{"title":"The masking effect of green innovation: A study based on carbon market shocks","authors":"Xiaoping He , Wenbo Dai","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous empirical evidence indicates that the carbon market exerts a positive influence on the performance of corporate green innovation. In light of the proposition that there are differences in the green innovation capabilities of firms, we propose a masking effect hypothesis which suggests that the carbon market does, in fact, improve firms' green innovation performance at the overall level. However, separately, this improvement effect is only observed for high-capability firms, and not for ordinary firms. We test the hypothesis and explore the potential mechanism. The results show that, firstly, the outstanding green innovation performance of high-capability firms leads to a masking effect, which is robust to different estimation methods and variable settings. Secondly, the high innovation capability increases the positive effect of the carbon market on green innovation, irrespective of whether the capability is brown or green, which means a weak version of the masking effect. Finally, the different propensities towards co-innovation lead to the masking effect.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 108035"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324007448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous empirical evidence indicates that the carbon market exerts a positive influence on the performance of corporate green innovation. In light of the proposition that there are differences in the green innovation capabilities of firms, we propose a masking effect hypothesis which suggests that the carbon market does, in fact, improve firms' green innovation performance at the overall level. However, separately, this improvement effect is only observed for high-capability firms, and not for ordinary firms. We test the hypothesis and explore the potential mechanism. The results show that, firstly, the outstanding green innovation performance of high-capability firms leads to a masking effect, which is robust to different estimation methods and variable settings. Secondly, the high innovation capability increases the positive effect of the carbon market on green innovation, irrespective of whether the capability is brown or green, which means a weak version of the masking effect. Finally, the different propensities towards co-innovation lead to the masking effect.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.