Uncertainty analysis for design rainfall estimation using peaks-over-threshold model and specially formulated pivotal quantities

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132379
Weiqiang Zheng , Shuguang Liu , Zhengzheng Zhou , Yiping Guo
{"title":"Uncertainty analysis for design rainfall estimation using peaks-over-threshold model and specially formulated pivotal quantities","authors":"Weiqiang Zheng ,&nbsp;Shuguang Liu ,&nbsp;Zhengzheng Zhou ,&nbsp;Yiping Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uncertainties associated with the estimated design rainfall depths are difficult to quantify, especially if the uncertainties of the threshold used in the traditional peaks-over-threshold model need to be quantified and included. In this paper, we propose a data-based framework to quantify all the sources of uncertainties associated with the estimation of design rainfall. Three pivotal quantities are formulated to assess the uncertainties of parameters used in generalized Pareto distributions. The frequency distributions of thresholds are determined based on goodness-of-fit tests. The proposed framework is applied at 42 precipitation stations in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Interval estimates of distribution parameters and design rainfall depths are obtained at these stations. The results show that the spatial distributions of the parameter uncertainties are complex. At some areas, the design rainfall depths and their uncertainties are both high, leading to poor reliability of estimated design rainfall depths. Compared with the conventional bootstrap and Bayesian methods, the pivotal quantity method can provide more reliable results on the estimations of the joint distributions of parameters. The proposed framework is demonstrated to be useful and effective for all the 42 stations and is recommended for use in other areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"647 ","pages":"Article 132379"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216942401775X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainties associated with the estimated design rainfall depths are difficult to quantify, especially if the uncertainties of the threshold used in the traditional peaks-over-threshold model need to be quantified and included. In this paper, we propose a data-based framework to quantify all the sources of uncertainties associated with the estimation of design rainfall. Three pivotal quantities are formulated to assess the uncertainties of parameters used in generalized Pareto distributions. The frequency distributions of thresholds are determined based on goodness-of-fit tests. The proposed framework is applied at 42 precipitation stations in the Yangtze River Delta region of China. Interval estimates of distribution parameters and design rainfall depths are obtained at these stations. The results show that the spatial distributions of the parameter uncertainties are complex. At some areas, the design rainfall depths and their uncertainties are both high, leading to poor reliability of estimated design rainfall depths. Compared with the conventional bootstrap and Bayesian methods, the pivotal quantity method can provide more reliable results on the estimations of the joint distributions of parameters. The proposed framework is demonstrated to be useful and effective for all the 42 stations and is recommended for use in other areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用阈值峰值模型和特别制定的枢轴量估算设计降雨量的不确定性分析
与估算的设计降雨深度相关的不确定性很难量化,特别是如果需要量化和包含传统的峰值-阈值模型中使用的阈值的不确定性。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于数据的框架,用于量化与设计降雨量估算相关的所有不确定性来源。本文提出了三个关键量,用于评估广义帕累托分布中使用的参数的不确定性。阈值的频率分布是根据拟合优度测试确定的。在中国长江三角洲地区的 42 个降水站应用了所提出的框架。在这些站点获得了分布参数和设计降雨深度的区间估计值。结果表明,参数不确定性的空间分布是复杂的。在某些地区,设计雨量深度及其不确定性都很高,导致估计设计雨量深度的可靠性较差。与传统的引导法和贝叶斯法相比,枢轴量法可以提供更可靠的参数联合分布估计结果。事实证明,所提出的框架对所有 42 个站点都是有用和有效的,建议在其他地区使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
Soil effective clay content and sediment load reduce soil detachment rate by rill flow Interactions between antibiotic resistance and arsenic metabolizing genes in geogenic contaminated groundwater: Consequence for arsenic migration Spatial-temporal dynamics of meteorological and agricultural drought in Northwest China: Propagation, drivers and prediction Integration of SWAT-DPS and optimization algorithm for spatial design of ditch-pond systems in small agricultural catchments Terrestrial ecosystem resilience to drought stress and driving mechanisms thereof in the Yellow River Basin, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1