Development and Validation of Chinese Version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International dental journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.003
Yao Feng , Ying-Hui Zhou , Qian Zhang , Wen-Bo Ma , Ze-Xiang Yu , Yi-Fan Yang , Bi-Fen Kuang , Yun-Zhi Feng , Yue Guo
{"title":"Development and Validation of Chinese Version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire","authors":"Yao Feng ,&nbsp;Ying-Hui Zhou ,&nbsp;Qian Zhang ,&nbsp;Wen-Bo Ma ,&nbsp;Ze-Xiang Yu ,&nbsp;Yi-Fan Yang ,&nbsp;Bi-Fen Kuang ,&nbsp;Yun-Zhi Feng ,&nbsp;Yue Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Dental pain is one of the most prevalent oral complaints. This study aimed to establish a Chinese version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire (DePaQ) to help classify patients into three groups of dental pain diseases (group 1, reversible pulpitis and dentine hypersensitivity; group 2, acute periapical periodontitis and irreversible pulpitis; and group 3, pericoronitis).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The DePaQ was translated from English to Chinese. The clinical subjects (CS, <em>n</em> = 290) and nonclinical subjects (NS, <em>n</em> = 100) with dental pain were collected. The CS were randomly divided into two subsamples: CS1 (<em>n</em> = 203) and CS2 (<em>n</em> = 87). The Fisher discriminant functions of the final 13-item Chinese version of the DePaQ were obtained from the CS1 group, and discriminant validity was further verified in the CS2 and NS groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The discriminant functions of the final 13-item DePaQ obtained from the CS1 group were capable of correctly distinguishing 93.1% and 89.0% cases of the CS2 and NS groups, respectively. In the CS2 group, the sensitivity for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 88.0%, 80.0%, and 83.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 95.0%, 95.0%, and 86.0%, respectively. In the NS group, the sensitivity for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 82.0%, 80.0%, and 86.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 91.0%, 97.0%, and 90.0%, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Chinese version of DePaQ could help classify the three groups of dental pain diseases and guide medical treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13785,"journal":{"name":"International dental journal","volume":"75 2","pages":"Pages 1036-1046"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020653924015880","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Dental pain is one of the most prevalent oral complaints. This study aimed to establish a Chinese version of Dental Pain Screening Questionnaire (DePaQ) to help classify patients into three groups of dental pain diseases (group 1, reversible pulpitis and dentine hypersensitivity; group 2, acute periapical periodontitis and irreversible pulpitis; and group 3, pericoronitis).

Methods

The DePaQ was translated from English to Chinese. The clinical subjects (CS, n = 290) and nonclinical subjects (NS, n = 100) with dental pain were collected. The CS were randomly divided into two subsamples: CS1 (n = 203) and CS2 (n = 87). The Fisher discriminant functions of the final 13-item Chinese version of the DePaQ were obtained from the CS1 group, and discriminant validity was further verified in the CS2 and NS groups.

Results

The discriminant functions of the final 13-item DePaQ obtained from the CS1 group were capable of correctly distinguishing 93.1% and 89.0% cases of the CS2 and NS groups, respectively. In the CS2 group, the sensitivity for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 88.0%, 80.0%, and 83.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 95.0%, 95.0%, and 86.0%, respectively. In the NS group, the sensitivity for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 82.0%, 80.0%, and 86.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 91.0%, 97.0%, and 90.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

The Chinese version of DePaQ could help classify the three groups of dental pain diseases and guide medical treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙痛筛查问卷中文版的开发与验证
简介牙痛是最常见的口腔疾病之一。本研究旨在建立中文版牙痛筛查问卷(DePaQ),以帮助将患者分为三类牙痛疾病(第1类,可逆性牙髓炎和牙本质过敏;第2类,急性根尖周炎和不可逆牙髓炎;第3类,冠周炎):方法:将 DePaQ 从英文翻译成中文。方法:将 DePaQ 翻译成英文和中文,收集牙痛的临床受试者(CS,n = 290)和非临床受试者(NS,n = 100)。CS 被随机分为两个子样本:CS1 (n = 203) 和 CS2 (n = 87)。从 CS1 组获得了最终 13 个条目中文版 DePaQ 的 Fisher 判别功能,并在 CS2 组和 NS 组进一步验证了判别有效性:结果:从 CS1 组获得的 13 个条目 DePaQ 的最终判别函数能够分别正确区分 CS2 组和 NS 组 93.1% 和 89.0% 的病例。在 CS2 组中,第 1、2 和 3 组的灵敏度分别为 88.0%、80.0% 和 83.0%,特异性分别为 95.0%、95.0% 和 86.0%。在 NS 组中,第 1、2 和 3 组的敏感性分别为 82.0%、80.0% 和 86.0%,特异性分别为 91.0%、97.0% 和 90.0%:中文版DePaQ有助于对三类牙痛疾病进行分类并指导治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International dental journal
International dental journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The International Dental Journal features peer-reviewed, scientific articles relevant to international oral health issues, as well as practical, informative articles aimed at clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Assessing links between dental fluorosis and oral/systemic health via salivary microbiome in Chinese young adults Letter to the Editor on AI-Based Segmentation of Cemento-Osseous Dysplasias Comparative Performance of State-of-the-Art LLMs on the KDLE: A 2025 Benchmark Study Caries in primary teeth and caries in permanent teeth: association and effect modifiers Japan’s Four-Decade Natural Experiment in Early Childhood Caries: A Perspective on Prevention Pathways Beyond Fluoride
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1