Semantic Building Information Modeling: An empirical evaluation of existing tools

IF 10.4 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Industrial Information Integration Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jii.2024.100731
Ignacio Huitzil , Miguel Molina-Solana , Juan Gómez-Romero , Marco Schorlemmer , Pere Garcia-Calvés , Nardine Osman , Josep Coll , Fernando Bobillo
{"title":"Semantic Building Information Modeling: An empirical evaluation of existing tools","authors":"Ignacio Huitzil ,&nbsp;Miguel Molina-Solana ,&nbsp;Juan Gómez-Romero ,&nbsp;Marco Schorlemmer ,&nbsp;Pere Garcia-Calvés ,&nbsp;Nardine Osman ,&nbsp;Josep Coll ,&nbsp;Fernando Bobillo","doi":"10.1016/j.jii.2024.100731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Semantic Building Information Modeling (BIM) consists in translating data expressed using BIM formats (namely IFC) into Semantic Web files using RDF serializations (e.g., Turtle). This enables the inference of new knowledge and constraint checking, among other advantages. While several software tools for translating BIM models into Semantic Web languages have been proposed in the literature, they differ in the features exposed.</div><div>This paper analyzes and empirically compares some of these tools (namely, IFC converters translating an input IFC model into an RDF graph), identifying their strengths and main limitations. Our methodology includes measuring computation times of common tasks (file conversion, query and inference over output files), assessing the retention of knowledge (particularly, geometric information) and examining reasoning capabilities (complexity and completeness of the resulting models). Our results show that IFCtoLBD is the best option in many cases. IFCtoRDF and IFC2LD are slower but better preserve geometric information, while KGG is faster at the expense of losing information in the translation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100731"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Information Integration","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452414X24001742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Semantic Building Information Modeling (BIM) consists in translating data expressed using BIM formats (namely IFC) into Semantic Web files using RDF serializations (e.g., Turtle). This enables the inference of new knowledge and constraint checking, among other advantages. While several software tools for translating BIM models into Semantic Web languages have been proposed in the literature, they differ in the features exposed.
This paper analyzes and empirically compares some of these tools (namely, IFC converters translating an input IFC model into an RDF graph), identifying their strengths and main limitations. Our methodology includes measuring computation times of common tasks (file conversion, query and inference over output files), assessing the retention of knowledge (particularly, geometric information) and examining reasoning capabilities (complexity and completeness of the resulting models). Our results show that IFCtoLBD is the best option in many cases. IFCtoRDF and IFC2LD are slower but better preserve geometric information, while KGG is faster at the expense of losing information in the translation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语义建筑信息建模:对现有工具的实证评估
语义建筑信息模型(BIM)包括将使用 BIM 格式(即 IFC)表达的数据转换为使用 RDF 序列化(如 Turtle)的语义网文件。除其他优点外,这还能推断新知识和进行约束检查。虽然文献中已经提出了几种将 BIM 模型转化为语义网语言的软件工具,但它们所展示的功能各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Information Integration
Journal of Industrial Information Integration Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
13.40%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Information Integration focuses on the industry's transition towards industrial integration and informatization, covering not only hardware and software but also information integration. It serves as a platform for promoting advances in industrial information integration, addressing challenges, issues, and solutions in an interdisciplinary forum for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. The Journal of Industrial Information Integration welcomes papers on foundational, technical, and practical aspects of industrial information integration, emphasizing the complex and cross-disciplinary topics that arise in industrial integration. Techniques from mathematical science, computer science, computer engineering, electrical and electronic engineering, manufacturing engineering, and engineering management are crucial in this context.
期刊最新文献
The impact of generative AI on management innovation Digital twin-enabled multi-robot system for collaborative assembly of unorganized parts A comprehensive analysis of multi-strategic RIME algorithm for UAV path planning in varied terrains Towards cognitive intelligence-enabled product design: The evolution, state-of-the-art, and future of AI-enabled product design A blockchain-enabled horizontal federated learning system for fuzzy invasion detection in maintaining space security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1