Development and Validation of Chinese Version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire.

IF 3.2 3区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International dental journal Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.003

Yao Feng, Ying-Hui Zhou, Qian Zhang, Wen-Bo Ma, Ze-Xiang Yu, Yi-Fan Yang, Bi-Fen Kuang, Yun-Zhi Feng, Yue Guo

{"title":"Development and Validation of Chinese Version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire.","authors":"Yao Feng, Ying-Hui Zhou, Qian Zhang, Wen-Bo Ma, Ze-Xiang Yu, Yi-Fan Yang, Bi-Fen Kuang, Yun-Zhi Feng, Yue Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Dental pain is one of the most prevalent oral complaints. This study aimed to establish a Chinese version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire (DePaQ) to help classify patients into three groups of dental pain diseases (group 1, reversible pulpitis and dentine hypersensitivity; group 2, acute periapical periodontitis and irreversible pulpitis; and group 3, pericoronitis).Methods: The DePaQ was translated from English to Chinese. The clinical subjects (CS, n = 290) and nonclinical subjects (NS, n = 100) with dental pain were collected. The CS were randomly divided into two subsamples: CS1 (n = 203) and CS2 (n = 87). The Fisher discriminant functions of the final 13-item Chinese version of the DePaQ were obtained from the CS1 group, and discriminant validity was further verified in the CS2 and NS groups.Results: The discriminant functions of the final 13-item DePaQ obtained from the CS1 group were capable of correctly distinguishing 93.1% and 89.0% cases of the CS2 and NS groups, respectively. In the CS2 group, the sensitivity for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 88.0%, 80.0%, and 83.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 95.0%, 95.0%, and 86.0%, respectively. In the NS group, the sensitivity for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 82.0%, 80.0%, and 86.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 91.0%, 97.0%, and 90.0%, respectively.Conclusions: The Chinese version of DePaQ could help classify the three groups of dental pain diseases and guide medical treatment.","PeriodicalId":13785,"journal":{"name":"International dental journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dental pain is one of the most prevalent oral complaints. This study aimed to establish a Chinese version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire (DePaQ) to help classify patients into three groups of dental pain diseases (group 1, reversible pulpitis and dentine hypersensitivity; group 2, acute periapical periodontitis and irreversible pulpitis; and group 3, pericoronitis).

Methods: The DePaQ was translated from English to Chinese. The clinical subjects (CS, n = 290) and nonclinical subjects (NS, n = 100) with dental pain were collected. The CS were randomly divided into two subsamples: CS1 (n = 203) and CS2 (n = 87). The Fisher discriminant functions of the final 13-item Chinese version of the DePaQ were obtained from the CS1 group, and discriminant validity was further verified in the CS2 and NS groups.

Results: The discriminant functions of the final 13-item DePaQ obtained from the CS1 group were capable of correctly distinguishing 93.1% and 89.0% cases of the CS2 and NS groups, respectively. In the CS2 group, the sensitivity for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 88.0%, 80.0%, and 83.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 95.0%, 95.0%, and 86.0%, respectively. In the NS group, the sensitivity for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 82.0%, 80.0%, and 86.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 91.0%, 97.0%, and 90.0%, respectively.

Conclusions: The Chinese version of DePaQ could help classify the three groups of dental pain diseases and guide medical treatment.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

牙痛筛查问卷中文版的开发与验证

简介牙痛是最常见的口腔疾病之一。本研究旨在建立中文版牙痛筛查问卷（DePaQ），以帮助将患者分为三类牙痛疾病（第1类，可逆性牙髓炎和牙本质过敏；第2类，急性根尖周炎和不可逆牙髓炎；第3类，冠周炎）：方法：将 DePaQ 从英文翻译成中文。方法：将 DePaQ 翻译成英文和中文，收集牙痛的临床受试者（CS，n = 290）和非临床受试者（NS，n = 100）。CS 被随机分为两个子样本：CS1 (n = 203) 和 CS2 (n = 87)。从 CS1 组获得了最终 13 个条目中文版 DePaQ 的 Fisher 判别功能，并在 CS2 组和 NS 组进一步验证了判别有效性：结果：从 CS1 组获得的 13 个条目 DePaQ 的最终判别函数能够分别正确区分 CS2 组和 NS 组 93.1% 和 89.0% 的病例。在 CS2 组中，第 1、2 和 3 组的灵敏度分别为 88.0%、80.0% 和 83.0%，特异性分别为 95.0%、95.0% 和 86.0%。在 NS 组中，第 1、2 和 3 组的敏感性分别为 82.0%、80.0% 和 86.0%，特异性分别为 91.0%、97.0% 和 90.0%：中文版DePaQ有助于对三类牙痛疾病进行分类并指导治疗。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

6.10%

发文量

159

审稿时长

63 days

期刊介绍： The International Dental Journal features peer-reviewed, scientific articles relevant to international oral health issues, as well as practical, informative articles aimed at clinicians.