Natalia Pelet Del Toro, Andrew Strunk, Amit Garg, George Han
{"title":"Prevalence and Treatment Patterns of Lichen Planus.","authors":"Natalia Pelet Del Toro, Andrew Strunk, Amit Garg, George Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic mucocutaneous inflammatory disease with significant morbidity but data on epidemiology and therapeutics for LP is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Describe overall prevalence of LP and dermatologist-prescribed LP treatments in US adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Explorys database, we analyzed prevalence of overall LP and dermatologists' utilization of medications of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 566,851 eligible patients in the prevalence analysis, there were 1,098 LP cases with a median age of 66 years. Overall crude prevalence of LP was 0.19% (95% CI 0.18-0.21) with higher prevalence in females (prevalence ratio vs. males 1.77, 95% CI 1.53-2.05). Standardized overall prevalence was 0.15%. Most LP patients diagnosed by dermatologists remained untreated after one year (n=1,061, 53%); the most common initial treatment was topical corticosteroids (38%). Treatment continuation after 1 year and switching were most common after initial use of systemic immunosuppressants (28% and 46%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The lack of a precise diagnosis code for non-oral LP allows for the potential of misclassification; disease severity cannot be established.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Standardized prevalence of overall LP was 0.15%. For patients requiring systemic immunosuppressive medications, treatment continuation and switching were more common, suggesting that further research into medication selection for LP may be clinically beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic mucocutaneous inflammatory disease with significant morbidity but data on epidemiology and therapeutics for LP is limited.
Objective: Describe overall prevalence of LP and dermatologist-prescribed LP treatments in US adults.
Methods: Using the Explorys database, we analyzed prevalence of overall LP and dermatologists' utilization of medications of interest.
Results: Among 566,851 eligible patients in the prevalence analysis, there were 1,098 LP cases with a median age of 66 years. Overall crude prevalence of LP was 0.19% (95% CI 0.18-0.21) with higher prevalence in females (prevalence ratio vs. males 1.77, 95% CI 1.53-2.05). Standardized overall prevalence was 0.15%. Most LP patients diagnosed by dermatologists remained untreated after one year (n=1,061, 53%); the most common initial treatment was topical corticosteroids (38%). Treatment continuation after 1 year and switching were most common after initial use of systemic immunosuppressants (28% and 46%, respectively).
Limitations: The lack of a precise diagnosis code for non-oral LP allows for the potential of misclassification; disease severity cannot be established.
Conclusions and relevance: Standardized prevalence of overall LP was 0.15%. For patients requiring systemic immunosuppressive medications, treatment continuation and switching were more common, suggesting that further research into medication selection for LP may be clinically beneficial.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.