Economical driving and taxation of road use

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108193
Geir H.M. Bjertnæs
{"title":"Economical driving and taxation of road use","authors":"Geir H.M. Bjertnæs","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A tax on fuel that promotes a more fuel-saving driving style leads to both fewer accidents and less noise pollution per mile driven, but also more driving due to a lower cost of driving. The present study contributes to the literature by calculating second-best optimal taxes on fuel and vehicle miles travelled within a model framework that incorporates such tax-induced impacts on externalities. The study shows that the current US tax wedge between gasoline and non-polluting goods, approximately USD 0.3 per gallon, is far below a conservative estimate of the second-best optimal tax wedge of approximately USD 2.2 per gallon, and even further below best-practice estimates of USD 3.5–4.38 per gallon. The current UK tax wedge is slightly below a conservative estimate of the optimal tax wedge of approximately USD 3 per gallon. The study also shows that the second-best optimal tax rate on fuel exceeds the marginal damage of fuel-related externalities when combined with a tax on vehicle miles travelled. The tax on vehicle miles travelled is reduced below the marginal damage of mileage-related externalities in this case to prevent excessive taxation of driving.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 108193"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325000167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A tax on fuel that promotes a more fuel-saving driving style leads to both fewer accidents and less noise pollution per mile driven, but also more driving due to a lower cost of driving. The present study contributes to the literature by calculating second-best optimal taxes on fuel and vehicle miles travelled within a model framework that incorporates such tax-induced impacts on externalities. The study shows that the current US tax wedge between gasoline and non-polluting goods, approximately USD 0.3 per gallon, is far below a conservative estimate of the second-best optimal tax wedge of approximately USD 2.2 per gallon, and even further below best-practice estimates of USD 3.5–4.38 per gallon. The current UK tax wedge is slightly below a conservative estimate of the optimal tax wedge of approximately USD 3 per gallon. The study also shows that the second-best optimal tax rate on fuel exceeds the marginal damage of fuel-related externalities when combined with a tax on vehicle miles travelled. The tax on vehicle miles travelled is reduced below the marginal damage of mileage-related externalities in this case to prevent excessive taxation of driving.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济驾驶和道路使用税
征收燃油税是为了提倡一种更省油的驾驶方式,这不仅会减少每英里的交通事故和噪音污染,而且由于驾驶成本降低,也会增加驾驶次数。本研究通过在一个模型框架内计算燃料税和车辆行驶里程的次优税来为文献做出贡献,该模型框架包含了这种税收引起的外部性影响。研究表明,目前美国汽油和无污染商品之间的税收楔子约为每加仑0.3美元,远低于保守估计的第二优税收楔子约为每加仑2.2美元,甚至进一步低于最佳实践估计的每加仑3.5-4.38美元。目前英国的税收楔子略低于保守估计的最佳税收楔子,约为每加仑3美元。该研究还表明,当与车辆行驶里程税相结合时,燃油税的次优税率超过了燃油相关外部性的边际损害。在这种情况下,对车辆行驶里程的征税减少到与里程相关的外部性的边际损害以下,以防止对驾驶征税过多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Power hungry: How AI will drive energy demand Gone with the wind: Renewable energy projects and population change Street green space and electricity demand: Evidence from metered consumption data Corrigendum to “Is flexible plug-in electric vehicle charging an attractive investment? Evidence from implicit discount rate estimation” [Energy Economics 154 (2026) 109134]. The price of going green: Multi-objective optimization in the energy equity space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1