clinical scan (PCD-CT<sub>DS</sub>) and at 0.2 mm ultrahigh-resolution mode (PCD-CT<sub>UHR</sub>). Automatic PCAT segmentation was performed; a total of 110 radiomic feature classes were extracted and compared across the three datasets (EID-CT, PCD-CT<sub>DS</sub>, and PCD-CD<sub>UHR</sub>). Feature stability was assessed using paired <em>t</em>-test filtered for false discoveries using Benjamini–Hochberg method, and reproducibility using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 42 patients (34 male [81.0 %]; 67.9 ± 7.6 years) were included. Feature stability was 91 % for EID-CT vs. PCD-CT<sub>DS</sub>, but decreased for UHR datasets (EID-CT vs. PCD-CT<sub>UHR</sub>: 55 %; PCD-CT<sub>DS</sub> vs. PCD-CT<sub>UHR</sub>: 51 %). However, inter-scanner reproducibility was poor in both comparisons (EID-CT vs. PCD-CT<sub>DS</sub> median ICC: 0.43 [0.03–0.69]; EID-CT vs. PCD-CT<sub>UHR</sub>: 0.29 [0.01–0.51]). Nevertheless, reproducibility improved within PCD-CT datasets (PCD-CT<sub>DS</sub> vs. PCD-CT<sub>UHR</sub>: 0.72 [0.48–0.83]), regardless of the difference in slice thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most PCAT radiomic features remained stable between EID-CT and PCD-CT<sub>DS</sub>, although inter-scanner reproducibility was poor, emphasizing the significant impact of detector technology. Conversely, reproducibility of features within PCD-CT datasets showed more consistent results, even when comparing standard to UHR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"420 ","pages":"Article 132749"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324013718","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The impact of novel photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT technology on in-vivo radiomics is not fully understood. This study aimed to compare the intra-individual stability and reproducibility of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) radiomic features between PCD-CT and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography (CCTA) on both systems.
Methods
Patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA on an EID-CT were prospectively enrolled for research PCD-CCTA within 30 days. Image acquisition parameters were standardized; PCD-CT datasets were reconstructed both down-sampled to 0.6 mm to match the clinical scan (PCD-CTDS) and at 0.2 mm ultrahigh-resolution mode (PCD-CTUHR). Automatic PCAT segmentation was performed; a total of 110 radiomic feature classes were extracted and compared across the three datasets (EID-CT, PCD-CTDS, and PCD-CDUHR). Feature stability was assessed using paired t-test filtered for false discoveries using Benjamini–Hochberg method, and reproducibility using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results
A total of 42 patients (34 male [81.0 %]; 67.9 ± 7.6 years) were included. Feature stability was 91 % for EID-CT vs. PCD-CTDS, but decreased for UHR datasets (EID-CT vs. PCD-CTUHR: 55 %; PCD-CTDS vs. PCD-CTUHR: 51 %). However, inter-scanner reproducibility was poor in both comparisons (EID-CT vs. PCD-CTDS median ICC: 0.43 [0.03–0.69]; EID-CT vs. PCD-CTUHR: 0.29 [0.01–0.51]). Nevertheless, reproducibility improved within PCD-CT datasets (PCD-CTDS vs. PCD-CTUHR: 0.72 [0.48–0.83]), regardless of the difference in slice thickness.
Conclusions
Most PCAT radiomic features remained stable between EID-CT and PCD-CTDS, although inter-scanner reproducibility was poor, emphasizing the significant impact of detector technology. Conversely, reproducibility of features within PCD-CT datasets showed more consistent results, even when comparing standard to UHR.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers.
In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.