Spatial accessibility and equity of primary healthcare in Zhejiang, China.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2024-11-23 DOI:10.1186/s12939-024-02333-x
Rixiang Xu, Caiming Xu, Lang Wu, Xuefeng Xie, Tingyu Mu
{"title":"Spatial accessibility and equity of primary healthcare in Zhejiang, China.","authors":"Rixiang Xu, Caiming Xu, Lang Wu, Xuefeng Xie, Tingyu Mu","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02333-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhancing the accessibility and equity of primary healthcare (PHC) is a crucial objective of China's healthcare reform. However, spatial barriers remain a significant factor contributing to the inequitable access to PHC services among residents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to quantify the spatial accessibility (SA) and evaluate the equity of PHC resources in a pilot province for healthcare reform, and its municipalities, thereby providing insights that can be generalized to the broader context of China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used the navigation function provided by Gaode Map to estimate the time it takes for residents to visit PHC institutions. The two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method, weighted by a Gaussian function, was employed to measure the SA of PHC institutions, general practitioners (GPs), and beds across various residential areas. The Gini coefficient was utilized to assess disparities in SA among different regions. Additionally, Getis-Ord Gi* analysis was conducted to visualize these spatial disparities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 25,601 residential and 1,451 healthcare points in Zhejiang Province, revealing significant disparities in SA of PHC. Urban residents reached PHC institutions faster than rural ones (7.05 ± 4.7 min vs. 9.17 ± 7.78 min, P < 0.001). Within 30 min, 98.4% of residential points and 99.1% of the population accessed PHC institutions. Disparities in PHC resources were notable, with Lishui having the highest SA for institutions and GPs, and Shaoxing for beds. Equity assessment showed high inequity for institutions (Gini 0.553), moderate for beds (Gini 0.497), and reasonable for GPs (Gini 0.332)​. Getis-Ord Gi* analysis demonstrated that areas further from urban centers were more likely to exhibit clusters of hotspots or cold spots.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study highlights substantial disparities in SA of PHC and equity across Zhejiang, underscoring the need for strategic resource distribution. Future research should include diverse transportation modes and more precise demand point data to enhance understanding of accessibility dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"247"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11585951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02333-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Enhancing the accessibility and equity of primary healthcare (PHC) is a crucial objective of China's healthcare reform. However, spatial barriers remain a significant factor contributing to the inequitable access to PHC services among residents.

Objective: This study aims to quantify the spatial accessibility (SA) and evaluate the equity of PHC resources in a pilot province for healthcare reform, and its municipalities, thereby providing insights that can be generalized to the broader context of China.

Methods: The study used the navigation function provided by Gaode Map to estimate the time it takes for residents to visit PHC institutions. The two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method, weighted by a Gaussian function, was employed to measure the SA of PHC institutions, general practitioners (GPs), and beds across various residential areas. The Gini coefficient was utilized to assess disparities in SA among different regions. Additionally, Getis-Ord Gi* analysis was conducted to visualize these spatial disparities.

Results: The study analyzed 25,601 residential and 1,451 healthcare points in Zhejiang Province, revealing significant disparities in SA of PHC. Urban residents reached PHC institutions faster than rural ones (7.05 ± 4.7 min vs. 9.17 ± 7.78 min, P < 0.001). Within 30 min, 98.4% of residential points and 99.1% of the population accessed PHC institutions. Disparities in PHC resources were notable, with Lishui having the highest SA for institutions and GPs, and Shaoxing for beds. Equity assessment showed high inequity for institutions (Gini 0.553), moderate for beds (Gini 0.497), and reasonable for GPs (Gini 0.332)​. Getis-Ord Gi* analysis demonstrated that areas further from urban centers were more likely to exhibit clusters of hotspots or cold spots.

Conclusion: The study highlights substantial disparities in SA of PHC and equity across Zhejiang, underscoring the need for strategic resource distribution. Future research should include diverse transportation modes and more precise demand point data to enhance understanding of accessibility dynamics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国浙江初级医疗保健的空间可及性与公平性。
背景:提高初级卫生保健(PHC)的可及性和公平性是中国医疗改革的重要目标。然而,空间障碍仍然是导致居民无法公平获得初级卫生保健服务的一个重要因素:本研究旨在量化医疗改革试点省及其直辖市的空间可及性(SA),并评估初级卫生保健资源的公平性,从而提供可推广至中国更广阔范围的见解:研究利用高德地图提供的导航功能估算居民前往初级卫生保健机构所需的时间。采用高斯函数加权的两步浮动集水区(2SFCA)方法,测算了不同居民区的初级卫生保健机构、全科医生(GP)和床位的分布情况。基尼系数被用来评估不同地区之间的卫生服务水平差距。此外,还进行了 Getis-Ord Gi* 分析,以直观显示这些空间差异:研究分析了浙江省的 25,601 个居民点和 1,451 个医疗点,结果显示,初级保健服务的空间分布存在显著差异。城市居民到达初级卫生保健机构的时间快于农村居民(7.05±4.7 分钟 vs. 9.17±7.78 分钟,P 结论:该研究凸显了城市居民到达初级卫生保健机构的时间存在巨大差异:本研究强调了浙江各地在初级保健服务区和公平性方面的巨大差异,强调了战略性资源分配的必要性。未来的研究应包括多种交通方式和更精确的需求点数据,以加深对可达性动态的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Does an innovative case-based payment scheme promote the hierarchical medical system? A tripartite evolutionary game analysis. Is the diagnosis and treatment of depression gender-biased? Evidence from a population-based aging cohort in Sweden. Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review. Trends and inequalities in health system satisfaction: results from the latest nationally representative surveys in Qatar. Intersectional inequalities in mental health by education, income, gender, and age before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a longitudinal study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1